I saw Spiderman 3 today

[fero]

hello...

i saw the movie today,and i think it was amazing :icon_thum

and i would like 2 know what's your opinion about it :icon_scra

[Mels_Smileys45]

Was it worth half a billion dollars?

[fero]

In fact , the movie is very good
but I do not believe that he deserves this amount

[Hath]

I can't believe it cost 500 million bucks to make! Thats just sick. It better be beyond incredible...

[fero]

i still dont know whyyyyyyyyyy ??

[Hath]

You don't know why what? Anyways, I'm in the process of downloading the latest and best quality Spider Man 3 movie. It better be good!

[etos45]

I disagree... I didn't like the movie in the least. Besides the HUGE drift away from the comic book that it was based on, I thought the special effects on Venom were awful. He looked like a cartoon that shouldn't have been there. It also jumped around too much. I know that I am biased on the fact that I'm a comic nerd and Spider-man is my all time favorite hero, but it's like they didn't even try to stay true to the comic this time. I mean, Gwen... why was she there? Why was she a model? They could have made that character Felicia (Black Cat) and she could have served the same purpose but actually of made sense. Why was Harry's Green Goblin a surfer dude? All my other complaints would be spoilers to the end of the movie, so I'll leave them out... but ARGH!!!!

[Hath]

Aww man. I just finished watching my downloaded version of the movie, and let me just say, IT FREAKING SUCKED!!! I don't know where that 500 million dollars went because there were 100 times more crazy action scenes in spider man 2. What a total dissapointment.

[MoonMan]

Spiderman 3 was just simply awful. I was cringing at the shitty dialog and shoddy script from beginning to end. Tobey Maguire was painfully bad in this movie (and I liked him in the first and second). I hope he liked his big paycheck, because he won't get many good movie parts after this.

I want my $9.00 back.

[wrestledude363]

I think the movie was pretty much awesome...Spiderman 2 was definitely better though. Anyone know if there will be another one?

[fero]

i said why and iam talking about 500 million bucks
and where is all money went i dont see anything in the movie deserve this cost
i like Spidy he is my superhero but 500 million $ thats sucks

[Hath]

I agree with you fero. There is nothing in spider man 3 that requires 500 million dollars to produce.

[etos45]

Well, I've been told that the Sandman might have eaten up a large bit of that money. Someone I know is really into all that digital animation stuff and she said the animating the sand grains or something was really difficult, or something. She couldn't understand why they put so much work into him and then next to nothing into Venom.

[bignerd972]

I totally agree w/ the folks who didn't like the movie. Too much CGI and too much of a drift from the comic series... Spiderman 2 was better

[fero]

Yeah thats right bignerd Spiderman 2 absolutly better than 3

[etos45]

I totally agree w/ the folks who didn't like the movie. Too much CGI and too much of a drift from the comic series... Spiderman 2 was better

I think so far that 2 is the only one that I've really liked at all. I've gotten to the point that I think the first one is okay, but I'll always watch 2 when it's on.

[onjen]

saw it and didnt like it... as the other two parts

[Feather]

well that saved me the time of seeing this one

[Feather]

well according to this article the movie production budget is only 248 million. and they made that back in the first 3 days.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070506/ap_on_en_mo/box_office

[shiburs]

the movie is very good

[karljack]

absolutly !!!

[fero]

its not bad and good movie , but do you think its worth that cost ? 500 million $

[thepuzzler]

This is why spiderman 3 sucks... (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJH2WEyIYtg)

[fantacola]

saw it and didnt like it... its boring movie i like the first and the second

[Lord_of_the_Dense]

I found my wife's and step-daughter's used tickets to SM3 today.

[fero]

the movie was for kids

[MoonMan]

the movie was for kids

I don't really agree with that. Most of the people I knew that were excited about Spiderman 3 were high school and college students.

[Lord_of_the_Dense]

Ahem..


i saw the movie today,and i think it was amazing
In fact , the movie is very good
i like Spidy he is my superhero

So what exactly are you telling us?


the movie was for kids

[shawners]

If you downloaded it, you can blame the crappy video and audio in the movie as down playing what could of been a great experience.. But if you see it at the theater, you know it wasnt the greatest. It was still too childish. The second one was way better and this one played on everyone cheering for spiderman, and being a stubborn prick who doesnt realize how much a fool he became.

[.:sp00ky:.]

hmmm spiderman 3

*too much crying
*shit film

1.4 out of 10

[Excrement_Cranium]

Haters!


Emo Peter Parker FTW!!!


I dug it. It was good.

Why was it good?

Captain America, anyone?

Yeah... quit yer bitchin.

[thepuzzler]

Peter Petrelli FTW!!! Fixed your typo.

[Shadowtester]

Was ok but not great and I was a huge spiderman comic fan I think the second 1 was better.

[Neildo]

Spiderman 3 was just simply awful. I was cringing at the shitty dialog and shoddy script from beginning to end. Tobey Maguire was painfully bad in this movie (and I liked him in the first and second). I hope he liked his big paycheck, because he won't get many good movie parts after this.

I want my $9.00 back.

I don't think i've paid for any of the Spiderman movies yet.

I agree first and second were good, but this one falls short. I liked Sandman though, I think they did a good job there. Underused him though.