View Full Version : Which is the worst?
Signa
June 20th, 2007, 04:07 PM
So, I was just in my living room with the rest of my family and they were watching some shitty Hillary Duff film (I'm guessing its Material Girls, but I don't really care). Anyway, as the film is going on, I hear Duff's "Fly" start playing in the sound track with her still on screen, but she's not singing it or anything. So what I realized I was seeing was Duff's acting and singing at the same time as two separate instances. To me, this just looks really bad for a film, and shows a lack of intelligent soundtrack planning. I remember feeling the same with Daredevil and two Evenesence songs were in an otherwise random song selection. It also bothered me in Disney's Tarzan when Phil Collens did the whole soundtrack.
So I ask the rest of you, which is the worst thing you can do in a movie's soundrack?
CCSDUDE
June 20th, 2007, 04:52 PM
all of the above...ick I feel dirty just reading your description
Excrement_Cranium
June 21st, 2007, 03:08 AM
Naw, I wanna go back. Waaaay back. Back into time.
Worst: Actor singing on soundtrack.
Worst track ever in this style: Patrick Swayze - She's Like the Wind from Dirty Dancing
Lord_of_the_Dense
June 21st, 2007, 09:00 AM
I nominate everything in this thread.
Nothing but crap up there.
Excrement_Cranium
June 21st, 2007, 02:33 PM
Well, now you're in a shit sandwich!
CCSDUDE
June 21st, 2007, 03:01 PM
if this is a shit sandwich I must be the crustless white bread
Signa
June 21st, 2007, 06:11 PM
ive got no problem with a character singing a song in the sound track. there are plenty of movies that the characters are singers. that doesnt make the song worth hearing or watching being sung, but the act of it isnt lame. what bothers me about the above instances is that they are LAME. i dont think there is any possible way any of them can be executed properly that you can say afterwards "that turned out well." when a character sings, it can still work. look at most Disney movies.
CCSDUDE
June 21st, 2007, 10:27 PM
ive got no problem with a character singing a song in the sound track. there are plenty of movies that the characters are singers. that doesnt make the song worth hearing or watching being sung, but the act of it isnt lame. what bothers me about the above instances is that they are LAME. i dont think there is any possible way any of them can be executed properly that you can say afterwards "that turned out well." when a character sings, it can still work. look at most Disney movies.
if family guy can make a football headed cross dressing toddler singing with a talking dog catchy as hell anything is possible
but there are limits... I mean toy story music was funny as hell with lyrics like you've got a friend in me ...yeah randy his name is bill an dhe likes to spoon afterwords
cheta
June 22nd, 2007, 11:45 AM
deffinately actor singing own soundtrack WTF? kinda just seems like tehy wantan make more money than tehy already are acting
gorphon
July 8th, 2007, 06:40 AM
John Travolta and Olivia Newton-John are my cinematographic musical idols. All these others are just kiddies playing dress up.
Man I'm old.
jwsisliving1
July 8th, 2007, 06:45 AM
*nevermind
zite
July 8th, 2007, 08:10 AM
Family guy has earned the right to be allowed to break the boundries for what's acceptable and what's not :)
Signa
August 4th, 2007, 08:57 PM
family guy hardly has anything to do with this tread. sure, they made a few musicals, but that doesnt count as the lame acts listed above.
edit: why was this on recent posts? the last post was a month ago?
evilmegaman
August 4th, 2007, 10:20 PM
I would guess that someone voted.