Jorge
July 11th, 2007, 03:20 AM
With 74% of internet users saying they wouldn't mind viewing ads in return for free content, and 83% saying they would like a company who did so even more, record labels and advertisers may just find a legit use for P2P and file-sharing networks after all.
<p>A few days back it was reported how Sprint paid to have its logo embedded on copies of tracks from the hip-hop artist "Plies" which were then distributed on P2P and file-sharing networks for people to download for free. </p>
<p>Once the Sprint logo is embedded, it will be attached to the files forever and will be displayed
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/zeropaid?a=Am3X03"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/zeropaid?i=Am3X03" border="0"></img></a></p>
Read Full Article Here (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zeropaid/~3/132672697/SURVEY%3A+Users+of+File-Sharing+Networks+Don%27t+Mind+Ads+for+Free+Content )
<p>A few days back it was reported how Sprint paid to have its logo embedded on copies of tracks from the hip-hop artist "Plies" which were then distributed on P2P and file-sharing networks for people to download for free. </p>
<p>Once the Sprint logo is embedded, it will be attached to the files forever and will be displayed
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/zeropaid?a=Am3X03"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/zeropaid?i=Am3X03" border="0"></img></a></p>
Read Full Article Here (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zeropaid/~3/132672697/SURVEY%3A+Users+of+File-Sharing+Networks+Don%27t+Mind+Ads+for+Free+Content )