| View Poll Results: Which is your favorite OS? | |||
| Windows. |
|
11 | 50.00% |
| Linux. |
|
7 | 31.82% |
| Mac. |
|
1 | 4.55% |
| DOS/Terminal. |
|
2 | 9.09% |
| Other. |
|
1 | 4.55% |
| Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1)
|
(#2)
|
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
(#5)
|
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
(#8)
|
(#9)
|
(#10)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 303
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wollongong NSW AUSTRALIA
Age: 30
Reputation Power: 106
|
February 7th, 2003, 11:12 AM
Quote:
Goober!! |
|
|
|
|
(#11)
|
|
Zeropaid Forum Angel
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,008
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dearborn
Age: 25
Reputation Power: 527
|
February 7th, 2003, 12:17 PM
An easy but a tad risky way to install multiple OSes is to first install your Windows OS, then install Linux and use the Disk druid to resize the Windows partition to make room for your Linux OS. This is risky because it can make Windows unbootable but I have done it before.
I'm no expert on this and am only posting this for you to research a bit better. You should get more info and let someone who knows a bit more about what they are doing on this subject. Oh and don't forget to backup all of your data as a precautionary measure. |
|
|
|
(#12)
|
|
Registered User
![]() Posts: 1
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Purdue Univesity
Reputation Power: 0
|
I run Red Hat alongside WinXP. If you already have space set aside for linux, then the installation will be relatively simple. Red Hat, SuSE, and Mandrake all have great installers that make setting up a dual boot system a breeze. When you set up linux, you will need to set up 2 partitions: a boot partition (designated as /) and a swap partition. As a rule of thumb, your swap partition should be at least as big as the amount of RAM you have. Some people suggest 2 times the amount of RAM, but if you have 512 MB than I think this is overkill. When setting up your partitions, make sure to use a journaling filesystem (such as ext3 or reiserfs); they are more robust and protect against data loss if the system is ever shut down improperly or hangs. Your 16.1 Gigs is more than enough, the typical distro will take about 2 for a "desktop" install. Also, here are some notes on the distros:
SuSE - I used to use SuSE 8.0 before going to Red Hat. SuSE is good for beginners. It uses KDE as its default desktop, which I think is the best. System configuration is good, although it always had trouble with my USB mouse. Software is OK, but could be better. The downside is that you can't download SuSE ISO images; you have to do a network install. Mandrake - Mandrake 8.2 was my first distro. It was pretty good but I had problems with it. It is a good distro for new users, although some of its configuration tools (the Mandrake Menu!!) can be frustrating for "power users" because they make it harder to configure things by hand when you want to. Red Hat - I am happy with Red Hat. The default Bluecurve GNOME desktop is not that great, but it is easy to just make KDE the desktop and change the theme to your liking. The Red Hat update software is the best I have seen. Red Hat uses APT for package management so installing software is easy. Red Hat hardware configuration is also the best; it even autodetected my monitor model! Red Hat is very solid. Hope this helps. GO LINUX!! -Josh |
|
(#13)
|
|
Soulseeker? Seelenjäger!
![]() Posts: 630
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Above, AL
Age: 40
Reputation Power: 118
|
February 7th, 2003, 12:53 PM
I rank the four OSes I use as follows:
[list=1][*]Windows XP[*]Mac OS 9.1[*]Windows 2000[*]Windows ME[/list=1] I never tried Linux but can imagine that it would land somewhere in the first ranks (1 or 2). OS X is also appealing, and I could see myself "switch". |
|
(#14)
|
|
The Voice Of Reason
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,020
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ZP lounge
Reputation Power: 591
|
February 7th, 2003, 01:25 PM
Quote:
recently ive been multibooting with win98 for some old games, XP as my main OS, and playin around with first mandrake and now redhat on a third partition.I dont bother using a bootloader and just boot linux from a floppy, i suspect bootloaders might cause problems with your master boot record - maybe im wrong. Im certainly far from a linux guru, indeed i may be as raw a newbie as you will find, but i have a definate preference for rehat out of the two linux OSes i have tried. Redhat seems faster than mandrake, has a nice clean interface, seems to have better hardware support and doesnt install as default so much useless software (does anyone actually need 10 text editors) and seems to have more of a familiar "windows" feel - although this may just be my bad. Although ive been mightily impressed with the speed, dependability, and huge selection of free software available for linux i still think that windoze XP is still the natural choice for the vast majority of PC users. It has no hardware problems, masses of software, and for ease of use - despite what many in the linux community would have us believe, windows is still no1. "Talent borrows, genius steals" - Oscar Wilde |
|
|
(#15)
|














Linear Mode