PDA

View Full Version : What Bout Winamp 2.91 ???



ferrarimodena360
April 18th, 2003, 08:40 AM
Hey i hated v3 so back to 2.79........now just upgraded to 2.91, ya guys tried it ? Download 2.91 (http://classic.winamp.com/download/index.jhtml)

:fire

LUCIFER{OS}
April 18th, 2003, 08:50 AM
Thats the 1 I'm using right now.

Rickio
April 18th, 2003, 10:17 AM
So how is winamp 2.91?
I tried 2.90 and it was buggy so I went back down a version.

Evil_Dweller_01
April 18th, 2003, 10:18 AM
Winamp 2.91 kicks ass...
I recommend it to anybody hesitating to switch from 2.81

Tremaine
April 18th, 2003, 10:38 AM
2.91 the best ive been using it for a while its 2.81 with the good of 3

Ken17625
April 18th, 2003, 11:03 AM
I just upgraded from 2.90 to 2.91 and I must say there really isn't any noticable differences. Just a few bug fixes and such.

Rahwgwar
April 18th, 2003, 12:34 PM
Yeah, I don't notice any immediate differences either. I guess I'll have to fiddle around with it.

Tags still seem to be screwed up.

serrebi101
April 18th, 2003, 01:07 PM
I am using 2.91, but they HAVE to fix there asf, or asv, don't really know the spelling of that file type, streming play back!

nasrules
April 18th, 2003, 01:24 PM
none of em, jus usin wmp9.....i love it! hah!

Djm912
April 18th, 2003, 01:27 PM
If the first Winamp 2.9 was any indication, 2.91 should be pretty good for me.

MusikBeatz23
April 18th, 2003, 01:54 PM
Im gonna update... from 2.90(i like this version) to 2.91(i dont see why theres an upgrade needed version)

isus
April 18th, 2003, 03:51 PM
i use winamp 2.9. i read the changelog, and it doesn't look like anything major i need. so i will just wait until something important does happen.

Macaonasa
April 18th, 2003, 04:27 PM
I'm using Quintessential Player from http://www.quinnware.com/news.html.

Better than WinAmp.

Evil_Dweller_01
April 18th, 2003, 04:37 PM
Why would you want to continue using an older version such as 2.9? There seems to be a lot of bug fixes and stuff and I think everybody should upgrade..

You don't want to be left with an old version do ya?

wesr
April 18th, 2003, 04:39 PM
does 2.91 support the same kind of skinning that v3 supports.....thats one of the only reasons i use v3

i also like QCD player......but the only prob i have with it is that it doesnt have a media library like winamp 3....so if they got a media library i would definately use it

Tryptoboz
April 18th, 2003, 04:46 PM
I will continue to use 2.81 because I don't need the video capabilities with 2.91. Just more stuff to get in my way.

Evil_Dweller_01
April 18th, 2003, 04:53 PM
I love the video support in 2.91

Anyway, it's optional during installation so you can upgrade without video support.. (don't know why though)

Plaguewielder
April 18th, 2003, 05:20 PM
I just upgraded to 2.91 to avoid coming across a bug that may or may not be in 2.90. It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to minor updates.

I'm really hoping more skinners create decent skins that include Winamp 2.9x's library feature.

hawkburn
August 30th, 2003, 05:10 PM
Originally posted by Evil_Dweller_01
I love the video support in 2.91

Anyway, it's optional during installation so you can upgrade without video support.. (don't know why though)

I always thought of Winamp as a audio player, and liked to keep it that way, I use other programs for video.

But every man (and woman) is entitled to their opinions, with the exception of non-democratic countries.

`MythicCow`
August 30th, 2003, 07:06 PM
i recently upgraded to winamp 2.95 , seems like no one knows that winamp 2.5 exists???

Ken17625
August 30th, 2003, 07:07 PM
winamp 2.95

i recently upgraded to winamp 2.95 , seems like no one knows that winamp 2.5 exists???


I believe its still an alpha, correct?

Dividend
August 30th, 2003, 08:26 PM
http://www.ntfs.org/comments.php?id=7533&catid=1

:-)

Julian
August 30th, 2003, 08:59 PM
I use 2.91 when i use windows, 3 series sucks.

Ken17625
August 30th, 2003, 09:02 PM
Ah, sorry about that.

Winamp 5.0 is in alpha, not 2.5.