ZeroPaid.com

eXTREME2002 · **Spybot or SpywareBlaster -** August 4th, 2004, 05:09 AM

Hi
Regarding the "Lock" feature which prevents spyware from invading into yr PC, these 2 programs, Spybot or & SpywareBlaster contain this feature but which one of them is better than the other regarding this

PS i am always against installing 2 software who have similar features and since Spybot contains an additional scanning feature which do not exist in the other, i preferred Spybot to use on my PC but i am not sure if it's "Lock" feature is better or worse the Lock feature of Spyware Blaster

Suggestions/recommendations would be highly appreciated

THX

mxpwx · August 4th, 2004, 05:17 AM

i personally like the one in ad aware pro version. but spybots is decent but teatimer tends to take up resources. im not sure on this

Smurf_Pimp · 10:03 AM

Use both. Spybot actually tells you to install SpywareBlaster along with it because it does a better job
mxpwx, he is talking about the Immunize function of Spybot vs Spyware blaster, not TeaTimer vs Ad-Watch

.:sp00ky:. · August 10th, 2004, 10:43 AM

you could always install firefox then you wouldnt need spywareblaster at all
(such a firefox fanboy!) :gj

Smurf_Pimp · August 10th, 2004, 10:49 AM

actually yes you would, the newest version of spyware blaster allows you to enable protection for firefox. as good as firefox is, you still need some added proection to protect against tracking cookies.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
spybot and adaware	flantanella	Spyware & Adware	2	June 16th, 2004 12:42 PM
Is SpyBot Search and Destroy not working?	TheChief	Spyware & Adware	19	May 30th, 2004 07:23 PM
Spybot Search and Destroy 1.3 RC3	The Hunter	Spyware & Adware	29	May 5th, 2004 09:24 PM
Spybot Search and Destroy 1.3 Beta 6	The Hunter	News	12	March 4th, 2004 11:50 AM
Spybot	ROMANTICGUY50	The Lounge	21	December 18th, 2003 08:10 PM

mxpwx Offline Zeropaid Regular Posts: 248 Join Date: Apr 2004 Reputation Power: 81	August 4th, 2004, 05:17 AM i personally like the one in ad aware pro version. but spybots is decent but teatimer tends to take up resources. im not sure on this

Smurf_Pimp Offline Pimping the Asexual Posts: 17 Join Date: Aug 2004 Reputation Power: 0	August 10th, 2004, 10:01 AM Use both. Spybot actually tells you to install SpywareBlaster along with it because it does a better job mxpwx, he is talking about the Immunize function of Spybot vs Spyware blaster, not TeaTimer vs Ad-Watch Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. Last edited by Smurf_Pimp; August 10th, 2004 at 10:03 AM. Reason: Forgot to add something

.:sp00ky:. Offline Poptart Tramp Posts: 2,394 Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In your pants. Age: 4 Reputation Power: 196	August 10th, 2004, 10:43 AM you could always install firefox then you wouldnt need spywareblaster at all (such a firefox fanboy!) :gj Rest in peace mother 16.1.2006 You will always be with me.

Smurf_Pimp Offline Pimping the Asexual Posts: 17 Join Date: Aug 2004 Reputation Power: 0	August 10th, 2004, 10:49 AM actually yes you would, the newest version of spyware blaster allows you to enable protection for firefox. as good as firefox is, you still need some added proection to protect against tracking cookies. Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.