PDA

View Full Version : Hollywood Alters Movies


a604cutie
April 19th, 2003, 10:08 AM
Hollywood alters movies to foil camcorder pirates

'Forensic watermark' system uses light flickers unseen by eye"


LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Hollywood sends enforcers with night-vision goggles into movie theaters and puts metal detectors outside advance screening rooms, but still the industry can't stop pirates from recording films and selling illegal copies before their theatrical debuts.

The problem is that the pirates are adopting ever more sophisticated technology, using tiny camcorders in purses and digital recorders about the size of a fountain pen.

Some handheld computers "have an attachment that can record up to 122 minutes," said Jeffrey Godsick, executive vice president of marketing at 20th Century Fox. "Well, that's a whole movie in many cases. You can take the attachment and run it through a small hole in a tie or a shirt."

This is big business. The Motion Picture Association of America estimates studios lose more than $3 billion per year from piracy in various forms. So the movie industry is trying to fight back with a high-tech solution of its own.

Cinea LLC, which created an encryption system for DVDs, and Sarnoff, a technology research firm, are developing a system to modulate the light cast on a movie screen to create a flicker or other patterns that would be picked up by recording devices, making the resulting images unwatchable. The disruptive flickers would be unseen by the human eye in the movie theater.

The "forensic watermark" system is designed to be used with digital projectors, which show movies stored on computer discs rather than traditional 35-millimeter film. Only a small number of theaters have digital projectors, although it is expected that most theaters will go digital by the end of the decade.

Sophisticated Countermeasures

The research is funded by a $2 million grant from the Advanced Technology Program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency.

The technology takes advantage of the fact that the human eye and camcorders see the world differently. For example, a computer screen constantly refreshes an image, creating bars that travel across the screen. A camcorder picks up those bars, but not the naked eye.

Researchers are mindful that creating too rapid a flicker could trigger seizures in some people. They also discovered that using the flicker to write words across the image, such as "Copy," are not disruptive enough.

"It turns out that text isn't that annoying," said Robert Schumann, Cinea's chief executive. "Also, if it's just a static image, it's easier for the pirates to take out."

This technology would be a major improvement over the industry's current measures of trying to block pirate recorders, including night-vision goggles and metal detectors. Some of the piracy is an inside job: A pirate bribes a projectionist to set up a tripod in the projection booth.

"It is a system that will not stop camcording," said Ken Jacobsen, director of worldwide anti-piracy operations for the Motion Picture Association of America. "The best we can do is try to keep it out of the marketplace before a full domestic release."

Still, the industry knows that whatever technological gains are made over pirates will eventually be thwarted, requiring even more sophisticated countermeasures.

"There is a lot of money in piracy," Jacobsen said, "so it is worth people's efforts to try and defeat security."



Article from CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/biztech/04/19/camcorder.piracy.ap/index.html)

notbob
April 19th, 2003, 10:28 AM
like i said before--the real pirates work for the industry--i've seen dvd rips of all sorts of movies that were meant for "oscar consideration only"

the ones that are recorded in theaters are done by the projectionists, hooked into the soundboard

digital cameras on customers are not a real problem--those are not the copies circulating on p2p nets

they need to look at their interns, employees, maybe even executives if they want to stop p2p distribution

a604cutie
April 19th, 2003, 11:44 AM
I agree 100% with you on that. It's definately not a bunch of people walking into the movie theatres with handcams filming, because with each theatre I have been at, there have always been those ushers that walk around before, during and after the movie, or watching from the top balcony on people.

It's definately the employee's who are making these copies and putting them out for the public. Especially screeners, they are for the staff to view before the public even gets to see the movie, and their floating all over the net.

But I guess they have to blame someone, and maybe they just don't want to look towards their own people for doing this.

.::BeatFactory::.
April 19th, 2003, 01:18 PM
I am required to watch the screener message "This is for award consideration only." at least 2 times per movie :) uh oh... MPAA is knocking on my window...:mellow

a604cutie
April 21st, 2003, 01:21 PM
I hate that stupid message "This is for award consideration only.". Dam Them! lol

CCSDUDE
April 21st, 2003, 02:23 PM
Notbob....yup..

All the Managers and such being forced to run movies and work the downstairs bit (non-union stuff) are sure to grab some extra cash by sneaking someone up their and letting them patch into a cheap monitor via RCA's or XLR.

As for the screeners....every one I've seen so far...was fucked beyond repair...I didn't even bother burning them.

They were all semi-high budget movies...yet they did the go b&w the color...then the bar at the bottom..annoying as hell.

Funny..only screener I picked up that was totally clean with the exception of 2 or 3 really blended text shots of "Property of WB" was the second HP movie....which by my count should have been laced with loads of shit to keep it off the streets in any useable form.

As for DLP systems....they'll never really come around till DLP actually PAYS for everything...lol

Each projector costs between 120 and 140 thousand...the theaters don't wanna spring for it...since once they do if they don't pay up for their copy the copyright owner can just not renew their 'license' on that copy. With 35mm prints they can screw whoever they want over and run it whenever they wish. Plus...I've already seen DLP systems...not as 'secure' as they think...you could have copies better then DVD quality on the streets before it even gets run for the press.

vikram_mohan
April 21st, 2003, 02:48 PM
Poor them those that put money in trying to break P2P