View Full Version : Private BitTorrent tracker site rankings?
View Full Version : Private BitTorrent tracker site rankings?
soulxtc
March 26th, 2007, 06:03 PM
How are private bitTorrent sites currently ranked, (ie which are #1, 2 etc.) and how do you and others each determine their ranking?
Is for a story Im doing here @ ZP. THX
soulxtc
March 26th, 2007, 06:04 PM
To get started, I believe http://uk-t.org/ is a #5 level site, not sure why that is though. Tough to get into I presume?
optimus_prime
March 26th, 2007, 06:15 PM
well here's ranking maintained by buggyme and patriot foreve of fst, it is accepted widely as fairly accurate representation of supply/demand. some rankings are little off as they obvioulsy haven't included more recent wave of openings into calculation, but that's just couple of half-points around the middle. so...
This Scale Is To Rate Sites From 1 To 5
1 being the easiest to get an invite or account and 5 the hardest.
This has nothing to do with the contents of the trackers.
Ratings of trackers themselves are in the [#] tags.
Not all trackers will be in this list.
NOTE: THIS LIST SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN LITERALLY.
It's just to figure where each site stands (rarity-wise)
Do NOT ask the URL of the sites specified in this thread.
Level 1
These sites are open for sign ups. Any users looking to join any of those sites can simply go to the site and register.
Bitsoup[3.5] - ILoveTorrents[3] - Midnight Torrents[3] - docs.torrents.ro[3.5] - DVDseed and countless others...
Level 2
Accounts at these sites are very easy to obtain. If you ask for an invite/account here in this board - chances are you will get one for free.
Pisexy[3.5] - Demonoid[3] - TL[4.5] - iPLAY[4] - ST[3.5] - SCC[3.5] - FileZone[3] - FL[3] - DH[3] - HT[3] - ChronicTracker[3] - TD[3] - SITR[2.5] - XboxSky[4] - PussyTorrents[4] - Dimeadozen[4] - Bitspyder[3.5] - Filemp3[3.5] - Learnbits[3.5] - HorrorChannel[3.5]- KrayTracker[3] - TVJunkies[3] - UKNova[3.5] - Elbitz[3] - TvT.ro[3] - BitHDTV[3.5] - x264[3] - FinDVDR[2.5] etc.
2.5: RevTT[4] - TTi[3.5] - TorrentBits[3.5] - WB[3.5] - TauriTracker[3] - TB[3] - SoftTorrents[3] - PotUK[3] - A-L[2.5] - TVTorrents[4] - Audionews[3.5] - BlackCats[3.5] - TheVault[3.5] - ProAudioTorrents[3.5] - CO[3]- Brokenstones - AOM[3] - Music-Vids[3] - ExtremeBits[3] - BTMusic[3] - Goem ...etc.
Level 3
Accounts at these sites are harder to obtain due to various reasons. However - it is still fairly easy to get provided that you offer a site with the same value in return.
Swebits[4] - Snowtigers[3] - BitMe[4.5] - OiNK[4] - KG[3.5] - ThePlace[3.5] - HDBits[3.5] - VIPMusic[3] - RMVBusters[3.5] - - Sweloaders[3] - TS-Tracker[3] etc.
3.5: FSC[3.5] - Thor'sLand[3] - RP[3.5] - CZone[4] - PT[4] - Danishbits[3.5] - rSR[3] - BitMeTV[5] - IT[3.5] - etc.
Level 4
Accounts at these sites are quite difficult to obtain. It may take you a while to get into these sites.
NB[4] - SweDVDR[4] - TT[3.5] - Revolt[1] etc.
4.5: FB[4] - FTWR[3] - E***o[4] etc.
Level 5
Getting an account at these sites are very difficult if not impossible. Consider yourselves lucky if you have an account at these trackers.
FTN[5] - ScT[5] and U***[3]
numbers in squares are tracker ratings, based on content, speed and pretimes. obviously content is somehow subjective, especially around the middle, but you can be sure those with ratings 4-5 are superior trackers.
import_fighter
March 26th, 2007, 07:12 PM
its really a rarity scale...content wise some level 2 trackers are better than say level 4. but that is why the list has the content rating of each as well.
Scoobi]l[Doo
March 26th, 2007, 08:14 PM
I dont want the url of the rankings but can you write it in full words?Thanks, because i cant nothing begin with some short things like Scc, DH , HT, TD, SITR, TTi, FSC, RP, rSR, IT, TT , NB, FB, FTWR, KG and FTN... thanks :).Or is there any Legend of this :).Your answer will be appreciated.
david2232313
March 26th, 2007, 10:07 PM
thanks for new ratings
Dr_Green_Thumb
March 26th, 2007, 10:28 PM
#1 the almighty SCT
SoulXTC you dont want to write about UK-T utter rubbish
FTN #2 unless someone can invite there and I can make a fair comparison
redMonster
March 26th, 2007, 10:34 PM
I think FTN should be number 1, because nowadays ScT hasn't got great pretimes. It only has good speed. Very less releases, and pretimes many times worse than TL, etc. So I think FTN deserves no. 1.
The level of the tracker on FST is solely determined by its rarity mostly. Many poor trackers are above level 4 in that ranking system, like FTWR and Revolt.
heart_of_wantings
March 27th, 2007, 02:02 AM
i know a better pretimes site than ftn. for example stalker ,cnc3 was upped before at ftn/sct/tl. but its a secret :-)
optimus_prime
March 27th, 2007, 03:43 AM
as argued before, pretime isn't everything. there's no advantage in offering scene release 10 minutes before competition if your seeders don't have pipes to deliver, it doesn't matter when do you start the download but when do you finish it, and by that parameter sct will get you new release on your hard disk while others are still downloading.
and soul, you might want to move this thread to bt invite trading forum so it's not that much in the open :icon_thum
testicles
March 27th, 2007, 04:45 AM
If he's composing an article on this it will be quite open in the end anyway.
fargif
March 27th, 2007, 05:55 AM
I think Zeropaid members should come together and make our own top trakcer list.This list while is very good,doesn΄t meet everyone΄s vote here.This is from another forum and we should make 1 from us.
Dr_Green_Thumb
March 27th, 2007, 07:30 AM
I dont like the rarity ranking. I am all about content, speed and the people. I could find the elusive golden turd but its still a turd
ultimatet
March 27th, 2007, 10:45 AM
i being newbie here, cant get right with all these shortforms... could someone please enlighten me? which is ScN? which is E***? which is U***????
Bucktoof
March 27th, 2007, 11:20 AM
Hahaha, Dr_Green_Thumb, the elusive golden turd is still a turd.. haha
I like the idea of ZP creating it's own list like one of the above posters said.
CABALBER
March 27th, 2007, 01:19 PM
We must make a ranking 1-10.
DrReD
March 27th, 2007, 01:52 PM
number one ftn and sct
optimus_prime
March 27th, 2007, 02:59 PM
I dont like the rarity ranking. I am all about content, speed and the people. I could find the elusive golden turd but its still a turd
well it's not just a turd if you can trade it for golden goose is it? ;)
cervecero
March 29th, 2007, 09:26 AM
i love FTN #1 always....
AstonishingMonkey
April 2nd, 2007, 09:44 PM
what about for a golden egg?
saulin
April 3rd, 2007, 03:09 AM
Man that list is missing a lot of good trackers.... and yay I have one level 4.5 and a level 5 tracker :D
mcqwert
April 3rd, 2007, 06:50 AM
Hey, what does FTN and SCT stand for? I know you're not supposed to link them, but what are their proper names?
Kronithus
April 3rd, 2007, 07:51 AM
We must make a ranking 1-10.
You could multiply the old ones by two...
optimus_prime
April 3rd, 2007, 08:51 AM
Hey, what does FTN and SCT stand for? I know you're not supposed to link them, but what are their proper names?
revealing their names is frowned upon too, they are private sites and wish to remain secret. reason is their reputation tend to bring more unwanted attention either from law enforcement or from cheaters/leechers banging to come in.
that being said, zp has yet to make it's official stand about that, so here you go, those two are feedthenet and scenetorrents ;)
parkbenchi
April 3rd, 2007, 04:36 PM
There is a new one which should be lvl 4 at least. Those lucky few know which site I mean. It will not be mentioned by name or acronym....
wrestledude363
April 3rd, 2007, 08:13 PM
What sites should beginners start with?
MoonMan
April 3rd, 2007, 08:18 PM
There is a new one which should be lvl 4 at least. Those lucky few know which site I mean. It will not be mentioned by name or acronym....
If you won't even give a silly acronym, who cares?
soulxtc
April 3rd, 2007, 08:19 PM
So whats the criteria really, I mean who ranks them or is it just informal?
soulxtc
April 3rd, 2007, 08:20 PM
If you won't even give a silly acronym, who cares?
:P ............
LeetAdama
April 3rd, 2007, 11:31 PM
There is a new one which should be lvl 4 at least. Those lucky few know which site I mean. It will not be mentioned by name or acronym....
Seems like a bit of a waste of time to make a post like that, really... Come on, share :)
redMonster
April 4th, 2007, 12:16 AM
There is a new one which should be lvl 4 at least. Those lucky few know which site I mean. It will not be mentioned by name or acronym....You should not bother to post this if you are not willing to tell us the acronym. This doesn't make you smart as you must be thinking.
So whats the criteria really, I mean who ranks them or is it just informal?The criteria for levels is rarity only. The levels are managed by some FST members. But I think ZP should have its own ranking system, not copied from somewhere else.
trevorob
April 6th, 2007, 10:53 AM
tracker site rankings
we have a model so lets fine tune it as long as it is not a copy why walk in the shadow of some else this site is different so stay different
wrestledude363
April 8th, 2007, 12:15 PM
So what is the best private torrent site out there?
trevorob
April 8th, 2007, 04:05 PM
So what is the best private torrent site out there?
there are a few depending what content you are after revtt & tl are good best of luck
bblogs
April 17th, 2007, 01:01 AM
The best at the moment:
Bitmetv and OiNK
FANATICOS
April 17th, 2007, 04:48 AM
for me is bitsoup level 10:>
DOOOMKULTUS
April 17th, 2007, 07:58 AM
Im a member of FTN
wrestledude363
April 17th, 2007, 09:32 AM
DOOOMKULTUS...PM me about trading
DOOOMKULTUS
April 17th, 2007, 10:26 AM
guys i dont see any invite in my profile,besides i just registered there.Now there can be only 2 possibilities either im on a different FTN site(unlikely) or u guys havent checked it out.
Xtripit
April 17th, 2007, 09:11 PM
TL is very good. The only reason it's so far down is that it's relatively easy to get an invite.
Oink is by far the best for music. Again relatively easy to get an invite.
dashy111
April 22nd, 2007, 03:14 PM
ScT is apparently the best, but I'll not claim to have access to it. I was talking to a mod/uploader at TL the other day, who also has access to ScT. Basically if you don't have a 10Mbit seedbox, forget ScT anyways, cause trying to keep a good ratio is a b**ch. They have Gigabit seedboxes there that overseed, and so even if you can get an invite (which can only be made by site staff, and hence is extremely rare) you need a seedbox/server connection if you plan on staying there. It's the best in terms of speed and often pre time, but it is also exclusive.
tkbrit
April 22nd, 2007, 04:53 PM
I thought ScT was switching to pay2leech?
dashy111
April 22nd, 2007, 05:03 PM
Not sure. fact is, most people who say they are on ScT are probably lying. And if they are trading invites, they are definitely lying :)
frankie97
April 23rd, 2007, 12:15 AM
revtt is a level 2?? i can get one for free? lol
ok.. well if anyone has a revtt invite they'd like to give me for free.. i'd really appreciate it cause lately it's been a level 50 for me...
thanks
siopilos
April 23rd, 2007, 04:25 AM
What about kazagarga in witch level ???
MediaSlayer
April 23rd, 2007, 11:45 AM
I dont like the rarity ranking. I am all about content, speed and the people. I could find the elusive golden turd but its still a turd
Now that you put it like that, I see your point. The tangible worth that an invite holds, is derived from the quality of the site, the content, and the community. And isn't that the point of ranking the sites to begin with, so you could know what a certain invite is worth for the purpose of trading?
Jorge
April 23rd, 2007, 12:22 PM
Is there a way that i can add ratings to this section of ZP: http://www.zeropaid.com/links/bittorrent
alkillyou10
April 23rd, 2007, 02:15 PM
FTN[5] - ScT[5] and U***[3]
what sites are ftn, sct, and u***
LeetAdama
April 23rd, 2007, 05:36 PM
feedthe.net
scenetorrents
not sure about the other one.
dashy111
April 24th, 2007, 03:36 PM
uk-t
where does supertorrents fit in that list btw?
Xtripit
April 24th, 2007, 04:47 PM
It's there level 2 ST[3.5]
Don't like the staff there. They locked and trashed a question of mine before I could expand on it :( Things like that piss me off :devil2
Like their seeding bonuses though
kubaszek1
April 24th, 2007, 05:24 PM
i think TL is by far the best and FTN but hard to get in
wrestledude363
April 24th, 2007, 08:52 PM
what is the link for FTN?
sunnykill
April 24th, 2007, 09:20 PM
tl rocks
alot of speed and fast
mikechrobot
April 25th, 2007, 02:08 PM
heard there was a new ranking, can someone please post it here?
Xtripit
April 25th, 2007, 02:25 PM
Why? It's only based on rarity not content anyway. It doesn't matter if a site is great regarding content, speed and community. If it's kinda easy to get an invite for it, it's a low level.
optimus_prime
April 26th, 2007, 02:52 AM
heard there was a new ranking, can someone please post it here?
here, list courtesy of buggyme and patriot foreve of fst
This Scale Is To Rate Sites From 1 To 10
1 being the easiest to get into a site and 10 the hardest.
This has nothing to do with contents of the trackers.
Ratings of trackers themselves are in the [#] tags.
NOTE: THIS LIST SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN LITERALLY.
It's just to figure where each site stands (rarity-wise)
Do NOT ask the URL of the sites specified in this thread.
Level 1
These sites are open for sign ups.
Those looking to join can register.
Bitsoup[7] - ILoveTorrents[6] - Midnight Torrents[6] - docs.torrents.ro[7] - DVDseed and countless others...
Level 2
These sites are very easy to obtain.
Chances are you will get one free.
Pisexy[7] - Demonoid[6] - TL[9] - iPLAY[8] - ST[7] - FileZone[6] - FL[6] - Acetorrents[6] - DH[6] - HT[6] - ChronicTracker[6] - TD[6] - SITR[5] - Leechbits[5] - PWT[9] -XboxSky[8] - PussyTorrents[8] - Dimeadozen[8] - cheggit[8] - XWT[7] - Bitspyder[7] - Filemp3[7] - Christian Torrents[7] - Learnbits[7] - HorrorChannel[7] - HDBITS.ro[7] - UKNova[7] - BitHDTV[7] - TVJunkies[6] - Elbitz[6] - TvT.ro[6] - x264[6] - Diwana[5] - Audiozone[5] - The Pokerbay etc.
Level 3
These sites are fairly easy to obtain.
RevTT[8] - Swebits[8] - TTi[7] - WB[7] - SCC[7] - TauriTracker[6] - TB[6] - SoftTorrents[6] - PotUK[6] - A-L[5] - DesiTorrents[8] - TVTorrents[8] - Audionews[7] - BlackCats[7] - MMATracker[7 - TheVault[7 - ProAudioTorrents[7] - FCZ[7] - Childbytes[7] - CO[6]- AOM[6 -KrayTracker[6] - Music-Vids[6] - ExtremeBits[6] - BTMusic[6] - Sweloaders[6] - Goem [6] Brokenstones etc.
Level 4
These sites are harder to obtain for various reasons.
Though fairly easy provided that you offer similar.
RP[7] - TorrentBits[7] - rSR[6] - Snowtigers[6] - TS-Tracker[6] - BitMe[9] - OiNK[9] - KG[7] - ThePlace[7] - HDBits[7] - RMVBusters[7] - IT[7] - VIPMusic[6] etc.
Level 5
Sites from this level on are more difficult to obtain.
Thor'sLand[6]- Danishbits[7] - BitMeTV[10] - TranceRoute[7] etc.
Level 6
FSC[7]
Level 7
FB[8] - NB[8] - TT[8] - PT[8] - CZone[8] etc.
Level 8
FTWR[6] - SweDVDR[8] - E***o[8] etc.
Level 9
ScT[10]
Level 10
Getting these sites is difficult if not impossible.
Consider yourselves lucky if you have these.
FTN[10] and U***[6]
Lecia
April 26th, 2007, 03:44 AM
thanks a lot
jkcchester
May 1st, 2007, 08:54 PM
Hey i know you dont know me im a cool dude,
Im actually a studying preacher trying to find a way to get an invite to christiantorrents.com
seems really hard and i was reading your post i just need some help really bad
help would be greatly appreciated im a killer seeder for sure
locknock1
May 9th, 2007, 03:11 AM
could someone explain why exactly the 'nameless' acronym sites are so coveted? from my experiences on the better open private trackers, almost everything can be found on those sites. what does FTN or ScT have that oink or TL doesn't?
p4paji
May 9th, 2007, 09:42 AM
i have the same q in my mind
wrestledude363
May 9th, 2007, 11:02 PM
Yes...how good is this FTN?
moha2k7
May 13th, 2007, 12:17 PM
great works
but now the sites are rated from 1 to 10
snow_s
May 15th, 2007, 08:26 AM
Where would you rank Torrentleech?!
iddqdidkfa
May 15th, 2007, 11:58 AM
nice works
moha2k7
May 15th, 2007, 12:02 PM
torrentleech is ranked as level 2
the rank is based on rarity
torrentleech is easy to obtain so its level2
some trackers of low level is better than trackers of high level
aresjj
May 17th, 2007, 07:44 AM
If optimus_prime rated the TorrentBits I know, then I don't get the rating.
(I know the levels are based on rarity.)
(I know TorrentBits is also a site that died out.)
Thanks for your answers,
aresjj.
mascott
May 17th, 2007, 08:22 AM
Creating a Zeropaid Rating would be a good thing, and yet the format presented by Optimus_Prime makes a good presentation. There might even be a Forum for Zeropaid members rating many different things or sites used by those members.
I happen to believe that our opinions are just as good as anybody elses, maybe even better.
moha2k7
May 17th, 2007, 10:01 AM
torrentbits is now rated as level one
it was a level 3 tracker
but i has a downtime and now he is building the site again
bollyraja
May 23rd, 2007, 03:03 PM
i got TL, HDbits and OINK invite, i need FTN, can u help ?
capone2323
May 28th, 2007, 12:43 PM
need tl or bitemetv pls...
lobotomia
May 28th, 2007, 04:32 PM
What about filelist.org
bringitawn
May 29th, 2007, 02:07 AM
To the newbie above. I think its taboo to write out the full name and giv ethe url. But you could try the acronym solver (just google it) and usually, you can figure out the name from the list. good luck
holoholo
May 29th, 2007, 02:47 AM
How are private bitTorrent sites currently ranked, (ie which are #1, 2 etc.) and how do you and others each determine their ranking?
Is for a story Im doing here @ ZP. THX
@how do you determine there ranking
Personally i care about following stuff in order of importance:
1. Speeds
2. Design/site look/ theme/ userfriendly to use
3. Releases/pretime
4. Forums
I realize some do not care about 2. But i find it extremely important, why i for ex. dont like TL and love oink, but thats subjective.
Using "how hard it is to get in" as a criteria for rankin is wrong imo. I know a few sites with open signups which are better then some of the here supposed level 6-9 ranked sites. However the reason why some of the high ranked sites are difficult to get in is often idd cause they wanna maintain hard criteria.
Its what you fits best ofcourse.
izac
June 6th, 2007, 04:51 PM
wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oow
capone2323
June 15th, 2007, 08:38 PM
is xbox sky a good site?
renzo2909
June 20th, 2007, 04:04 PM
is good for people with xbox
capone2323
June 22nd, 2007, 05:39 AM
where is the official one?
moha2k7
June 27th, 2007, 10:31 PM
xbox is very good for xbox games
pazsh
July 2nd, 2007, 03:32 AM
xbox is very good for xbox games
i agree with you man!!!!!!
urcurc
July 3rd, 2007, 06:07 PM
Where would you rank PsyBrazil?
Xtripit
July 4th, 2007, 02:36 AM
Since when is Psybrazil at tracker? Psybrazil is a forum
mnc07
July 18th, 2007, 04:54 AM
Hi there
We are brand new to the whole world of torrents. However after doing research and reading what people have to say, looks like its gonna be fun.
From what I have read, the only way to go is to be with a private tracker. Does anyone have an invite for TorrentLeech as a good place to start?
Would be really appreciated.
Matt n Cheryl.
:icon_rr:
rick9
August 7th, 2007, 07:56 AM
Level 1
These sites are open for sign ups.
Those looking to join can register.
RP[7] - Partis[8] - Arenabg[8] - Powerbits[7] - Bitsoup[7] - Midnight Torrents[6] - ILoveTorrents[6] - TS-Tracker - FCZ[7] - docs.torrents.ro[7] - Torrentbits[7] - DVDseed - Softmp3 - TranceBooster and countless others...
Level 2
These sites are very easy to obtain.
Chances are you will get one free.
Demonoid[6] - RTS - TL[9] - FileZone[6] - MazeTorrents[6] - FL[6] - DH[6] - HT[6] - ChronicTracker[6] - TD[6] - SITR[5] - Leechbits[5] - GFT - PWT[9] -XboxSky[8] - PussyTorrents[8] - Dimeadozen[8] - cheggit[8] - XWT[7] - Bitspyder[7] - Filemp3[7] - Christian Torrents[7] - Learnbits[7] - HorrorChannel[7] - HDBITS.ro[8] - UKNova[7] - BitHDTV[7] - TVJunkies[6] - Elbitz[6] - TvT.ro[6] - x264[6] - Diwana[5] - Audiozone[5] - The Pokerbay - Filmbits - btgigs - TakoRauta - Delight4U -etc.
Level 3
These sites are fairly easy to obtain.
LinkoManija[8] - Torrent.LT[7] - Pisexy[7] - Swebits[8] - TTi[7] -Acetorrents[7] - ST[7] - WB[7] - SCC[7] - TauriTracker[6] - TB[6] - SoftTorrents[6] - PotUK[6] - A-L[5] - TVTorrents[8] - Audionews[7] - BlackCats[7] - MMATracker[7 - TheVault[7] - ProAudioTorrents[7] - Childbytes[7] - CO[6]- AOM[6 -KrayTracker[6] - Music-Vids[6] - ExtremeBits[6] - BTMusic[6] - Sweloaders[6] - Goem [6] Brokenstones - VIPMusic[6] - The DVD Club - etc.
Level 4
These sites are harder to obtain for various reasons.
Though fairly easy provided that you offer similar.
SCN - rSR[6] - Snowtigers[6] -BitMe[9] - OiNK[9] - KG[7] - ThePlace[8]- HDBits[10] - RMVBusters[7] - DesiTorrents[8] -IT[7] - TranceRoute[7] - Bitgate etc.
Level 5
Sites from this level on are more difficult to obtain.
FB[8] - Thor'sLand[6] - RevTT[8] - Danishbits[7] - BitMeTV[10] etc.
Level 6
Bithumen - CZone[8] - PT[8] - - iPLAY[8] etc.
Level 7
ScT[10] - nCore etc.
Level 8
FSC[8] - NB[8] - SweDVDR[8] - TT[8] etc.
Level 9
FTN[10] - Exigo[8] etc.
Level 10
Getting these sites is difficult if not impossible.
Consider yourselves lucky if you have these.
FTWR[6] - UK-T[6]
Corruption
August 7th, 2007, 08:48 AM
Hi
Its really bugging me
PT - level 6
FB - level 5
What do they stand for, i pretty much know every other ones, these have got me puzzled.
Appreciate your help
moquilok
August 7th, 2007, 10:43 AM
PT = polishtracker
FB = finbytes
wsxasd
August 7th, 2007, 02:11 PM
Hey guys i have just a question where does suppertorrrents rank in the scheem of thing?
:)
enter8
August 7th, 2007, 02:37 PM
Oink is now a level 4? I guess it's gone up. Interesting.
moquilok
August 7th, 2007, 11:13 PM
Hey guys i have just a question where does suppertorrrents rank in the scheem of thing?
:)
Supertorrents is Level 3 -- designated as ST.
wsxasd
August 19th, 2007, 12:11 AM
whats does SCN - rSR stand for?
jerry36
August 19th, 2007, 03:23 AM
revolutionTT rules ! awesome speed
Parag0n_
August 19th, 2007, 02:53 PM
whats does SCN - rSR stand for?
That's two different trackers. Some, like SCN are missing the content rating.
What's GFT (lvl2)?
Parag0n_
August 19th, 2007, 04:05 PM
Speaking of content ratings. Here's the list organised by those levels (only five for some reason).
Please rate the unrated and discuss the rest. Do the groupings seem reasonable?
RATING 10
BitMeTV, FTN, HDBits, ScT
RATING 9
BitMe, OiNK, PWT, TL
RATING 8
Arenabg, cheggit, CZone, DesiTorrents, Dimeadozen, Exigo, FB, FSC, HDBITS.ro, iPLAY, LinkoManija, NB, Partis, PT, PussyTorrents, RevTT, Swebits, SweDVDR, ThePlace, TT, TVTorrents, XboxSky
RATING 7
Acetorrents, Audionews, BitHDTV, Bitsoup, Bitspyder, BlackCats, Childbytes, Christian Torrents, Danishbits, docs.torrents.ro, FCZ, Filemp3, HorrorChannel, IT, KG, Learnbits, MMATracker, Pisexy, Powerbits, ProAudioTorrents, RMVBusters, RP, SCC, ST, TheVault, Torrent.LT, Torrentbits, TranceRoute, TTi, UKNova, WB, XWT
RATING 6
AOM, BTMusic, ChronicTracker, CO, Demonoid, DH, Elbitz, ExtremeBits, FileZone, FL, FTWR, Goem, HT, ILoveTorrents, KrayTracker, MazeTorrents, Midnight Torrents, Music-Vids, PotUK, rSR, Snowtigers, SoftTorrents, Sweloaders, TauriTracker, TB, TD, Thor'sLand, TVJunkies, TvT.ro, UK-T, VIPMusic, x264
RATING 5
A-L, Audiozone, Diwana, Leechbits, SITR
UNRATED
Bitgate, Bithumen, Brokenstones, btgigs, Delight4U, DVDseed, Filmbits, GFT, Core, RTS, SCN, Softmp3, TakoRauta, The DVD Club, The Pokerbay, TranceBooster, TS-Tracker
ps. it was quite a bit of work to reformat the list so if you find it useful help me out.
GuyFawks
August 23rd, 2007, 04:26 AM
How is HDbits and BitMeTV a level 10.
enter8
August 23rd, 2007, 04:33 AM
Parag0n, that list isn't from another forum, is it? Did you come up with it yourself?
I'm with Guy on this one- HDbits is no where near 10, and BitmeTV, although scarce, isn't a 10 either.
GuyFawks
August 23rd, 2007, 04:43 AM
BitMe, OiNK, PWT, TL - lvl 9 <_< Seriously.
MyDarkSide
August 23rd, 2007, 10:11 AM
Hi,
I'm new here...can you recommend me a site where I can find php scripts, seo scripts, internet marketing software ... a friend of mine get almost everything from thevault ...any invitation to a similar site?
Thank you
Staind2b
August 23rd, 2007, 02:40 PM
Grouping TD with Demonoid is being unfair to TD. The only thing Demonoid has over TD is variety, other than that, TD is better with everything else, such as speed, community, and quality.
Parag0n_
August 23rd, 2007, 03:13 PM
I should have been more explicit, and perhaps not categorized them as levels. In the list posted Aug.7 by Rick9 most of the trackers listed have numbers in brackets following their names. As Optimus_Prime wrote on page one "numbers in squares are tracker ratings, based on content, speed and pretimes" As this number seems more valuable to me than rarity or reputation I thought I would make a list of trackers based on these "content ratings". I should reiterate that these are not MY ratings, I merely reformatted them from the main list so that they can be debated and discussed.
I hope that clears up any misunderstanding.
I've gone ahead and edited the classifications as ratings rather than levels to avoid any confusion with the sacrosanct list in future.
enter8
August 23rd, 2007, 04:01 PM
D'oh!! I get it now. Yes, ratings not levels.
Don't mind us, we can get a little levelcentric. At least, I know I can.
I, personally, would like to see a tracker 'quotient'- an average of 5 rankings- rarity, speed, reliability, quality and size.
inacxch
August 27th, 2007, 11:11 PM
PWT should be at 5
SCC,Danishbits at 9
CZone, Exigo, FB, FSC, NB,SweDVDR,revtt at 10 (very rare trackers to get invites)
GuyFawks
September 1st, 2007, 01:47 AM
Agreed. Pisexy should be a lvl 7. And TopHos should be a lvl 8-9 As signups are extremely rare and only staff can give out invites.
zander20
November 21st, 2007, 06:18 PM
Thanks for the info guys
krazyka85
November 25th, 2007, 10:59 AM
I am a member of RevTT. PM me for more info on my account there and other details on the site.
Steeler1
December 21st, 2007, 01:21 AM
Any chance someone could post an updated list and the levels. I really like having this to use as a reference, but it is just a tad outdated I think. TIA
SeaPlankton
December 21st, 2007, 08:27 AM
Vous avez quelque chose dans vos yeux.
GuyFawks
December 21st, 2007, 08:57 AM
PWT should be at 5
SCC,Danishbits at 9
CZone, Exigo, FB, FSC, NB,SweDVDR,revtt at 10 (very rare trackers to get invites)
Fail. :icon_scra Are you joking! I can give you FB, CZone and Revtt now if i would so choose. They are very common. FTN, I only got (which you didn't list) because I had a friend. Even then bittorent is at the bottom of the filesharing pile. (well not if the tracker has uploaders with scene access)
DREDMOUR
December 22nd, 2007, 10:19 AM
If anyone still have problems with the acronyms of the private trackers posted here, take this tip; hit the follow on the google search: Acronyms Private Trackers....maybe it sounds kinda of silly but works!!!! :icon_thum
stussyking888
December 25th, 2007, 09:56 AM
can anyone send me an invite pls ? thxx
Dizzle4
December 25th, 2007, 10:03 AM
can anyone send me an invite pls ? thxx
This is not the place to ask. Don't beg for invites :icon_pira
stussyking888
December 25th, 2007, 10:03 AM
just read the sticky .. :D
DREDMOUR
December 25th, 2007, 11:52 AM
stussyking888...are you sure about read the right sticky on this thread???
This thread is still related to private tracker site rankings!!!!
( a good advice for everyone - do not beg for invites - read more about the contents of the forums ) merry christmas and a happy new year for all of us!!!!
DREDMOUR
December 27th, 2007, 12:40 PM
well here's ranking maintained by buggyme and patriot foreve of fst, it is accepted widely as fairly accurate representation of supply/demand. some rankings are little off as they obvioulsy haven't included more recent wave of openings into calculation, but that's just couple of half-points around the middle. so...
numbers in squares are tracker ratings, based on content, speed and pretimes. obviously content is somehow subjective, especially around the middle, but you can be sure those with ratings 4-5 are superior trackers.
E***o[4] and U***[5]...????..What means this ones...post at least the complete acronyms of this private trackers....that's makes me too more curious than i usually do!!!^^
vernage
December 27th, 2007, 02:50 PM
T.M.A!!! hahaha
harry303
January 9th, 2008, 12:33 PM
RevoTT[4.5] , TL[4.0] and ArenaBg.com [4.5]
Xtripit
January 9th, 2008, 01:30 PM
Please kill this thread. The only thing it's here for is trading.
There is no need to trade
FANATICOS
January 22nd, 2008, 07:01 AM
:ssssssss//
superdiscount
January 23rd, 2008, 05:30 PM
Please kill this thread. The only thing it's here for is trading.
There is no need to trade
Seconded. Google will lead a lot of desperate people here.
jonnylocks
April 23rd, 2008, 05:51 AM
Hi. I'm new to private torrents and interested in an updated set of rankings.. any leads?
-J
Xtripit
April 23rd, 2008, 07:42 AM
What do you need rankings for? You are not allowed to trade here and that is the only thing those rankings are for. And one little piece of advice, Don't go down that trading road. It will come back to bite you in the ass.
HelenaP
April 23rd, 2008, 09:43 AM
Awwwww... you're so nice!
jonnylocks
April 23rd, 2008, 12:47 PM
Well I'm kinda curious which sites are better than others, or which are less attainable than others, which is what I assume this ranking system is for.
Can you elaborate on the trading route warning? I'm new to the private torrent tracker deal.
Thanks!
-J
jonnylocks
April 23rd, 2008, 12:53 PM
Awwwww... you're so nice!
Am I? or the other fella?
Good to see a history buff here! I study history myself. I recently dl'ed half a harddrive's worth of history docs and textbooks. Torrents kick ass! This is why I am getting into them (also I recently purchased an IPod).
-J
Andrew110
April 23rd, 2008, 12:59 PM
For the love of God will someone please lock this thread?
HelenaP
April 23rd, 2008, 02:18 PM
Why, in God's name? Why???