View Full Version : the definitive: kazaa vs. winmx
View Full Version : the definitive: kazaa vs. winmx
isus
February 24th, 2003, 07:40 PM
a few rules:
do not argue about which is best.
post which you voted for (and not much else).
if you use something else, make another poll.
i want this to stay friendly, no arguing like in the other threads.
Theinfamousone
February 24th, 2003, 08:26 PM
For software, cracks, and hacks, TV shows, and popular items (movies and music), there is nothing faster than Kazaa. End of story.
For everything else there is BCDC++.
For all of you shouting "viruses", yes there is an occasional virus if you are a complete moron and download a video with a single source that is called "britney spears.vbs" and is 496KB. Actually nowadays there is so much antivirus filters built into Kazaa that they don't come that way anymore.
You can download pretty much any R rated and most PG-13 movie that came out in the last 5 years at 150KB/s or faster.
And I have downloaded more complete series of sci fi TV shows in a matter of days then you can shake a stick at.
Just try to get every episode of any TV show on Winmx or even DC, you'll be waiting a long long long time.
(I said this in the other Kazaa thread. But I like it so much I thought I would use it here too.)
Psilaxs
February 24th, 2003, 08:44 PM
KaZaA ++ ALL THE WAY
No 16 day long queues
chipperrox
February 24th, 2003, 08:51 PM
i just got sick of waiting in line on winmx
Wolfie
February 24th, 2003, 09:03 PM
I used to use winmx more but since it became queue city I am using kazaa more these days.
Galileo
February 24th, 2003, 09:19 PM
there is an occasional virus if you are a complete moron...
(I said this in the other Kazaa thread. But I like it so much I thought I would use it here too.)
Just the data. CLICK to see the worms and viruses that currently contain code to infect KaZaA and its users (including some specifically for KazaaLITE users. Note: These are Not all the viruses that infect Kazaa, these are *just* the ones that *specifically* infect KazaaLITe and Kazaa and its users.):
KAZAA: ==> http://sophos.com/search/index.cgi?...ish&terms=kazaa
Compare to Winmx: ==> http://sophos.com/search/index.cgi?...ish&terms=winmx
Compare to gnutella: ==> http://sophos.com/search/index.cgi?...&terms=gnutella
Compare to IRC: ==> http://sophos.com/search/index.cgi?...glish&terms=irc
The number infecting KazaaLITE/Kazaa is upwards of 40 now:
Example: "W32/Hantaner-A is a worm and virus which prepends itself to files found in the download folders of KaZaA and Internet Explorer. By infecting files in the KaZaA download folder W32/Hantaner-A may spread through peer-to-peer file sharing networks. "
1. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Blinkom-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32blinkoma.html
2. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Igloo-15
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32igloo15.html
3. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Benjamin-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32benjamina.html
4. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Surnova-D
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32surnovad.html
5. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Kingdom-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32kingdoma.html
6. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Forlorn-D
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32forlornd.html
7. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Surnova-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32surnovaa.html
8. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Surnova-E
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32surnovae.html
9. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Surnova-B
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32surnovab.html
10. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Surnova-F
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32surnovaf.html
11. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Merkur-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32merkura.html
12. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Duload-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32duloada.html
13. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Surnova-C
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32surnovac.html
14. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Duload-C
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32duloadc.html
15. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Pepex-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32pepexa.html
16. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Gibe-D
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32gibed.html
17. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Lolol-D
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32lolold.html
18. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Lolol-C
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32lololc.html
19. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Lolol-B
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32lololb.html
20. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Oror-B
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32ororb.html
21. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Oror-K
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32orork.html
22. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Hantaner-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32hantanera.html
23. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Oror-L
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32ororl.html
24. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Lolol-E
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32lolole.html
25. Sophos virus analysis: VBS/Cian-C
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/vbscianc.html
26. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Lolol-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32lolola.html
27. Sophos virus analysis: W32/KWBot-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32kwbota.html
28. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Spear-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32speara.html
29. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Duni-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32dunia.html
30. New worm touts more unauthorised Catherine Zeta-Jones snaps, reveals Sophos Anti-Virus
New worm touts more unauthorised Catherine Zeta-Jones snaps, reveals Sophos Anti-Virus
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/articles/zetajones.html
31. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Axam-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32axama.html
32. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Systro-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32systroa.html
33. Sophos virus analysis: PuppyLayer-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/puppylayera.html
34. Sophos virus analysis: Bat/Cyseq-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/batcyseqa.html
35. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Avril-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32avrila.html
36. New worm provides sad snapshot of virus writer psyche, says Sophos
New worm provides sad snapshot of virus writer psyche, says Sophos.
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/articles/duload.html
37. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Avril-C
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32avrilc.html
38. Not all viruses are successful, however much they try..
Not all viruses are successful, however much they try..
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/articles/dunia.html
39. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Oror-Fam
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32ororfam.html
40. Sophos virus analysis: W32/Appix-A
Sophos virus analysis
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32appixa.html
41. Virus articles
Virus articles
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/articles/
42. Sophos virus analyses
View viruses by name - W
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/index_w.html
43. Sophos virus analyses
View viruses by type - Win32 worm
http://sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/index_w32worm.html
Yep. That would mean about 10% of 5million, or about a half million morons. lol.
Theinfamousone
February 24th, 2003, 09:29 PM
Oh not this again.
Sockfulloflove
February 24th, 2003, 09:36 PM
FT just because of winmx's queues.
Wolfie
February 24th, 2003, 09:37 PM
Originally posted by isus
a few rules:
do not argue about which is best.
post which you voted for (and not much else).
if you use something else, make another poll.
i want this to stay friendly, no arguing like in the other threads.
I guess that whole no argument thing went down the drain. Big suprise.....:mellow
bobhss
February 24th, 2003, 09:49 PM
Kazaa Lite ++ finds me everything I look for. I checked out WinMX once, looked at it it's interface and determined it wasn't for me.
Siskabush
February 24th, 2003, 10:11 PM
I loved WinMX's incredible speed, and vast search results.
But then came the loooooooooooooong queues, and kinda turned me away from the network for now.
The new WinMX is supposed to kill that autoenterqueue for more sources makin the queues shorter.
But until then, I am K++ all the way (with soulseek as backup for rare techno)
Using those 2 proggys, i can find anything.
endersgame21
February 24th, 2003, 10:28 PM
Like Theinfamousone said, it is real easy to stay away from viruses. Just look at what has the most sources and seems to be the right size. If you are looking for The Lord of the Rings, don't download the one that has only 1user and is only 264 Kb. Download the one that is 713,000 Kb and has 30 users or whatever.
Galileo
February 24th, 2003, 10:35 PM
Yes, the large one that has 713,000Kb is the virus. Since viruses can be any size, as you know.
And since viruses replicate and spread, it will have lots of users.
endersgame21
February 24th, 2003, 10:44 PM
Good job Galileo. I am glad to see that someone at ZP is learning. You deserve a gold star.
Mel_Smiley
February 25th, 2003, 12:07 AM
For over 1000 full length porn movies winmx gets my vote!
PatientSaint
February 25th, 2003, 12:34 AM
Mel_Smiley
For over 1000 full length porn movies winmx gets my vote!
lol !i said winmx... i've never had too bad a problem with queues myself really and i'd wait for quality songs unlike FT. that and Rarer tracks(ty former AG users!)
isus
February 25th, 2003, 01:36 PM
Originally posted by Wolfie
I guess that whole no argument thing went down the drain. Big suprise.....:mellow
ok, lemme edit that rule:
i'm not arguing to any kazaa users why it sucks.
i know i can get what i want faster, and that is what is important to me. some people dont like winmx bc of the queues... they just dont understand how to get around them. not my problem, do what you gotta do.
at least we are all sharing. i hope. unless you are a leech.
r_xq
February 25th, 2003, 01:57 PM
Galileo, for you to bore the arse off us again by telling us that Kazaa is overloaded with virii is just plain wrong.
"there is an occasional virus if you are a complete moron" is pretty close to the mark. and maybe its a good thing that these idiots download a virus if it means it finally convinces them to get around to installing decent anti-virus software and a firewall
wingnut2600
February 25th, 2003, 02:30 PM
Kazaa++ is pretty good.
I have used WinMx quite a bit, but since Kazaa rid themselves of the bitrate limit there are actually many good music files available on FT. There are just so many people on it that it is somewhat easy to find the music that i am searching for (but still not that easy).
Downsides... you aren't always getting what you ask for, but (if you look at how many people have something, what the extended info is and how rare it is) you are almost always going to be able to find what you are looking for. Plus, you can just get sig2dat info if you are worried about viruses.
There is no chat on Kazaa and most of the viable options do not have a well implemented chat prog, whcih is good for being turned on to new stuff.
WinMx is good, but I am on a modem and do not have the patience to wait in a queue.
I guess that I am not bothered by viruses and fakes since I mostly just DL music... (I am always frightened by the amount of shit out there that should not be .exe yet is)
Galileo
February 25th, 2003, 02:34 PM
Read it and weep, buddy.
And by the way, a music file with extension ending in .mp3 can also infect you. Not just .exe or .vbs.
(Now we'll see who knows their stuff, and who doesn't and says you can't get infected by an mp3. lol.)
r_xq
February 25th, 2003, 03:02 PM
Galileo, with your obvious excess of testosterone and machismo you would be better of taking up a sport rather than using Zeropaid as your outlet.
got 3000 mp3s on my system, no sign of any virus. guess im the lucky one
Psilaxs
February 25th, 2003, 03:03 PM
You cant get infected, the MP3 itself cannot infect your computer, HOWEVER, there was a problem awhile back with winamp and i think WMP which allowed a script to be run in the ID3 tag that would launch users to a specific website and instal a trojan, and that only happend to the people who did not have their active X set at a safe level, (Also download on demand in I.E is another thing to make sure you have set right)
And that problem is long since gone
An MP3 itself cannot infect you because the computer does not execute the code, it merely reads it, and sends out an audio signal.
The MP3 doesnt give the computer any instructions either, the software that decompresses the MP3 gives the computer all the data it needs to use the files.
matstao
February 25th, 2003, 03:25 PM
Winmx is a better program. Kazaa has more users.
Theinfamousone
February 25th, 2003, 03:34 PM
Originally posted by matstao
Winmx is a better program. Kazaa has more users.
I think we can all agree with that. Although they both definately have room for improvement, Kazaa isn't even trying. Hopefully PFT will end that problem.
Last night I downloaded every single episode of Spiderman The Animated Series from Kazaa. Saved me $40 from buying them on eBay. Good luck doing that on Winmx.
isus
February 25th, 2003, 04:40 PM
Originally posted by nomaan
Tired of this virus BS.
Had Kazaa since it was born. When there was about 100 users. Since, I have not got a single virus. I dont even have a virus scanner. Just scan for viruses sumtimes every couple months or year, not a single virus.
**blah blah blah. edited to save you time**
SEE a PATTERN........
Notes to take: when downloadin
- download files with many sources
- small kb to 1mb files are usually viruses or sum bs
- if it sounds to good to be tru (j-lohomevid.exe) (superhacker.scr), it probly is fake and/or a virus.
- You cant get a virus unless you initilize or open a file
and u can always double chek by scanning the individual file you just downloaded.
Thats it
Thats all
THE END
i hope you didnt just finish that off with 'THE END' in an attempt to end this thread. cuz i know a newbie ain't gonna be screwing with a thread i started to see the numbers here at zp.
if you said the end to finish the ppl discussing viruses, it aint your decision where to end that either. deal with it.
Galileo
February 25th, 2003, 05:50 PM
Good ways to get infucted:
download files with many sources
yes, since a virus' primary function is to spread, it will have a lot of sources.
You cant get a virus unless you initilize or open a file
Yeah, good idea, so you download a lot of stuff that you never open. And download songs that you never play and apps you'll never try and movies you'll never watch. lol. Good strategy. haha.
By the way, you can get a virus without 'initializing' or ever opening the virus file. If you don't know this, you might want to read up a bit.
small kb to 1mb files are usually viruses or sum bs
This is like about the 5th time I've seen newbie people post the false information that all you have to do is not download small files thinking large ones can't be infected. lol. When someone says this you immediately get that same realization as when you're all sitting watching a Baseball game, a guy hits a homer, and somebody jumps up and says "Yay! Our team just got a touchdown!"
One more time for the Record: viruses can be inside any size file, and even pad files so that the byte size is identical to the original, and even the date is patched to indicate no modification.
This can be discreetly hidden inside a large archive, iso, or anything, hidden among 100's of other files deep down in a subfolder where you will never notice it.
(Just an example, a virus scoops out bits from WINSCK32.DLL, inserts itself, pads the file so that its size is identical to the original WINSCK32.DLL and modifies the dates back to the original creation date, last modified, and last accessed dates, of the real WINSCK32.DLL, it's then packed inside an archive in a subfolder and for example named "Norton AntiVirus 2003 - Full Version.iso" 92.4 megabytes ..or whatever app, whatever size file, it can be anything, you won't know.)
u can always double chek by scanning the individual file you just downloaded. ..I dont even have a virus scanner.
Hmm. One minute you don't have a virus scanner, then you say you only scan once a year, and then all of a sudden you scan every file? Interesting how you do that when you don't even have a virus scanner. lol. You're all over the map. If you're gonna bs, at least make it consistent. hehe.
Chuckling at your BS. -FIN-
isus
February 25th, 2003, 06:55 PM
thank you. you are fast becoming a good ally in this battle, galileo.
Ken17625
February 26th, 2003, 09:35 AM
I read Psilaxs's statement, and i'm waiting to see if old skorchie here will respond to that.
I like to get the majority of my files some time today. Therefore I use Kazaa++ or DC.
nomaan
February 26th, 2003, 03:28 PM
THE END
My computer blew up too many viruses........................................... .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ........................................lol....... ..not my fault you can't read or understand
Evil_Dweller_01
February 26th, 2003, 03:39 PM
Wtf?
Dude.. Galileo proved you WAY wrong and you mock him?
You know he's right and you are wrong but you just can't admit that somebody more inteligent in this kind of matter responded to your post and shut you down so you make a stupid ass post with 50k periods.. shows how smart you are
Lamourlady
February 27th, 2003, 01:42 AM
WinMX.
period.
i think we all know the reasons i choose this app by now.
eh?
geezzz, nan......stfu about winmx already.
well.....this is a p2p forum.
and the vote was either or.
no?
yep.
WinMX it is.
and if u haven't figured out how to deal with queues, then all i can say is.........omg!
isus
February 27th, 2003, 06:15 AM
lol... nomaan, you are a dumb newbie.
the end.
MAtT_Zero
February 27th, 2003, 07:05 AM
(dup post)
MAtT_Zero
February 27th, 2003, 07:12 AM
I know Galileo... what about a virus scanner!?!?
And no... I don't mean running on-access scanning 24/7 on every file on your PC... I mean selective scanning your download directory.... and that's only if users are too stupid to see their MPG file has an EXE extension or something. Viruses? Who cares? The more dumb users get them the better - it might just teach them to be a little less stupid next time!
Oh, and BTW - K++ every time. Used to use both, but WINMX queues are just ridiculous these days.
Galileo
February 27th, 2003, 07:20 AM
a file ending in .mpg (even without any .vbs on the end) can infect you.
And yeah, survival of the fittest. I shouldn't be taking my time to help them if they don't want to listen. lol.
Hehe.... There's this website that's hilarious... They have all this stuff against Lawyers. And they have all these articles on there about how Lawyers are f*cking up the genetics of humanity by suing everyone for stuff like not printing "Caution: Coffee may be hot" when some dork wad spills it on themselves and burns themself.
They say that by instituting all this safety stuff for the brainless, that Natural Selection is not taking its course, and the dumbasses that normally would be killed by doing things like sticking their tongue into the electrical socket, are surviving and passing their dumbass genes onward, dumbing down the world. LOL.
It was pretty funny.
MAtT_Zero
February 27th, 2003, 07:31 AM
um - do you wanna explain how a file with a MPG extension can infect you? It can be a virus that has been named .MPG, but opening it won't do anything cos it's not executable.
Galileo
February 27th, 2003, 07:33 AM
Watching the video can infect you.
MAtT_Zero
February 27th, 2003, 07:43 AM
er... um.... and you get your information from... where? Let me introduce you to a PC...
Watching a movie CANNOT infect you. A virus needs some kind of executable program to run... EXE, COM, PIF, SCR, VBS or other scripts.... a virus cannot infect you via MPG or MP3.
I'm a technical analyst and one of my responsibilities is looking after the AV solutions on all our companies workstations servers and internet gateways... and if I ever see an MPG infect someone I'll eat my sombrero.
Now... a file called britney.MPG.EXE with the user not turning-on the display of common extensions... that's a different matter.
Galileo
February 27th, 2003, 08:02 AM
I wouldn't hire ya then.
Get out your sombrero.
MAtT_Zero
February 27th, 2003, 08:07 AM
it's ready... but believe me, I'll need more than your word on that. Better be linking-up or shutting-up ;-) Post away...
PornMaster
February 27th, 2003, 08:40 AM
Galileo, You are so wrong, i've never seen someone as wrong as you.
The only extentions that can infect you are,.exe .com .pif .doc .vbs and .scr
It is IMPOSSIBLE for an mp3 to infect you same goes for a mpg or avi, those are NOT executables, therefor they CANNOT infect you.
endersgame21
February 27th, 2003, 08:46 AM
MAtT_Zero and Pornmaster are right. There is now way in hell a mp3 or mpg file is a virus and cannot under any circumstances infect you. It is impossible and always will be impossible.
Galileo
February 27th, 2003, 08:55 AM
LOL. newbs.
Hmm. I could win some money on this one.
Care to put some money on that?
PornMaster
February 27th, 2003, 09:05 AM
Calling me a newbie eh?
Well, Take a look here (http://www.techtv.com/callforhelp/print/0,23102,3015142,00.html) for file extenions that can be executed, and here (http://www.custom-code-factory.com/viruses.htm#HARMLESS) for file extenions that are harmless!
Well, This newbie just proved you wrong!
MAtT_Zero
February 27th, 2003, 09:09 AM
For one, your lack of posting a link to any proof gives you away. For two , the fact that a major AV manufacturer like Network Associates doesn't even enable scanning of MP* files by default gives you away (or are THEY wrong too huh?), and three - you're just plain wrong - cos if you knew anything about computing you'd KNOW what you are saying does not make sense.
I'll bet you your reputation on this board - if you have any left after the nonsense you're posting in this thread :-)
nasrules
February 27th, 2003, 09:16 AM
kazaa, itd be kmd over winmx if it came down to it anyway.
King_Zamunda
February 27th, 2003, 09:53 AM
>I'll bet you your reputation on this board - if you have any left after the nonsense you're posting in this thread :-)
Ooh , thems sound like fighting words to me. Galileo.
Forget the money, your pride is at stake now,
And Isis, what's with this poll? Please don't tell me you started this on my behalf?
Galileo
February 27th, 2003, 10:14 AM
Ahh, yes.... BOOTIE COTHRAN, the world renowned virus expert, and custom programmer. HAHAHA!
Don't hire him either.
Any 14 year old dorkmeyer can put up a site saying whatever, and name themselves BOOTIE BIGBOTTOM. I'm sure you'll find a lot of sites and discussion boards claiming you can't get infected by a file ending in .mp3 or .mpg, just like you see people here on Zeropaid saying viruses are only in small files. But it's incorrect.
LOL. This is too funny. This is where you separate the men from the little boys and find out who really knows their stuff and who doesn't.
I'm gonna see who else wants to put their name up on the newb list saying you can't get infected from a file ending in .mp3 or .mpeg
LOL.
Rickio
February 27th, 2003, 02:28 PM
It is possible for a mp3 to give you a virus. But that was patched already by winamp and microshit.
I would venture to guess if a mp3 can be manipulated , so can a mpg. But I don't think it is likely with the security patches that now exist.
Oh I didn't bother to do a google search. Let's let our brother geek here prove it.
Rickio
February 27th, 2003, 04:45 PM
Originally posted by nomaan
I hate ignant people who cant admit their wrong!!!
and juss cuz its says newbie on side name descriptions means nothin, been around for a while just dint sign up till now.
NO USE ARGUIN WITH PEOPLE WHO WONT ADMIT THEIR WRONG.
I am not on galileos side. just mentioning the truth.
both winamp and microsoft came out with security patches for a exploit that was possible with mp3 files when using winamp or wmp.
don't take my word go to winamp or microsoft and read about it.
there is also another variation kinda like a trojan idea. where you download a file that a infected mp3 can invoke. It is not classic virus but in fact if your screwed your screwed if you don''t have the current patch.
Psilaxs
February 27th, 2003, 05:51 PM
Rickio, it wasnt the MP3 file itself, it was the id3 tag/metadata attached to it.
Want me to prove it? i will post a small mp3 file with a virus placed inside of it. And let ppl download it. We will see whether it infects or not. it wont. I have done it when all this Mp3 viri hype was at its highest.
MP3's are not executed compiled or decompiled, and do not give the computer any instructions.
As i have stated, that is the mp3 players job, is to instruct the P.C on how to handle the file. An MP3 is not naitive to windows, whereas .exe .vbs .scr are.
But it is pssible for an mpg to redirect you to a website, (it has happend to me) and if you active x controls are not set properly then yes, you can get infected that way, but it was not because it was imbedded in the MPx file itself.
*WHISTLES* "Hey Krell!! Where are you!?!?
You wanna come and help clean up this mess? lol
isus
February 27th, 2003, 05:57 PM
Originally posted by King_Zamunda
>I'll bet you your reputation on this board - if you have any left after the nonsense you're posting in this thread :-)
Ooh , thems sound like fighting words to me. Galileo.
Forget the money, your pride is at stake now,
And isus, what's with this poll? Please don't tell me you started this on my behalf?
haha, anybody who starts a thread for you would be an idiot. im not that lame.
i started it bc i wanted to know. is that ok with you? ya dumbassed newbie... the world does not revolve around you.
and i think galileo could take your sorry ass.
he's right. itd be nice if you weren't newbies, you would have seen the news about mp3's that could infect your system thru winamp or wmp. duh.
anything stored in ram could go awol on your system and fuck it up. that would be a virus. loading an mp3 into ram is the same ram you load an exe into. and an mp3 player uses the same cpu to play the mp3 as a virus uses to email all your friends.
Mel_Smiley
February 27th, 2003, 06:02 PM
How the hell do mpgs redirect you to websites? That has happened to me a few time recently. Seems to be an epidemic on kazaa right now.
tipple
February 27th, 2003, 07:16 PM
I use and like both... If I can't find what I want on one I use the other, simple. Variety is the spice of life.
matstao
February 27th, 2003, 07:26 PM
Originally posted by tipple
I use and like both... If I can't find what I want on one I use the other, simple. Variety is the spice of life.
well said, tipple. each is good for certain things. it's not a competition.
Siskabush
February 27th, 2003, 07:29 PM
LOL, the closest thing to a mp3 virus was that exploit in winamp and WMP.
The only thing that gets the mp3 file decoded is the audio card.
And the audio card CANNOT open a exe file. other crap takes care of those.
Attaching a virus to it and renaming it to mp3.exe will infect you.
As long as the name is .mp3 and that only, nothing will happen.
ADD ME TO THE NOOB LIST lol
Sockfulloflove
February 27th, 2003, 07:44 PM
.avi and .mpeg can always be renamed. so its very possible to get a virus.
tipple
February 27th, 2003, 08:14 PM
Attaching a virus to it and renaming it to mp3.exe will infect you.
As long as the name is .mp3 and that only, nothing will happen.
This is why you should use the show full file extensions option winmx.
matstao
February 27th, 2003, 08:58 PM
& galileo comes back from banned death to deliver the potential knock-out blow
tipple
February 27th, 2003, 09:28 PM
Yeah, come to think of it, I do remember reading how it is possible to embed the active scripts in files that were considered safe.
King_Zamunda
March 2nd, 2003, 06:41 AM
I always had faith in ya lad ;)
You've got a good track record when it comes to stuff like this. So the smart money - if there was any - would've been on you.
Guess Matt needs to do a little brushing up on this subject or see his p45 being waved in his face by his present employer.
But I've learned something here. I seem to remember viewing a porno clip I downloaded, I think it was Tiffany Minx. And my web browser opened up. It may have been for spam advertising purposes only, hopefully...
Theinfamousone
March 5th, 2003, 01:14 AM
The funny part is that you've wasted 10 times more time writing that stupid post than I have spent fixing virus problems in the last 2 years that I've been using Kazaa.
BTW NO ONE CARES! No one thinks any more of you than they did before you wrote that.
Evil_Dweller_01
March 16th, 2003, 08:41 AM
Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
Kazaa sucks and if you use it
Too bad for you
**shrugs just like ken**
Evil_Dweller_01
March 16th, 2003, 08:44 AM
Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
If you think winmx sucks
you suck too!
damnit.. im too hyper today
collideous
March 16th, 2003, 09:34 AM
Wow Galileo!
Anyway, so how about those two proggies? Here's my experience:
Kazaa: can't find a darn thing.
WinMX: can find it, but can't download.
Ken17625
March 16th, 2003, 11:43 AM
Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
Kazaa sucks and if you use it
Too bad for you
**shrugs just like ken**
Don't make me invoke the DMCA.
joemama1
March 16th, 2003, 02:42 PM
Originally posted by Evil_Dweller_01
Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
Kazaa sucks and if you use it
Too bad for you
**shrugs just like ken**
Try this....Roses are red
Violets are blue
WINMX SUCKS
Because of the damn queue!!
joemama1
March 16th, 2003, 02:45 PM
Originally posted by Evil_Dweller_01
Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
If you think winmx sucks
you suck too!
damnit.. im too hyper today
Try this also...Roses are red
Violets are blue
WINMX DOES SUCK
AND SO DO YOU!
Evil_Dweller_01
March 16th, 2003, 03:30 PM
No.. I was right the first time
joemama1
March 16th, 2003, 09:52 PM
Originally posted by Evil_Dweller_01
No.. I was right the first time
I don't think so!
endersgame21
March 16th, 2003, 10:32 PM
Hey galileo, this whole virus thing started because I said I had never got a virus because it was easy to tell which ones were viruses and which ones were not. So you have proved that you can get infected by large files or files that end in .mp3, etc. but I still make sure I download files that have many users so I still have not and never will get a virus off of kazaa. And it isn't that likely that you were find viruses like the ones you described anyways.
ronniebravo
March 25th, 2003, 03:19 PM
Both.
EvilHamsterOfDeath
March 25th, 2003, 04:14 PM
kazaa all the way :fire
isus
March 25th, 2003, 04:48 PM
Originally posted by joemama1
I don't think so!
he has 250 more posts than you, so hows about you shut up newbie. sorry, but newbies should not try to flame people who actually know what they are doing.
this has nothign to do with the fact you obviously like kazaa. just dont be some bitchass little man running around trying to get on people cuz you think your smart.
bc you aren't
Ken17625
April 8th, 2003, 11:54 AM
I use Dogster.
With the dogster teleporation community, I can find files, before they even exist! Dogster utilizes instant time travel technology(future only in this release) to go into the future to look for those "hard to find" goat porn movies. Next version will contain the ability to go back in time; even to the hayday of NAPSTER!!!
I LOVE YOU HOMEYA!!! Will you marry me?
RACKnRAIL
April 8th, 2003, 11:56 AM
Originally posted by Psilaxs
KaZaA ++ ALL THE WAY
No 16 day long queues
I have to agree with that. I had WinMX long before Kazaa, but hate waiting in queue for so long. I still like WinMX for rare files that I can't find on Kazaa. I also found a lot less bogus files on WinMX too. I will keep WinMX and I sure hope a new version of it comes out soon. Until then, Kazaa wins my vote.
isus
April 8th, 2003, 12:47 PM
Originally posted by RACKnRAIL
I have to agree with that. I had WinMX long before Kazaa, but hate waiting in queue for so long. I still like WinMX for rare files that I can't find on Kazaa. I also found a lot less bogus files on WinMX too. I will keep WinMX and I sure hope a new version of it comes out soon. Until then, Kazaa wins my vote.
lol, you mention the next winmx... there was some news that they would have it out soon, but its been a while... *sigh*
Evil_Dweller_01
April 8th, 2003, 12:55 PM
See the guy said the new version was going to be out in 2-6 weeks..
ITS BEEN 10 WEEKS SO FAR!!!!
Yet, no version available
Although you know Frontcode, they always bug everything out to make sure there are no problems before releasing a new version or beta.. and still, there are a ton of new features for the upcoming version so it does require significant amount of testing :fire
Lamourlady
April 9th, 2003, 06:44 PM
the one thing we can count on with winmx.......is that a new version....will be released.
just can't wait though...lol.
should be da bomb!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hey, ken......u r killing me, man!
Evil_Dweller_01
April 9th, 2003, 07:56 PM
Originally posted by Lamourlady
the one thing we can count on with winmx.......is that a new version....will be released.
just can't wait though...lol.
should be da bomb!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hey, ken......u r killing me, man!
Oh I agree with you totally!
The new version will be DA SHIT!
We just have to wait through the pain.. I go to winmx.com everday hoping for something..=/
Well.. the day will soon come!
Good things come to those who wait...
Lamourlady
April 9th, 2003, 08:05 PM
Originally posted by Evil_Dweller_01
.. I go to winmx.com everday hoping for something..=/
so we can count on u to let us all know then.
;)
DETROIT
April 9th, 2003, 08:16 PM
WinMx.
All the way for mp3's and movies.:playboy
Anenga2
April 28th, 2003, 03:46 PM
WinMX is utterly useless. Why use it when you can use K++? Kazaa has like 20 times the users of WinMX and has way less upload system problems than WinMX does.
WinMX is on the slippery slope downwards to extinction. It had a good life =)
If your using WinMX, get Shareaza, BitTorrent & K++. Your all set.
mh2360
April 28th, 2003, 03:58 PM
Fasttrack/Kazaa is approaching 5 million users, NO OTHER p2p network can compete with this. BUT!!!, Kazaa IMHO is only really useful for music and porn... Not many 2 CD AC3 DVD rips, Games that are ripped (no music , videos etc), Not many PSX(2) CD images, NO PC game CD images, Hardly any zipped high quality albums... The Edonkey/Emule network may be slow in comparason, but it is still the best IMHO....
isus
April 28th, 2003, 04:05 PM
Originally posted by Anenga2
WinMX is utterly useless. Why use it when you can use K++? Kazaa has like 20 times the users of WinMX and has way less upload system problems than WinMX does.
WinMX is on the slippery slope downwards to extinction. It had a good life =)
If your using WinMX, get Shareaza, BitTorrent & K++. Your all set.
funniest thing i have ever heard: winmx is on its way to 'extinction'... haha. if anything, kazaa is moving towards extinction. they found the supernode server...
besides, with the exception of the participation level (and more adware/spyware), kazaa has not been seriously updated since it was sold to sharman a while ago.
i dont think sharman has a clue about how kazaa works, or what's going on.
o, and to the whole "why use winmx?" bc it doesnt have all the worms. (i dont remember anything about k++ stopping new worms... it might block them once they are known and an update is released, but...)
and also, winmx can remember column sizes and positions. it can do multiple searches. it has chat rooms integrated into it. etc etc.
Mel_Smiley
April 28th, 2003, 04:49 PM
Kazaa is fo fast because every single user shares the same files. There is never much new added because kazaa users, in general, just don't know how to rip a CD, moveie, etc. You have to wait with QueMX, but unlike Kazaa, when you do get connected with a rare file, your gonna stay connected instead of getting a small chunk immediatley, then going to remoteque. Mx connections are much more stable
Evil_Dweller_01
April 28th, 2003, 05:01 PM
Wow.. i couldn't agree more with Isus and Mel_Smiley.. Winmx is the shit and will stay the shit!
Anenga.. how the hell is winmx going toward extinction? I never heard of queues killing a program to the part where it can't function anymore as that is what you are implying...
Anyway, I don't know why but Shareaza is the one with 600 sources for a fucking file and a transfer rate of .45Kb/s..which is sad. if winmx had 20 sources it would download faster
I still use shareaza and winmx and the others on my sig... but come on? that problem has to be fixed
Anyways.. long live winmx!
Anenga2
April 28th, 2003, 05:14 PM
Originally posted by isus
funniest thing i have ever heard: winmx is on its way to 'extinction'... haha. if anything, kazaa is moving towards extinction. they found the supernode server...
That doesn't mean they can take down Kazaa. Trust me, Kazaa won't be shut down unless the developers get bored/don't make profit off of it. WinMX, on the other hand, doesn't have the legion of lawyers and what not that Kazaa has.
besides, with the exception of the participation level (and more adware/spyware), kazaa has not been seriously updated since it was sold to sharman a while ago.
It's been updated more than WinMX has. Granted, Kazaa hasen't had any ground breaking releases, but nor has WinMX. It's a hell of a lot more popular than WinMX is. Kazaa earns profit, and the WinMX don't communicate much online regarding it's software, which concludes (to me, anyways) that they're inactive developers which don't have much intrest in really continuing it. The people I knew who used WinMX no longer use it anymore because of the queues and bad GUI.
i dont think sharman has a clue about how kazaa works, or what's going on.
I'm pretty sure they do, you on the other hand...
o, and to the whole "why use winmx?" bc it doesnt have all the worms. (i dont remember anything about k++ stopping new worms... it might block them once they are known and an update is released, but...)
Worms? I've never gotten a virus on K++ or any Kazaa software. If your stupid enough to get a virus like that, you deserve it.
and also, winmx can remember column sizes and positions. it can do multiple searches. it has chat rooms integrated into it. etc etc.
lol, Don't even bring up the GUI card with WinMX. WinMX is probably the worst GUI I've ever seen. Plus now with it's queues/underground trading transition... it's pretty much, as I said, useless. Chat rooms is a subsidary feature for a P2P client, who cares about chat when you can't download crap.
isus
April 28th, 2003, 07:25 PM
Originally posted by Anenga2
1. That doesn't mean they can take down Kazaa. Trust me, Kazaa won't be shut down unless the developers get bored/don't make profit off of it. WinMX, on the other hand, doesn't have the legion of lawyers and what not that Kazaa has.
2. It's been updated more than WinMX has. Granted, Kazaa hasen't had any ground breaking releases, but nor has WinMX. It's a hell of a lot more popular than WinMX is. Kazaa earns profit, and the WinMX don't communicate much online regarding it's software, which concludes (to me, anyways) that they're inactive developers which don't have much intrest in really continuing it. The people I knew who used WinMX no longer use it anymore because of the queues and bad GUI.
3. I'm pretty sure they do, you on the other hand...
4. Worms? I've never gotten a virus on K++ or any Kazaa software. If your stupid enough to get a virus like that, you deserve it.
5. lol, Don't even bring up the GUI card with WinMX. WinMX is probably the worst GUI I've ever seen. Plus now with it's queues/underground trading transition... it's pretty much, as I said, useless. Chat rooms is a subsidary feature for a P2P client, who cares about chat when you can't download crap.
1. you kazaa fanboys are cute. sharman will always turn a profit on kazaa bc they dont do any work on it. and they send out the same adware, which means they make money, offa the people who use regular kazaa.
2. kazaa earns a profit? maybe bc they want money... notice how winmx doesnt have spyware or adware? they dont need a profit to keep their servers running.
3. im pretty sure you wish you did. haha. "you on the other hand"... if sharman knows so much about how ft operates, then why don't i see multiple searches, or better columns, or anything better? kazaa has looked the same for years, and probably worked the same too.
4. did i say "you"? if i did, i meant people in general. if i didn't, stop putting words in my mouth.
5. you'd be the only one not smart enough to be able to use winmx and dl files without queues.
why do so many lame ass whiny little kiddies say they use kazaa bc of winmx's queues? if you had any brain, you would know how to simply reconnect to a better peer, and then find the file without a queue. works for me.
dont whine so much, you make me hate you even more.
CCSDUDE
April 29th, 2003, 03:21 AM
Originally posted by isus
1. you kazaa fanboys are cute. sharman will always turn a profit on kazaa bc they dont do any work on it. and they send out the same adware, which means they make money, offa the people who use regular kazaa.
2. kazaa earns a profit? maybe bc they want money... notice how winmx doesnt have spyware or adware? they dont need a profit to keep their servers running.
3. im pretty sure you wish you did. haha. "you on the other hand"... if sharman knows so much about how ft operates, then why don't i see multiple searches, or better columns, or anything better? kazaa has looked the same for years, and probably worked the same too.
4. did i say "you"? if i did, i meant people in general. if i didn't, stop putting words in my mouth.
5. you'd be the only one not smart enough to be able to use winmx and dl files without queues.
why do so many lame ass whiny little kiddies say they use kazaa bc of winmx's queues? if you had any brain, you would know how to simply reconnect to a better peer, and then find the file without a queue. works for me.
dont whine so much, you make me hate you even more.
For once I gotta defend him....he's not a Kazaa fan boy, dude.
He's a Shareaza fan boy..... =D
Anenga2
April 29th, 2003, 03:29 AM
Originally posted by isus
1. you kazaa fanboys are cute. sharman will always turn a profit on kazaa bc they dont do any work on it. and they send out the same adware, which means they make money, offa the people who use regular kazaa.
I'm definatly not a Kazaa "fanboy". Hell, I hardly use it. But that doesn't mean it's not better than WinMX. WinMX, IMHO, does not work anymore.
2. kazaa earns a profit? maybe bc they want money... notice how winmx doesnt have spyware or adware? they dont need a profit to keep their servers running.
I believe WinMX earns profit elsewhere (like Shareaza). Organizations usually work faster/more when money is involved, hence my logic regarding the WinMX developers. They don't need a profit, because there is nothing to profit off of. They do, however, need resources (Money) to pay for the servers, obviously.
3. im pretty sure you wish you did. haha. "you on the other hand"... if sharman knows so much about how ft operates, then why don't i see multiple searches, or better columns, or anything better? kazaa has looked the same for years, and probably worked the same too.
Wish I did what? Know how Kazaa works? Why would I care? :P I'm pretty sure Sherman or it's developers know how it's own software works/operates. I don't think they add multiple searches because it will take more network traffic, columns or "anything better"... maybe their view of new good features differs from yours. WinMX hasen't really improved at all IMO.
5. you'd be the only one not smart enough to be able to use winmx and dl files without queues.
That doesn't make much sense. If I can't do it, damn sure a hell of a lot of other people can't either. I don't go on P2P proggies to wait days to download a file I want, if that's what your implying needs to be done on WinMX ("Just wait around") then it's a failure (especially with it's marketshare).
why do so many lame ass whiny little kiddies say they use kazaa bc of winmx's queues? if you had any brain, you would know how to simply reconnect to a better peer, and then find the file without a queue. works for me.
Reconnecting to peers really doesn't do anything, that doesn't reduce queues. It may be able to give you a better "Horizon" or something, but I don't think it would have much effect. Why would you have to reconnect peers to be able to simply download stuff? Seems unreasonable to me.
dont whine so much, you make me hate you even more.
Whine about what? I think you need a dictionary =)
Theinfamousone
April 29th, 2003, 03:36 AM
Evil Dweller, you said it with Shareaza, I don't know if it flat out lies to you or what, but it doesn't matter how many sources you have for a file, 500+, it doesn't matter, the transfer rates are rarely very good.
Kazaa on the other hand is amazing, it connects you to 4 or more sources and you're flying at 100KB/s on average.
You're right, admittedly Kazaa does a little too much transfer breaking up, that is a downside. For some reason I upload sections of a file to one person, and I upload the entire sections to another guy. I'd rather be the guy that is getting the entire thing. I have the entire series of rare TV shows like the Wonder Years etc., and so the people that actually connect to me, I'd like to see them get the whole file rather than transfer 6MB at a time to 100 different people.
And yes, I think that the average Kazaa user doesn't do as much ripping as the average Winmx user, but who said you're only allowed to use one P2P app?
Winmx is dying, it's dying because the protocol is too fragile, when the guy above you is slow or whatever, the people below him can't get files, which means that people can't get files from them, which means that the network gets exponentially slower.
Cyberpukish
April 29th, 2003, 03:53 AM
winmx=japanese stuff
kazaa network=mainstream stuff
Mel_Smiley
April 29th, 2003, 04:15 AM
Hey I didnt say to use one network. I use 4 myself and kazaa is in there. Just depends on what im looking for bro.
isus
April 29th, 2003, 12:51 PM
Originally posted by Anenga2
I'm definatly not a Kazaa "fanboy". Hell, I hardly use it. But that doesn't mean it's not better than WinMX. WinMX, IMHO, does not work anymore.
you sound like a fanboy
I believe WinMX earns profit elsewhere (like Shareaza). Organizations usually work faster/more when money is involved, hence my logic regarding the WinMX developers. They don't need a profit, because there is nothing to profit off of. They do, however, need resources (Money) to pay for the servers, obviously.
i'm sure they make money somewhere. frontcode is probably just a name of some little company, and all the developers have normal jobs writing other software.
Wish I did what? Know how Kazaa works? Why would I care? :P I'm pretty sure Sherman or it's developers know how it's own software works/operates. I don't think they add multiple searches because it will take more network traffic, columns or "anything better"... maybe their view of new good features differs from yours. WinMX hasen't really improved at all IMO.
at least winmx's gui changed between versions. kazaa went from 1.7 to 2, with no significant changes. they dont even fix the scrollbars so they adjust to fit the window. that's just lazy.
That doesn't make much sense. If I can't do it, damn sure a hell of a lot of other people can't either. I don't go on P2P proggies to wait days to download a file I want, if that's what your implying needs to be done on WinMX ("Just wait around") then it's a failure (especially with it's marketshare).
um, no, you dont wait days. you press refresh, then search for the file again. i always find a sourcefor a file, after doing this just once.
Reconnecting to peers really doesn't do anything, that doesn't reduce queues. It may be able to give you a better "Horizon" or something, but I don't think it would have much effect. Why would you have to reconnect peers to be able to simply download stuff? Seems unreasonable to me.
um, never said it reduces queues. you get a new horizon, and therefore, a better chance of finding the file. lol. seems unreasonable to me to hafta dl an illegal p2p client to escape adware.
Whine about what? I think you need a dictionary =)
i have several. an english, a french-english, and a spanish-english.
Anenga2
April 29th, 2003, 01:04 PM
Originally posted by isus
you sound like a fanboy
I guess anyone that disagrees with you is a fanboy then.
i'm sure they make money somewhere. frontcode is probably just a name of some little company, and all the developers have normal jobs writing other software.
That's exactly what I mean, they make money elsewhere. They have their own jobs etc., which (I'm sure) takes priority over WinMX.
at least winmx's gui changed between versions. kazaa went from 1.7 to 2, with no significant changes. they dont even fix the scrollbars so they adjust to fit the window. that's just lazy.
WinMX only seems to change their entire protocol, and it just gets worse and worse. What did they change in the GUI? Add more buttons?
um, no, you dont wait days. you press refresh, then search for the file again. i always find a sourcefor a file, after doing this just once.
If you say so.
um, never said it reduces queues. you get a new horizon, and therefore, a better chance of finding the file. lol. seems unreasonable to me to hafta dl an illegal p2p client to escape adware.
People consider it all illegal, the U.S. definatly thinks Kazaa is illegal, so it's like saying your illegally stole a crack pipe from a druggie.
i have several. an english, a french-english, and a spanish-english.
English would be fine. Might as well throw out the French ;)
Ken17625
April 29th, 2003, 01:25 PM
Don't make me sue you both for the use of the term "Fanboy".
The DMCA backs me on this. You must both pay me royalties for your continued use of "Fanboy" or else you'll be hearing from my lawyer.
isus
April 29th, 2003, 01:48 PM
Originally posted by Anenga2
I guess anyone that disagrees with you is a fanboy then.
That's exactly what I mean, they make money elsewhere. They have their own jobs etc., which (I'm sure) takes priority over WinMX.
WinMX only seems to change their entire protocol, and it just gets worse and worse. What did they change in the GUI? Add more buttons?
If you say so.
People consider it all illegal, the U.S. definatly thinks Kazaa is illegal, so it's like saying your illegally stole a crack pipe from a druggie.
English would be fine. Might as well throw out the French ;)
it takes to long to seperate everything:
no, you just sounded ultra-super-pro-kazaa... i dont mind if you say tha you like kazaa bc ____, but it just sounded like you were trying to shit on winmx, when kazaa has its own problems too.
ok, we agree on the 2nd paragraph...
i say so. it works for many of my friends too.
good example. but the druggie who owns the crackpot could still sue you. they have enough money to battle the riaa, so i would guess they have enough money to chase you too.
lets not argue about france. my french teacher is pretty cool (she's from france...) and she agreed with the war. everybody has a different opinion. although i think america is still waiting to see proof of wmd...
isus
April 29th, 2003, 01:51 PM
Originally posted by Ken17625
Don't make me sue you both for the use of the term "Fanboy".
The DMCA backs me on this. You must both pay me royalties for your continued use of "Fanboy" or else you'll be hearing from my lawyer.
what if you happen to be too poor to pay royalties??
matstao
April 29th, 2003, 04:50 PM
Someone more creative than I should right a song named "kazaa fanboys". or even "KazAa FanboyZ"
That is the funniest damn 2-word phrase I've read in a while. Thanks Ken or Isus or whoever coined that one.
Ken17625
April 29th, 2003, 09:22 PM
kazaa fanboys
Someone more creative than I should right a song named "kazaa fanboys". or even "KazAa FanboyZ"
That is the funniest damn 2-word phrase I've read in a while. Thanks Ken or Isus or whoever coined that one.
ME ME ME ME ME. ALL MINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MINE I TELLS YA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oh, and it can be used as one word as well.
"Fanboys"
or
"Fan Boys" Whichever your in the mood to type.
matstao
April 29th, 2003, 09:53 PM
Originally posted by Ken17625
ME ME ME ME ME. ALL MINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MINE I TELLS YA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oh, and it can be used as one word as well.
"Fanboys"
or
"Fan Boys" Whichever your in the mood to type.
Cool. You get 1st dibs on creative royalties. All we need no is to find a gay-punk rock band to play some power chords & rhyme something like "kazaa boys" & "rubber toys"
g l i t c h
April 29th, 2003, 10:29 PM
KaZaA, but wear a rubber.
Kyle06
May 4th, 2003, 08:39 PM
KaZaa for me
Theinfamousone
May 5th, 2003, 01:51 AM
Actually, it sounds like legally speaking, the US is finally starting to see that these networks and their creator aren't what's bad, it's the bad apples that trade copyrighted material. Since they let Grokster and StreamCast get out of the courtroom alive.
Hopefullyin 10 years, P2P and the rest of the world will be able to coexist peacefully.
Greylin
May 5th, 2003, 05:45 AM
I think that I will stick to the original parameters set for this post and just vote (w/out quoting anyone or explaining why) for kazaa.
ROCKAMANIAC
May 10th, 2003, 08:44 AM
Thius has been done Billions of times Why even Bother !
isus
May 10th, 2003, 08:50 AM
Originally posted by ROCKAMANIAC
Thius has been done Billions of times Why even Bother !
bc this is the definitive, dingleberry.
actually, this is the only poll i have seen asking the straightforward question of which do you like more... so...
DETROIT
May 17th, 2003, 07:50 AM
WinMX all the way GUi is terrible but gets what I want with no hesitation. Q's are not a problem with me if you know how to get around them.:tol :blah
rainbowdemon
May 17th, 2003, 08:34 AM
Originally posted by Lamourlady
WinMX.
period.
i think we all know the reasons i choose this app by now.
eh?
geezzz, nan......stfu about winmx already.
well.....this is a p2p forum.
and the vote was either or.
no?
yep.
WinMX it is.
and if u haven't figured out how to deal with queues, then all i can say is.........omg! I like WinMx, but don't use it much anymore because of the queues. I'm up for any suggestions as to how to deal with them.
isus
May 17th, 2003, 07:59 PM
Originally posted by rainbowdemon
I like WinMx, but don't use it much anymore because of the queues. I'm up for any suggestions as to how to deal with them.
what you do is:
find the file you want. we will call it file a.
start to dl it. queue or not. let it go to remotely queued.
now right-click and select "search for alternates"
it will take you to the search window.
if it gives you an open source, stop here, but it usually doesn't, so...
go to the networks tab, press refresh
go back to the search tab and press search again.
i have never found a file this didnt work for.
Marty87354
May 17th, 2003, 08:39 PM
Where is a refresh button or function in the networks tab??? I can't find anything like this
isus
May 17th, 2003, 09:12 PM
Originally posted by Marty87354
Where is a refresh button or function in the networks tab??? I can't find anything like this
you hafta be connected to see it... otherwise it will be connect or disconnect...
if you aren't connected, then press connect
rainbowdemon
May 17th, 2003, 09:55 PM
Thanks, Isus. I will try that! :fire :fire
triniti
May 17th, 2003, 11:29 PM
I have never used really got WinMX doing anything great. But perhaps it's just my setup.
Mel_Smiley
May 18th, 2003, 03:46 AM
Did you try that Quickmx Trinity? Really helps me get Winmx started quickly. It used to take awhile before all my files would refind sources when I started Mx the next time. Now they que right up and even sometimes start up. lol
Im still having to stp quickmx after awhile because sometimes its causing an error and closes winmx. I suspect though, it could be a file mis-match causing the trouble. Or mayybe its just my crappy ME OS. With some refinement, quckmx is going to be a great tool.
Now where the hell is frontcode with the new version of Winmx??? Come on please let us know something
I think Ive had too long a night, I cant see straight! lol
triniti
May 18th, 2003, 02:29 PM
Originally posted by Mel_Smiley
Did you try that Quickmx Trinity? Really helps me get Winmx started quickly. It used to take awhile before all my files would refind sources when I started Mx the next time. Now they que right up and even sometimes start up. lol
Im still having to stp quickmx after awhile because sometimes its causing an error and closes winmx. I suspect though, it could be a file mis-match causing the trouble. Or mayybe its just my crappy ME OS. With some refinement, quckmx is going to be a great tool.
Now where the hell is frontcode with the new version of Winmx??? Come on please let us know something
I think Ive had too long a night, I cant see straight! lol
I will check out Quickmx, thanks!
Theinfamousone
June 8th, 2003, 05:12 PM
Ok, I'm trying it again, using the refresh thing. I was connected as primary, so before I couldn't figure out what people were talking about. Well, I've tried refreshing like 6 times and of course I'm still 102 in queue....goooooood.
isus
June 12th, 2003, 06:57 PM
Originally posted by Theinfamousone
Ok, I'm trying it again, using the refresh thing. I was connected as primary, so before I couldn't figure out what people were talking about. Well, I've tried refreshing like 6 times and of course I'm still 102 in queue....goooooood.
lol, that must be a VERY rare file. but im glad you figured it out :)
lemme put a modifier in my original statement:
"using the node hopping technique, i have never been in a queue for a MUSIC file."
Evil_Dweller_01
June 12th, 2003, 07:21 PM
Originally posted by isus
"using the node hopping technique, i have never been in a queue for a MUSIC file."
That's a bigg difference! lol
downloadalot
June 17th, 2003, 06:49 PM
Kazaa is king.
This thread makes no sense. It should be called Kazaa vs the rest.
What the fuck is winmx doing next to kazaa? This suggest that winmx is no1 challenger - but if anything is going to surpass kazaa, its more likely to be shareaza or something else.
Winmx = dead.
isus
June 17th, 2003, 06:57 PM
this is the type of stupid post i didn't wanna see here.
loser. grow up. and learn to count. gnutella has about half the users of winmx.
kazaa = 5 mill
winmx = 1 or 2 mill
gnutella = 400 thou
g2 even less
downloadalot
June 17th, 2003, 07:07 PM
Originally posted by isus
this is the type of stupid post i didn't wanna see here.
loser. grow up. and learn to count. gnutella has about half the users of winmx.
kazaa = 5 mill
winmx = 1 or 2 mill
gnutella = 400 thou
g2 even less
hola dont get mad. my post is up in your face weither you like or not. Shareaza is a good software - needs more users but the network is more reliable than winmx, - so for that reason, is a good candidate to become the no\1 p2p app when users leave kazaa.
Captain_FLX
June 17th, 2003, 07:07 PM
winmx = 1 or 2 mill
WINMX there's only probably about 500,000 people you can download from the rest is useless now on Kazaa there's 5 Million users and i Guarante you that there's ATLEAST 2,000,000 that you can download out of the almost 5 million
now on 1 or 2 mill too bad WinMX doesnt have a Counter to proove that if you have prooves please send it to me I want to see that with my own eyes.
Thanks!
Ken17625
June 17th, 2003, 07:39 PM
:fire
Oh mighty bouncing frog, whatever should I use?
And then the frog said unto me, USE THE C..........the IRC!