(#1)
|
(#2)
|
|
Zeropaids nipple
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,698
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: purgatory
Age: 23
Reputation Power: 823
|
October 30th, 2009, 11:10 PM
Quote:
http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=55492 |
|
|
|
|
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
(#5)
|
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
|
Mm Mm Mm Barrack H Obama
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,910
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA
Reputation Power: 274
|
November 2nd, 2009, 03:10 AM
Quote:
In simple terms, “Normal” would be, if you invest $1 you have to make $1 to get back to 0, to increase the GDP you need to make more than that $1. The way the GDP accounts for government spending is totally biased, it’s much tougher on the private sector spending and like comparing apples to oranges. A 3.5 percent growth in the 3rd quarter “sounds good,” that’s an increase of around $150.3 Billion but let’s hold off on that party. The Bureau of Economic Analysis emphasized that the third-quarter advance estimate released is based on source data that are incomplete or subject to further revision by the source agency. The "second" estimate for the third quarter, based on more complete data, will be released on November 24, 2009. I sure hope it’s different from those last job estimates that were off by the Thousands! But anyways, using this incomplete data, to those paying attention, “people who write the ticker tape” these numbers include government spending “not normal” and just happens to be around $174 Billion dollars (your stimulus at work) So, it turns out the amount of cash the government injected in the economy happens to “exceed” the current GDP increase but they call this a GAIN? I don’t know where you or these economists you speak of went to school, but where I went this is a “$23.7 Billion loss”, without any interest tacked on, Opps…!! But we still have Obama’s 2009 record deficit of $1.4 Trillion, an increase of 212% over last year, four times the previous record of 2008 and the worst year on record since World War II. And, as long as we’re talking about what is “normal,” normal is that government cost estimates/projections aren’t worth the paper they are printed on, never have been and never will be. They’re largely bogus, government programs rarely cost what is predicted. So, we “know for a fact” these estimates/projections will be much higher. You must understand the Government has no money of its own it produces absolutely nothing,, (well, a lot of CO2 I guess) only what it confiscates in the form of Taxes to pay off this debt, and let us not forget the interest on that debt? FYI, according to the (CBO) Congressional Budget Office, the interest payments on government debt this year alone will be $172 Billion. Now Obama has promised not to raise taxes on Americans making less than $250,000 a year, you remember that 95% don’t you, sticking the other 5% with the tab. Those who just happen to create 70% of the so badly needed private sector jobs that would show some realistic GDP growth. One year in where “Hope n Change” has come, it has been incremental, not the stuff of a glorious presidential legacy. Obama's "mission accomplished.”... ![]() . |
|
|
|
|
(#8)
|
|
AKA IceCube
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,919
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Igloo Country?
Reputation Power: 411
|
November 2nd, 2009, 01:53 PM
Quote:
I agree on the sentiment that it sure as hell doesn't feel like we are out (I haven't seen the stats in Canada) and it won't for a long time, but at least the rich people will be getting richer again. For the most part, that's all who politicians, regardless of which side of congress they sit at, really care about these days anyway. |
|
|
|
|
(#9)
|
|
Gopher kill self?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,138
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Crackivegas, Washington
Age: 31
Reputation Power: 802
|
November 2nd, 2009, 02:35 PM
Definitions and facts mean nothing in the face of operating a machine that is nothing more than anti-government, and amplifies it's anti-government stance in the face of Democratic administrations and majorities.
These people don't want democratic rule, rule of the people. They want aristocratic, bureaucratic rule of corporations. And that's the truth of who holds the power in a republic - in other words a government of selected citizenry. That being said, the US was originally a republic - republican government is definitely business friendly, as it's the businessmen who run it. Then again, I don't think you could really call our system of "he who spends the most money campaigning" democratic. |
|
|
|
(#10)
|
(#11)
|
|
Mm Mm Mm Barrack H Obama
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,910
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA
Reputation Power: 274
|
November 5th, 2009, 01:28 AM
Quote:
You got that right........... ![]() Big Government didn’t make this country what it is, and the Democrats won’t give up until they have everyone in the country dependant upon that Big Government which is their “Operating Machine.” ![]() . |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zeropaid's Album Reviews Thread | tamarisk | Music | 28 | March 21st, 2004 12:20 AM |
| e-Mule USA | Charles Keating | General Discussion | 6 | March 17th, 2003 11:49 AM |
| USA Attacks IRAQ on 27 february :( | Christoph | The Lounge | 62 | December 31st, 2002 04:10 PM |












aint even hit the fan yet....








Linear Mode
