humuhumu
November 29th, 2002, 02:18 AM
Brief test to get an idea of Shareaza / G2 network against the 'normal' gnutella network.
1. Told Shareaza to use G2, G1 v0.4 and G1 v0.6 protocols. Connected to 4xG2 hubs / peers / supernodes (whatever you like to call them), 4xG1 hubs.
Search for 'britney' on all types of file, allowed to run for ten minutes.
Found 39158 nodes.
2. Same test, ONLY using the G2 protocol. Connected to 6 hubs (all G2 - all it could find after fifteen minutes of looking for eight G2 hubs). Same search, same length of time.
Found 18872 nodes (48.2% of total found before).
So on the basis of that search, it's looking around 50-50. Half of normal G2 / Shareaza results are from clients connected to the G1 protocol.
Not exactly scientific, and the search was done 5am EST, so should expect much higher numbers later on in the day, but gives an idea of the size of gnutella V G2 (or Mikes Protocol, or Shareaza or [insert name of choice]).
Will run the test again later if I get the time...
1. Told Shareaza to use G2, G1 v0.4 and G1 v0.6 protocols. Connected to 4xG2 hubs / peers / supernodes (whatever you like to call them), 4xG1 hubs.
Search for 'britney' on all types of file, allowed to run for ten minutes.
Found 39158 nodes.
2. Same test, ONLY using the G2 protocol. Connected to 6 hubs (all G2 - all it could find after fifteen minutes of looking for eight G2 hubs). Same search, same length of time.
Found 18872 nodes (48.2% of total found before).
So on the basis of that search, it's looking around 50-50. Half of normal G2 / Shareaza results are from clients connected to the G1 protocol.
Not exactly scientific, and the search was done 5am EST, so should expect much higher numbers later on in the day, but gives an idea of the size of gnutella V G2 (or Mikes Protocol, or Shareaza or [insert name of choice]).
Will run the test again later if I get the time...