| View Poll Results: Which, in your opinion, is the best gnutella client? | |||
| XoloX |
|
8 | 32.00% |
| Limewire (and variants) |
|
4 | 16.00% |
| BearShare |
|
3 | 12.00% |
| Gnucleus |
|
9 | 36.00% |
| Others |
|
1 | 4.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1)
|
(#2)
|
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
(#5)
|
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
(#8)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,941
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So Cal
Reputation Power: 205
|
same but not the same -
May 7th, 2002, 12:32 PM
Well I understand the idea of gnutella being one network that many different clients access.
But experience has shown me that connecting to say bearshare and doing a search, finding limited pickings and than doing same search on limewire. (both connected at same time) I get more hits/ Not that limewire is better. I do think most gnutella clients are ok. But it is almost like throwing the dice when you connect and do a search. I have had great success with xolox and then sometimes not! I think blubster is most consistant for speed, but it has some kind of memory hog spasms and when I am multi-tasking that is a bother. AudioGalaxy is way the best for finding hard to find music files. Kazaalite and Limewire seem to be the more consistent and better running file sharing clients for me at this time. |
|
(#9)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 65
Join Date: Apr 2002
Reputation Power: 96
|
May 9th, 2002, 08:47 PM
LimeWire gets my vote. In my testing, i get more results with it that with BearShare. It uses more RAM, but less CPU for me.
XOLOX was decent. a little simple. I do love partial downloads though. Gnucleus: free, open. I like that. I found it harder to connect with than LimeWire. hashes are cool Hashes and partial downloads are coming to LimeWire, so when they do, it will really get my vote. Of course, it also gets my vote for other reasons |
|












Linear Mode