How about this idea?

[hoverbover]

I have started to share more movies lately, and that has led to long queuelists with people wanting only the movies. Where did the people who used to download my mp3:s go? Of course they don´t want to wait for eight hours just for a single mp3 file.

Why not have two separate queuelists for uploads. One main queuelist and one that lets you set a filesize limit, so that every person wanting a file wich size is below that limit is automatically placed in this other queuelist.

People wanting colour schemes always gets past the queuelist and that´s a good thing. But this idea would develop that thing a little further and give the sharer a little more control, wich I think is needed.

[Wolfie]

I like the idea of a separate queue list (one for large files and one for small files). It might be worth considering for the next winmx version.

[hoverbover]

Yes I hope the people at winmx consider it, because I sent them this advice some weeks ago, but didn´t get any feedback. I wonder what they think about it.

[AngusMcDuff]

I use WinMx strictly for movies.
Kaaza and Bearshare for mp3, very rarely i pull morpheous.
Funny all WinMx version runs fine its the Morpheous that crashes my system.

[AngusMcDuff]

BTW i run Kaaza and Winmx 24/7 works great . its just UL trhat you need to control . Kaaza is very aggressive when it comes to UL.. I usually give more bandwidth for people who upload DVD quality off me . sorry Kaaza.

[nutty_squirrel02]

Yeah, that's a good idea. I hope they impliment it. It would be good to be able to set multiple queue lists that range from nn MB to mm MB where any number of lists can be made and organized. Not only by size, but by file type also. That would be good.

[johnnyc102]

I was just thinking that the other day. I feel sad for those people trying to get a 2 meg file waiting behind like 15 movies. Ill bump them up if i notice, but duel queues would be way more efficient.