(#1)
|
(#2)
|
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
(#5)
|
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
(#8)
|
(#9)
|
|
lowly peasant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,103
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: just outside my head
Age: 30
Reputation Power: 193
|
now... -
August 12th, 2002, 02:37 PM
Im more paranoid than the average bear but this just seems like an overactive imagination or a case of seeing ninjas in the bushes. (that happened to me once, but it wasnt my fault) And besides, shareaza is the coming thing in gnutella, if all the designers ever agree on implementing standard protocols then it would be much ezasier to judge one client against another. or am I just talking out my butt?
And if I ever thought zeropaid was aligned with any creative team I would have to say it was xolox back when... but they were just working together during the new (disappointing unfortunately) release. -Oscar Wilde ZeroPaid UD homepage |
|
(#10)
|
(#11)
|
|
lowly peasant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,103
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: just outside my head
Age: 30
Reputation Power: 193
|
and didnt mean to suggest otherwise. I just meant to point out that it seemed more likely than some alignment with shareaza. Im more inclined to believethat shareaza is number one right now because it came out of relative nowhere and its many options. And when I said disappointing I was referring to xolox itself, not your announcement. It was hyped no doubt, but so what? that happens. and we were ALL expecting a better client out of xolox, that is what is disappointing.
So. I apologize for the confusion. :fire -Oscar Wilde ZeroPaid UD homepage |
|
(#12)
|
(#13)
|
(#14)
|
(#15)
|














Linear Mode