| View Poll Results: you already know the question... | |||
| keep winxp home |
|
22 | 53.66% |
| find win2000 |
|
9 | 21.95% |
| find ms server 2003 |
|
2 | 4.88% |
| find a leak of longhorn |
|
0 | 0% |
| some version of linux |
|
8 | 19.51% |
| Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1)
|
(#2)
|
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
|
User is currently offline
![]() Posts: 216
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ...around
Age: 28
Reputation Power: 88
|
July 25th, 2003, 05:18 PM
If you like windowz, then I would highly recommend Windows XP Professional. If you hardly ever play games, then Windows 2000 Professional.
The difference between Windows 2003 Server & Windows XP, is obvious. Windows2k3 Server = Server, and WindowsXP is targeted for corporations & end users. (mostly the same difference between Windows 2000 Advanced Server & Windows 2000 Professional) The Server has advanced & more user-adjustable server options/features. hehe the only 2 reasons why I use Window$ instead of linux are 1) too lazy to switch the o/s on my computers 2) more compatibility with software.. ...that's just my 2¢ worth lateeeeeeee! [http://romp.com/] |
|
|
|
(#5)
|
|
Harbinger of mass Exodus
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,839
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Taking them with me
Reputation Power: 283
|
BUZZZzzzzzzzzzz Try again -
July 25th, 2003, 06:21 PM
Quote:
And a lot of the older games such as command and conquer red alert have patches you can download to run them on Windows 2000 professional. So, Windows 2000 Professional is a very viable gaming platform. ____________________________ Successfully Traded With: Tom, Dick, Harry, Jane, John, Bob, Billy, Bubba, Fileztradingzf0rl1fe, s00perdoopershareman, seeder55,000,000: and everyone else you have never heard of, trust, or give a shit about. |
|
|
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
|
Harbinger of mass Exodus
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,839
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Taking them with me
Reputation Power: 283
|
July 25th, 2003, 06:49 PM
Those games will run just fine isus, in fact i fired up sim city just to make sure and it runs fine :) (yes, i am talking the original version 1.1 from 1989 - 1992.
____________________________ Successfully Traded With: Tom, Dick, Harry, Jane, John, Bob, Billy, Bubba, Fileztradingzf0rl1fe, s00perdoopershareman, seeder55,000,000: and everyone else you have never heard of, trust, or give a shit about. |
|
(#8)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,573
Join Date: May 2002
Reputation Power: 320
|
July 25th, 2003, 07:05 PM
Quote:
thanks :) |
|
|
|
|
(#9)
|
|
Harbinger of mass Exodus
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,839
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Taking them with me
Reputation Power: 283
|
July 25th, 2003, 07:22 PM
Quote:
I used to have Simcity 3000 great game. Ever play Sim City 4?? Great game, just fantastic in its detail, but absolute murder on your computer. though they have released some patches that fix some those problems. Like a typical Sim City game, it takes a computer that is 6 months to a year newer then the game(yes i said newer as in, specs that aren't out yet) ____________________________ Successfully Traded With: Tom, Dick, Harry, Jane, John, Bob, Billy, Bubba, Fileztradingzf0rl1fe, s00perdoopershareman, seeder55,000,000: and everyone else you have never heard of, trust, or give a shit about. |
|
|
(#10)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,573
Join Date: May 2002
Reputation Power: 320
|
July 25th, 2003, 08:28 PM
lol, no, but i wanna try it.,, eventually. lol.
at the moment, i don't think a lot of games would be happy with my computer. i was glad enough to be able to play nfs2 at decent framerates. i have an nvidia gf2mx on a pci bus. lol. |
|
|
|
(#11)
|
|
Zeropaid Regular
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,825
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Florida
Reputation Power: 279
|
July 25th, 2003, 09:01 PM
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
(#12)
|
|
Dell XPS 630 User
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,161
Join Date: May 2002
Reputation Power: 153
|
July 25th, 2003, 09:17 PM
I would keep Windows for starters. Than for what Windows OS to go with, I would say XP Pro. I also have XP Pro on every computer but my laptop and have had nothing but problems. I have XP home on my laptop and see no difference. It is just as stable for me. But if you want to *buy* a copy of XP Pro, give me a PM I have a very, very, very, very, very cheap place to get your hands on a *real* copy*)
|
|
|
|
(#13)
|
(#14)
|
|
Black Mage Power.
![]() Posts: 1,019
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WA, USA
Age: 24
Reputation Power: 135
|
July 25th, 2003, 09:53 PM
XP Pro (corp ed) rules. lol at the mac, bad choice, tho i need to learn to use them better.... XP pro is stable, pretty (though I know that doesn't matter to everyone), and can be fast (not as fast a linux, but eh, oh well). Linux is fast and customizable, but not so easy to install or use for longtime windows people, tho there is LOTS of help avaliable online. If you do go with Linux, make sure you don't have a WinModem, that causes LOTS of problems... Personally, I duel boot Linux Mandrake, and Windows XP Pro.
How's about them apples?
|
|













Linear Mode