the creed what the riaa has feared...an equal

[the creed]

we will open a new thread for elections but i am here to promothe the group for now and i will start an election in a week or so depends on how many people sigh up just place a post that says you want to join or you want to be a runner and i will start the elction from their after i have names of canidates then i will poll you for a week and the results will be published (a new thread will be started just for polling reasons still come here to talk) and plese petion for this bill to be vetod
http://www.petitiononline.com/riaawar/petition.html
:bk

[notbob]

if you could get a message across coherently i'd fear you more

online petitions are utterly meaningless-vote with your wallet. don't buy cd's

[Caitlyn Marble]

Uh, Creed, who are you "electing"? and who are "we"? Perhaps if you put your message and group creed into one post you might have more canidates.

EDIT: I've read around, and so If you want to be taken seriously and not as some sort of paranoid spammer, make a new thread and put all your info in to that.

[Jared592]

What's w/ all the grammatical errors in something that's supposed to represent the people in support of it?

"Maybe you’ll have a worst experience than this"

"If you read the article above, I want you to take notice of the section titled “Internet Warfare”. That paragraph shows us that we will not be given any rights to fight back against RIAA and the record companies. We need to resort to all we have, Internet Warfare. If the RIAA and record companies are allowed to hack our pc’s and the file sharing services, we should exhibit an eye for an eye attitude. From the moment that this bill is passed, I declare open hacking season on all RIAA websites, record company websites, and music artists’ websites. Deface them, crash there mail servers, shut them down!!! They will have to learn the hard way that they can’t bite the hand that feeds them."
- Threats such as this are unproductive and will have no effect. The writer should have gone easier on the threats...they lower us to the RIAA's level.

More grammar problems that suggest this was hastily written and the view of just one person: "And just a little question for our amusement, isn’t it funny that the same artists that say they are loosing money are the same artist that according to sound scan and the billboard charts continue to sell millions and millions of albums?!? Aren’t these the same artist that we continue to see on MTV cribs flaunting there numerous late model cars and thirteen room mansions?!?! Just to quote Sean Puff Daddy (P. Diddy) Combs, in a New York Times online article(http://nytimes.com/2002/09/26/business/26ADCO.html) “Put yourself in our shoes!” I have news for you Diddy; I would love to be in your shoes!"

"A message to Congress: Stop worrying about people sharing music and worry about the terrorism that killed three thousand people and now daily threatens innocent American lives!!"
-Come now, it shouldn't matter that there are more important issues. Don't trivialize our argument by intimating that because there was a terrorist attack that there should be attention shifted to that for now. We need to communicate confidence in our argument, not "terrorism's worse!".

I do think we need petitions, but I doubt online ones hold much weight. We need to get a human representative of p2p like I've been saying all along!!! Anyways, that's my opinion. :-)

[the creed]

this is exactly what i am talking about we need a place to where we can find out sites and e-mails to hack and we also need to find a person to talk to the riaa wich is what the election is for and we need places and people to organize us instead of blundering around a few people saying they wont buy cds for a week we need milions to say they wont buy for a month i think we should have a ban that lifts after the first of the year so that the riaa is boycotted when sales are highest this is probably how the riaa started a few people thought about it gathered up lawyers and toher helpful people they have a head start so the sooner groups fight them the sooner our opion is heard and the riaa has to compete with someone

[notbob]

Originally posted by the creed
this is exactly what i am talking about we need a place to where we can find out sites and e-mails to hack and we also need to find a person to talk to the riaa

hacking emails and talking to the riaa?

you can either do it one way or the other--legal or illegal

if you are having a dialog with the riaa (which wouldn't happen, because they have made it abundantly clear they don't care what we think) and you are caught doing illegal stuff (hacking emails) you would lose all credibility in the negotiations, and lose, plus go to jail

just share your files and shut up--that is the best way to send the riaa a message

http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/images/icons/icon5.gif

[Jared592]

Originally posted by the creed
this is exactly what i am talking about we need a place to where we can find out sites and e-mails to hack and we also need to find a person to talk to the riaa wich is what the election is for and we need places and people to organize us instead of blundering around a few people saying they wont buy cds for a week we need milions to say they wont buy for a month i think we should have a ban that lifts after the first of the year so that the riaa is boycotted when sales are highest this is probably how the riaa started a few people thought about it gathered up lawyers and toher helpful people they have a head start so the sooner groups fight them the sooner our opion is heard and the riaa has to compete with someone

Hey, no offense, but if you want to get a message across that people are going to understand, you might want to consider using punctuation. No one is gonna waste time tryin' to decipher some crazy 10 line blob of unorganized ideas.

EDIT: Haha notbob, you stole the words right out of my mouth...You can't go both ways (legal and illegal) and expect to be successful. Forget about trashing websites and servers. That only reinforces their view of us as childish looters.