(#1)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 304
Join Date: Jun 2003
Reputation Power: 94
|
Switch to Linux now or Die. -
February 13th, 2004, 02:43 AM
Microsofts source code has been leaked http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158...?tag=nefd_lede
Currently I'm betting thousands of hackers if not millions are reading it, and writing hundreds of trojans, viruses, expoits, works. I've been running Windows on a partition alongside Linux, but now that the whole world knows every single bug and flaw in Windows, any hacker can log into your machine just as if its their own. I suggest everyone here to switch to Linux now, and do not wait until your machine is hacked. If this news story is true, well everyones machine will be hacked pretty soon. http://www.deanforamerica.com/dtvbc |
|
|
|
(#2)
|
(#3)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 304
Join Date: Jun 2003
Reputation Power: 94
|
February 13th, 2004, 02:54 AM
because our friends and family members are, and by the way windows XP is based on 2000.
http://www.deanforamerica.com/dtvbc |
|
|
|
(#4)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 638
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland
Reputation Power: 114
|
February 13th, 2004, 03:11 AM
If you worry about the whole world knowing the source code of your OS, then isn't switching to Linux the last thing you should do? ;)
Avoiding viruses is easy, worms are a bit more difficult because you need to be a little active yourself to secure your computer from them. I'm not worried though. |
|
|
|
(#5)
|
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
|
w00t!
![]() Posts: 1,016
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Over by those boxes
Age: 24
Reputation Power: 125
|
February 13th, 2004, 04:13 AM
So, let's see - Linux's source is opening available, and that means more security. Microsoft's source is now available, and that means more security holes. Hmmm... which is the stronger OS?
|
|
|
(#8)
|
|
You! Ares! Now!
![]() Posts: 163
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent, UK
Age: 23
Reputation Power: 90
|
The entire windows source code would have to be around 40 gigs in size. All that's leaked is around 700mb (i certainly haven't seen anything bigger), just a fraction of the total source. It's still not good news, but its not as big a deal as everyone's making it out to be.
It'll probably just mean a couple of hundred patches :;) |
|
|
|
(#9)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,573
Join Date: May 2002
Reputation Power: 321
|
February 13th, 2004, 04:39 AM
Quote:
1: millions of hackers? i doubt it. 2: how is this different from any other day when a new flaw is found? 3: everyone's machine will be hacked? hmm, no. 4: stfu with the "switch to linux or your computer will be haxored" |
|
|
|
|
(#10)
|
|
Hurt no more my son.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,056
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: An angel in Heaven and on Earth
Age: 34
Reputation Power: 583
|
February 13th, 2004, 05:11 AM
arent the hackers mostly LINUX users.. ?
|
|
|
(#11)
|
|
Registered Moonatic
![]() Posts: 746
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Moon
Reputation Power: 117
|
February 13th, 2004, 05:24 AM
:fire
I use Windows 98 so I just get the normal older Windows garbage. Windows 2000, I never was into the NT line including XP. Linux is to hard to use or to hard to install and I have install many OS. :hole |
|
|
|
(#12)
|
(#13)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 304
Join Date: Jun 2003
Reputation Power: 94
|
February 13th, 2004, 06:12 AM
Well you all were warned.
Oh and yes Linux is open source, but theres a difference. Because I only can get part of the Windows sourcecode and not 100% of it, its not enough to actually write a patch but its just enough to spot bugs. Linux because we have all the source code and by design allows anyone to write a patch for it. Not to mention by design Linux cant get viruses, worms, or easily be hacked even if there is a bug. I'd say Linux even being open source is safer than Windows, and if you people think I'm lying when I say people will write a worm which hacks every single one of you, just wait a few months. I know if theres even one buffer overflow in certain parts of the code, a worm can basically infect miillions of computers in a matter of seconds via Kazaa which I'm sure most of you people use, and all that would be needed is your IP address meaning you cant do a damn thing abouit it unless you buy a hardware firewall. I know what I'm talking about, I was once one of these millions of people who run scripts, search for buffer overflows, etc. I know what comes next, I remember how winnuke made it so anyone could crash a Windows computer, I remember a time where I could hack any computer I wanted and no one knew anything about how to stop it. I don;t do that stuff anymore, I grew up but there are a lot of teenagers who hate their lives or who get bullied in school just waiting to fuck up your machines. Enjoy your next set of hundreds of super viruses/worms, believe me they ARE coming. I'll be using Linux. Oh and if you don't like Linux, go back to 98 like the other dude. Key is do not use Windows 2000/XP/NT http://www.deanforamerica.com/dtvbc |
|
|
|
(#14)
|
|
Gemacht Sie schauen
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,248
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: an island in the pacific
Reputation Power: 860
|
February 13th, 2004, 06:20 AM
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
(#15)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 304
Join Date: Jun 2003
Reputation Power: 94
|
February 13th, 2004, 06:32 AM
Quote:
Linux is secure for the exact opposite reason. All the hackers find the bugs immediately and a patch is usually released within a few hours, not 6 months later like on Windows. Also the type of bugs which plague linux are different and less dangerous than the bugs which plague Windows. In Windows a hacker is capable of hiijacking your entire machine, via a trojan or buffer overflow exploit. In Linux by design this is impossibel Linux is designed for hackers by hackers. Linux cannot be infected by a virus because Linux works in layers. Root is the most important layer. Then theres the user accounts. When you log into Linux you log in under your user account, your user account cannot control programs owned by other accounts on the same computer or the root programs without a password. This password protection prevents a virus from ever taking over an entire computer. The best a virus or worm can do is take over one user account on a computer. So Linux is pretty damn secure out of the box if you actually USE THE SECURITY. Mandrake has a lot of bugs but these bugs mostly bother people who use Mandrake as a server. These bugs almost always only work on a user account. So heres a tip, store all your important files under your root account. Store all your trivial files under your user account. When and if you ever do get hacked in Linux, the hacker will only be able to cause you to log out of that account, create a new account, and access your files on the root account from the newly created account. This could be done from the commandline in a matter of seconds, so unlike Windows where a hacker can do real damage and delete all your important work, in Linux its something to joke about or laugh at. Same goes with OSX which being unix as well has the same type of security. I laugh at hack attempts in Linux, in Windows I cry. "I have found absolutely nothing easy about linux, nothing! The big switch-over as suggested in this thread is simply not feasible for the average windows user." If you want the easy to use Linux, pay for Lindows. Linux Mandrake is hard to use because you didn't pay anything for it. Thats the Linux business model. The Linux companies make money by providing easy to use versions of Linux for people who want to switch. Linux Mandrake is not as easy as Lindows, but hey its free so you get what you pay for. http://www.deanforamerica.com/dtvbc |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Battle of the sexes (and toy penguins) In linux move | shawners | Linux | 2 | February 11th, 2004 04:50 PM |
| Another New Linux User | g-smooth2k | Linux | 41 | January 21st, 2004 05:42 PM |
| Linux, MacIntosh and the Global Futue | DudeAsInCool | Mac | 3 | January 3rd, 2004 02:56 AM |
| Red Hat Will Stop Releasing its Free Version... Sort Of | baghdad_steve15 | Linux | 0 | November 3rd, 2003 07:17 PM |











Linear Mode
