(#1)
|
|
Registered User
 Posts: 2
Join Date: Feb 2003
Reputation Power: 0
|
riaa another question -
February 16th, 2003, 08:21 AM
If it is illegal to copy music and the time line of copyright material has been expanded. Is it legal for a musician to make a cover of a a song if the musician is dead or has not given that band permision. If it is legal is it only illegal to change the music not taking into account that by a different person singing on the song that the music has already been changed. If it is legal to make a copy " cover " or a song why is it illegal for someone to copy a song onto a hard drive and share it amongst a peer group when the band playing the song "cover " is doing exactly the same thing ?
|
|
|
|
|
(#2)
|
|
What the Hell is a Rant?
Posts: 1,247
Join Date: Apr 2002
Age: 23
Reputation Power: 155
|
February 16th, 2003, 08:26 AM
im not followin ya here........
For shizzle my nizzle, its the TYBizzle hizzle. Chizzle's avizzzle is the shizzle!!!! Yo, TYBizzle didnt get no spizzle from cpugizzle. What the dizzle, homes? I have no idea what I just wrote. |
 |
|
|
(#3)
|
|
Registered User
Posts: 2
Join Date: Feb 2003
Reputation Power: 0
|
February 16th, 2003, 08:36 AM
I a band plays a cover of a song they are playing a copy of the original. If the charge a cover charge to hear this live they are selling a copy of the original
if they record a cover of a song on an album of an artist that is no longer here to ok that band to use the cover on there album then they are stealing a song for there own profit what i am getting at is most new bands play covers and record covers on there first albums are they not breaking the copyright law themselves |
|
|
|
|
(#4)
|
|
Mr Roboto
Posts: 293
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: irc.p2pchat.net
Reputation Power: 102
|
February 16th, 2003, 09:06 AM
their label usually holds the copyright to the song.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
