PDA

View Full Version : The Law and how it relates to us as a community


steve15
April 19th, 2003, 04:38 PM
Man Pleads Guilty to Internet Piracy of Star Wars Film

The United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California announced that Jason Everett Spatafore, a/k/a Dis-man, 25, of Phoenix, Arizona, pled guilty today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero to a one count information charging criminal copyright infringement (Internet film piracy) in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(c)(3).

In the information filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office, Mr. Spatafore was charged with having committed criminal copyright infringement (Internet film piracy) in that he willfully infringed a copyright by reproducing and distributing by electronic means copies of parts of the film Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace.

According to the plea agreement, between November 3, 1999, and December 13, 1999, the defendant willfully infringed a copyright by reproducing and distributing by electronic means copies of parts of the film Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace. He did this by posting copies of parts of the film on various web sites so that others could download copies of the film from the Internet. Further, he encouraged others to download copies of the film from those sites. Between November 3, 1999, and December 13, 1999, other individuals in the Northern District of California downloaded copies of parts of the film from the web sites where the defendant had posted the film.

The maximum statutory penalty for the offense which the defendant pled guilty to is one year imprisonment and a fine of $100,000. However, the sentence in this case will be dictated by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of factors, and will be imposed in the discretion of the Court. Mr. Spatafore is scheduled to be sentenced on March 23, 2001, at 10:30 a.m. by Magistrate Judge Spero in San Francisco.

This prosecution is the result of an investigation by agents of the FBI, along with the Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (CHIP) Unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office. Ross W. Nadel is the Assistant U.S. Attorney who is prosecuting the case.

steve15
April 19th, 2003, 04:41 PM
United States Attorney's Office Creates Computer Crimes Section



SACRAMENTO--United States Attorney John K. Vincent today announced the creation of a Computer Crimes Section to prosecute high-technology and intellectual property offenses.

The new section will handle the prosecution of crimes such as computer intrusions, denial of service attacks, virus and worm proliferation, Internet fraud, and telecommunications fraud. Prosecutors in the new section will also be responsible for prosecuting intellectual property offenses, including copyright and trademark infringement, software piracy, theft of trade secrets and economic espionage.

The newly created section is a product of the Department of Justice's dedication to fighting computer-related and intellectual property crimes by the creation of specialized prosecutorial units. In addition to prosecuting high-technology offenses, prosecutors in the Computer Crimes Section will be responsible for providing regional training programs to increase expertise among federal, state and local law enforcement.

The Computer Crimes Section will also work to promote positive working relationships with the high-tech community to encourage victims to report computer crime and intellectual property offenses to law enforcement. Because the Eastern District of California is home to numerous high-tech companies, major universities and military bases, it has become a popular target to cybercriminals.

The Computer Crimes Section will be headed by Assistant United States Attorneys Christopher Sonderby in Sacramento and Jon Conklin in Fresno, each of whom has been focusing on prosecuting complex computer crimes cases. Mr. Sonderby has prosecuted significant Internet and computer fraud cases, including the first Internet shill bidding case in the country (involving the sale of a fake Richard Diebenkorn painting on eBay for $135,000) and a $50 million dollar international fraud case involving the sale of "prime bank" notes by the Tri-West Investment Club over the Internet. Mr. Conklin has also handled a host of Internet fraud and computer intrusion cases, including cases in which individuals hacked into computer systems of businesses and intentionally destroyed files, and a significant copyright case involving misuse of software products of the Microsoft Corporation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark L. Krotoski, who will also be in the section, has prosecuted and investigated prominent computer hacking cases, including a pending prosecution of alleged Russian hacker Aleksey Ivanov for a host of computer-intrusion offenses, as well as a case involving thousands of bootlegged video-tapes that is one of the first nationwide prosecutions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

"We have been focusing on cybercrime for some time now," said United States Attorney Vincent. "It is an area of growing concern, however, and we intend to attack it even more aggressively. These prosecutors, because of their training and experience, bring a high degree of expertise and professionalism to the Computer Crimes Section, and they are dedicated to vigorously prosecuting those responsible for cybercrime in the district."

Inquiries can be made to Christopher Sonderby in Sacramento at (916) 554-2827 and to Jon Conklin in Fresno at (559) 498-7272.

NOTE: It does not say anything about P2P or file sharring

notbob
April 19th, 2003, 05:16 PM
that's because it has absolutely nothing to do with p2p

this guy worked at lucasfilm and saved rough cuts, digital footage etc. to his hard drive

he had a basement full of goodies when he got busted selling it on ebay

Monyak
April 24th, 2003, 03:20 PM
Steve,

While its nice to read on current P2P news, it probably would be a better idea if you wrote a commentary about what that article has to do with P2P and its effects on our community.

Put a URL in the post directly linking us to that specific news article if you think its important enough while writing a commentary article.

Otherwise, I cant understand why you post 2 different news articles you found over the web and spam them here.