(#1)
|
|
BBS Klingon
![]() Posts: 298
Join Date: Jan 2003
Reputation Power: 98
|
Redhat phasing out desktop support -
November 6th, 2003, 03:58 PM
Now that Redhat is phasing out desktop support and concentrates on the server market and SuSE is being acquired by Novell, which distribution will become the next one to dominate the Linux desktop market?
It does seem as if Novell/SuSE will be geared to the server market as well. To me it looks like a heavy blow for the desktop use of Linux. I don't feel that Redhat's Fedora will be a viable replacement either. What do you think? You will find similar posts about the these issues over at slashdot http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=0...id=163&tid=187 |
|
|
|
(#2)
|
|
<insert humor here>
![]() Posts: 500
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whitness Protection Program
Age: 25
Reputation Power: 118
|
November 6th, 2003, 04:11 PM
I think possibly Mandrake, they have added more products for home users. Suse will hopefully continue desktop products.
-Rush "Spirit of Radio" My profile in Cnet's "Three I can't live without" |
|
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() Posts: 187
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: south BX
Age: 30
Reputation Power: 90
|
November 6th, 2003, 04:41 PM
yea red hat was mostly made to be a part of a network, it was essentially a true workstation distro.
mandrake has always been a home/small office distro and has good multimedia support right from the install making it a good begginers distro. although most people have praised the efforts of knoppix, i have tried it and its a very good distro and has plenty of apps right from the start, its also good to see it based on debian, ive always liked debian. theres more than 2 or 3 versions of linux for the desktop though. http://linuxiso.org http://distrowatch.com |
|
(#5)
|
(#6)
|
|
<insert humor here>
![]() Posts: 500
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whitness Protection Program
Age: 25
Reputation Power: 118
|
November 6th, 2003, 05:17 PM
Why wouldn't these companies continue to support desktop linux in one form or another (like Fedora)? I would think they they would want a desktop version to run on the cleints for the companies that have thier servers. There seems that would be worthwhile money wise, becuase it would be cheaper for companies to do that rather than winblows.
-Rush "Spirit of Radio" My profile in Cnet's "Three I can't live without" |
|
(#7)
|
(#8)
|
|
Jay Leno Geek
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,236
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lacrosse, Wi.
Age: 23
Reputation Power: 306
|
November 6th, 2003, 09:13 PM
Knoppix was pretty nice when I tried it last. I don't have time to play with a full blown linux distro, but I didn't see anything wrong with knoppix.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ClearSpeed to bring supercomputer speed to desktop PCs? | riderx | The Lounge | 25 | December 29th, 2004 07:21 PM |














Linear Mode
