(#1)
|
(#2)
|
|
SCHMOHAWK
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 15,178
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Forman's Basement
Age: 87
Reputation Power: 1538
|
April 25th, 2009, 03:11 PM
I take it all back! Here is a video of a fat guy in the car. I say he is fat because he gets out of breath climbing into the car. lol Anyways listen to this car! HERE This seems to be a prototype though because it has many things the car does not need like a clutch! He says this is one of the first 5 ever made so perhaps it has got some better but the video sounds loud!
|
|
|
|
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
(#5)
|
(#6)
|
|
SCHMOHAWK
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 15,178
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Forman's Basement
Age: 87
Reputation Power: 1538
|
April 25th, 2009, 03:34 PM
EDIT: Shit Kip, you messed up my roll! Some electric cars are bad ass! I don't know what you mean. This is just an attempt to bring out a very cheap one and thats not good right now. There are MANY electric cars rolling around here and people love them. Its the hot thing and probably the only cars selling. They are all over the place. All the coal required to keep these things pumping is concerning though. Its a good things we have a huge damn around here for most of our electricity! I am wondering if the electric grid can support all the electric cars if they become too popular. The grid is already unstable in many places. Electric cars could be the coffin nail. Im gonna stick to calling them caol cars from now on. Is coal cleaner than gasoline?
|
|
|
|
(#7)
|
|
gone into the sunset
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,697
Join Date: Oct 2007
Reputation Power: 329
|
April 25th, 2009, 03:44 PM
It's all a question of how much one is willing to pay for an electric car?
|
|
|
|
(#8)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 125
Join Date: Apr 2007
Reputation Power: 88
|
April 25th, 2009, 03:46 PM
coal is dirtier lol
Im with you on the principal its just the implementation- if you have to be in the top 10% of the population to get a decent electric its just not going to fly what we need is cheap electrics with a decent range for the masses I agree 100% its an excellent concept its just the implementation sucks |
|
|
|
(#9)
|
|
SCHMOHAWK
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 15,178
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Forman's Basement
Age: 87
Reputation Power: 1538
|
April 25th, 2009, 03:49 PM
Quote:
I got $5 on it! Obama will give you $4000 -$6000+ depending on what state you live in to buy one. That is a nice deal I think. There are some nice ones in the 15-16,000 range. |
|
|
|
|
(#10)
|
|
Eclectical genius
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 270
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: S. 37th street
Age: 36
Reputation Power: 110
|
April 26th, 2009, 12:46 AM
![]() WOODGAS POWERED VW'S AND OTHER VEHICLES Click HERE for an 86K JPG image of a wood gas generator equipped Kubelwagen and Type 60 Beetle. Fuel shortages during WWII prompted searches for alternative fuels in England, Germany, Scandinavia and many other countries. One of the most unusual solutions involved the modification of vehicles for use with wood, charcoal, or coal. Typical modifications included A) a gas generator; B) a gas reservoir; and C) carburetor modifications and additional plumbing to convey, filter, and meter the gas into the engine. The gas generator was an airtight vessel into which was introduced a charge of wood, charcoal, or anthracite coal. Heat was applied to the fuel either internally or externally to initiate a self-sustaining gassification of the fuel in an oxygen deprived environment. The resulting "woodgas" was piped to the reservoir, or in the case of small engines, directly to the engine carburetor. Wood-gas modified vehicles were therefore technically a "dual fuel" vehicle in that a self-sustaining gassification of the wood charcoal, or coal required another fuel to start the process. Gas reservoir sizes depended upon vehicle, engine, and gassifier size. Small vehicles and engines could be supplied directly from the gassifer, thus eliminating large reservoirs. Larger, more powerful vehicles required separate gas reservoirs to compensate for gassifer outputs which were less than the fuel consumption rate of the engine. These larger reservoirs usually took the form of gas bags that were attached to the roof or rear end of the vehicle. The largest mobile reservoirs were gas bags fitted to busses which were often several feet in diameter and as long as the vehicle. Although the designation T230 was used to indicate woodgas fuel systems fitted to both Kubelwagens and KdF Wagens (Type 60 wartime Beetles), surviving phototgraphs reveal that a variety of gas generator designs and hood sheet metal were employed. Vehicles so equipped are easily recognized by the vehicle's modified hood (28K JPG). Some photos show that the fuel loading hatch protruded from a port in the hood, while others illustrate an unbroken hoodline which completely enclosed the generator. Generally the woodgas fuel system comprised a gassifier container (20K JPG) approximately 18 to 24 inches in diameter and 30 to 36 inches in length (height) fitted into the nose of the vehicle. Both Kubelwagens and Beetles equipped with the T230 gas generator located the generator vessel ahead of the front axle beams where the spare tire was formerly located. Type 60's relocated the spare tire, along with extra bags of fuel, to a roof rack (28K JPG) on the roof of the vehicle. The bottom of the gas generator also extended below the original bodywork at the front of the vehicle, thus decreasing obstacle clearance. Other components of the VW T230 woodgas fuel system included: 1) a large (8" diameter by 30") gas filter cannister located just ahead of the windshield (and under the hood, in the case of the Type 60) 2) a secondary, rectangular gas filter (about 12" by 2" by 48") located crossways beneath the car behind the front wheels 3) a gas pump or fan located behind the rear torsion bar tube 4) a small final cannister filter in the engine bay 5) a fuel mixer at the engine intake manifold. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...a%3DN%26um%3D1 |
|
|
|
(#11)
|
|
Gemacht Sie schauen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,200
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: an island in the pacific
Reputation Power: 855
|
April 26th, 2009, 07:47 AM
I can't believe how many of those things are around here, where I live. It's like when PT Cruisers came out. At first you saw the odd one around and now every Tom, Dick and Harry has one.
They are extremely fuel efficient though. I will give you that. Just don't crash in one. We had one fatality here where one hit a dump truck. There wasn't much left of the poor little car. Today's subliminal thought is: |
|
|
|
(#12)
|
(#13)
|
(#14)
|
|
gone into the sunset
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,697
Join Date: Oct 2007
Reputation Power: 329
|
April 26th, 2009, 03:31 PM
I'm guessing they will stay with "extremely bright" colours to accentuate its shadow and its 10 sq. foot occupying quadrant.
![]() This is for m_r>> wonder if its aerodynamics will improve vs. its degraded functionality?
|
|
|
|
(#15)
|
|
Zeropaids nipple
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,692
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: purgatory
Age: 23
Reputation Power: 823
|
April 26th, 2009, 04:01 PM
Quote:
But again, as technology improves we will better be able to offer more versatile electric vehicles. This includes improvements in battery technology, materials with a higher strenght to weight ratio, as well as better aerodynamics. Still think for trucks and SUV's the best bet would be to invest in a plug in electric hybrid. If you have a truck because you occasionally haul heavy loads you could use battery power for commuting, and alternative fuel when hauling or when on long trips. The alternative fuel can be petrol, diesel or hydrogen. If I had to guess the future of transportation I would say its in giving consumers more fuel choices lowering dependence on fossil fuels, using it only as a secondary fuel source. Once technology improves far enough we will move to hydrogen, electric, or some other alternative fuel. Personally I've been keeping an eye on the Aptera. Its not restricting itself by trying to conform to conventional car design leading me to believe it will be better suited as a car replacement, rather than a complement to peoples daily vehicle. It is however a little pricey still, but I could see it becoming somewhat the norm in the future. http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=55492 |
|
|
|
|
















Linear Mode