| View Poll Results: What one was better | |||
| Napster |
   
|
24 | 55.81% |
| Audiogalaxy |
  
|
18 | 41.86% |
| Never tried either of them |
  
|
1 | 2.33% |
| Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1)
|
|
....
 
Posts: 1,057
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Unknown
Age: 21
Reputation Power: 143
|
What Was better Audiogalaxy/Napster -
July 26th, 2002, 06:04 AM
What was better Napster or Audiogalaxy everybody always compare the 2 so what one is better
|
    |
|
|
(#2)
|
|
....
Posts: 1,057
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Unknown
Age: 21
Reputation Power: 143
|
wow -
July 26th, 2002, 10:01 AM
wow
|
|
|
|
|
(#3)
|
|
Just Pirating Music
Posts: 99
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kentucky
Age: 30
Reputation Power: 94
|
July 26th, 2002, 11:50 AM
The only thing that Audiogalaxy had over Napster was you never had to worry about being disconnected, it just kept looking for new sources. With Audiogalaxy you could download all your music, go to bed and wake up with new music. But Audiogalaxy you could get the old plus the new music.
|
|
|
|
|
(#4)
|
|
only in it for the music
Posts: 768
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: nj
Age: 22
Reputation Power: 131
|
July 26th, 2002, 01:40 PM
Audiogalaxy was great for its sheer number of files available. The thing is, the blocking system took out a lot of potential downloads and kept it from being the best music file-sharing program ever. Until AG finally blocked those songs from being shared in groups, you COULD get any song you ever wanted to. No program ever matched the number of rare mp3s and remixes that AG had. Also, I gained so much music knowledge from AG. The ability to click a few times and have a 100 songs queued up was unbelievable.
|
|
|
|
|
(#5)
|
|
G33k
Posts: 313
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Somewhere
Age: 22
Reputation Power: 106
|
August 12th, 2002, 12:23 PM
napster was the best, hands down. I never liked ag due to its web interface.
|
|
|
|
|
(#6)
|
|
simulated cock fun
 
Posts: 3,641
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: idaho/california
Age: 19
Reputation Power: 535
|
August 12th, 2002, 02:53 PM
Napster was way better! AG was slow and stupid!:mellow
<note>evilmegaman=Robert</note> Me:people like your grouchy side.sometimes I think there's a group of guys on the forum in the same room jerking eachother off to your mean posts Potato:EW and btw, lol Me:xD |
|
|
|
|
(#7)
|
|
Kneel Before Zod......ZOD
Posts: 1,277
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Age: 42
Reputation Power: 159
|
September 4th, 2002, 01:20 AM
:devil I liked the speed and simplicity of napster but AG was great for the songs I could find
--Victor Hugo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cool site of the moment:http://www.zod2008.com/ |
|
|
|
|
(#8)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
Posts: 90
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On Campus
Age: 25
Reputation Power: 93
|
September 4th, 2002, 11:32 AM
I myself liked Napster, I could find everything that I wanted and it was easy, however I never tried AG because of the web interface and why should I have when I had Napster? Why am I even replying to this post if I didn't use AG? Sorry for the lack of intelligent input!:upside
|
|
|
|
|
(#9)
|
|
Jersey Wonderer
Posts: 60
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jersey
Age: 22
Reputation Power: 92
|
September 4th, 2002, 11:38 AM
i prefered napsters interface as it was not web based however i believe ag was better due to the amount of files and the rare music you were able to find
|
|
|
|
|
(#10)
|
|
Registered User
Posts: 2
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: canton,ohio
Age: 52
Reputation Power: 0
|
September 4th, 2002, 01:40 PM
I never had a chance to use Napster, but I was impressed with the fact that I found every song I couldn't find elsewhere on AG.:fire :fire :fire
|
|
|
|
|
(#11)
|
|
^________^
Posts: 472
Join Date: Aug 2002
Age: 22
Reputation Power: 113
|
September 4th, 2002, 02:19 PM
i liked both, but i liked AG better! it had everything that i wanted.
|
|
|
|
|
(#12)
|
|
Registered User
Posts: 3
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MD
Age: 22
Reputation Power: 0
|
September 21st, 2002, 02:41 PM
I really liked AG. Though I never had a chance to try Napster myself, I've heard great things about it, so to me, both will be missed. :(
[space cowgirl] |
|
|
|
|
(#13)
|
|
Registered User
Posts: 3
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: St.Louis
Age: 33
Reputation Power: 0
|
I Think -
September 21st, 2002, 03:57 PM
Napster was much better
AG was like Aol lol |
|
|
|
|
(#14)
|
|
Proud Girl Lover
Posts: 3,924
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tomoyos Little Black Box
Reputation Power: 353
|
You missed the dawn of the RIAA's downfall LOL -
September 22nd, 2002, 07:13 AM
Napster was the best I found ANYTHING an EVERYTHING I ever wanted on Napster, only downside was if you got a transfer error you had to start over. But the interface kicked ass - simple yet functional. I would have liked KL or morphues to have the same look with the added features - resume DL's all types of files. But oddly enough I wouldn't want to change anything on the old napster even if it meant mp3's were the only thing to DL since there was a shit load of rare file's that I haven't found on any other P2P network since then. Damn metalica that prick dug himself a deep hole when he pulled that shit, anyone get the scoop on that hacks CD sales? I bet there down to shit
Peace all, Later www.dakota-fanning.org www.elle-fanning.net |
|
|
|
|
(#15)
|
|
Rofl, you own a pentium?
Posts: 466
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Jomamma
Age: 90
Reputation Power: 111
|
October 15th, 2002, 02:37 PM
is there even a vote napster kicked..................and if it wasnt for that who knows we might be with the gnutella crap:hole
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
