PDA

View Full Version : Al-Qaeda warns Canada



Jared Moya
October 30th, 2006, 01:05 AM
OTTAWA - An al-Qaeda strategist has warned Canada to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan or face terrorist attacks similar to 9/11, Madrid and the London transit bombings.

The threat, attributed to a member of the al-Qaeda information and strategy committee, condemns Prime Minister Stephen Harper for refusing to pull out of Afghanistan.

It also refers to Canada's "fanatic adherence to Christianity" as well as its purported attempts to "damage the Muslims" and its support for the "Christian Crusade" against al-Qaeda.

"Despite the strong, increasing opposition to spread its forces in the fire of South Afghanistan, it seems that they will not learn the lesson easily," Hossam Abdul Raouf writes.

"They will either be forced to withdraw their forces or face an operation similar to New York, Madrid, London and their sisters, with the help of Allah."

The document, written in July, was obtained and translated by the SITE Institute, a U.S. non-profit group that monitors terrorist Web sites for clients, many of them in government.

It is the second reference in recent weeks to al-Qaeda singling out Canada because of its role in Afghanistan.

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=e9f20f44-ec19-470c-9ac3-6c79218d4d91&k=70612

uselesscrap
October 30th, 2006, 01:02 PM
Oh yeah, well I'm telling my dad, and were warning the al-Qaeda to fuck off or else.

NFSU2FREAK
October 30th, 2006, 02:49 PM
they cant stand the coldness of saskatoon man -45 or lower give me a break tell em to save their nuts and go back to their holes in the ground

napho
October 30th, 2006, 03:45 PM
Those guys don't know who they're messing with!

moneoa
October 30th, 2006, 04:12 PM
We will just set loose the french on them...french canadians weilding stale baguettes

shawners
October 30th, 2006, 05:19 PM
Canada has troops there??? withdraw what?? 3 soldiers?

black_magiic
October 30th, 2006, 05:27 PM
We will just set loose the French on them...french canadians weilding stale baguettes
I
m pretty sure they don't need stale baguettes. They are intimidating enough with that accent and demeanor.

fleecy
October 30th, 2006, 05:30 PM
Canada has troops there??? withdraw what?? 3 soldiers?

not much more left there than that, at the rate they're being killed....

mountain_rage
October 30th, 2006, 05:55 PM
We will just set loose the french on them...french canadians weilding stale baguettes

Hey we french canadians (at least from manitoba) are the ones who invented shooting from cover, before the riel rebellion everyone just marched in straight lines.

Although I cant talk for Quebec, those seperatists are probably behind the plotting of these attacks.

black_magiic
October 30th, 2006, 07:18 PM
Hey we french canadians (at least from manitoba) are the ones who invented shooting from cover, before the riel rebellion everyone just marched in straight lines.

Although I cant talk for Quebec, those seperatists are probably behind the plotting of these attacks.

The whole Louis Riel red river thing was easily one of the most interesting things I have ever looked at in social studies.

cheapprick
October 30th, 2006, 07:31 PM
Canada has troops there??? withdraw what?? 3 soldiers?

If we can take Shawners as the typical American ally we went there to support, let's bring our troops the fuck home.

We've lost too many lately for that.

Jared Moya
October 30th, 2006, 07:31 PM
not much more left there than that, at the rate they're being killed....

At the rate they're being killed? 42 this year so far, whereas 4,000 have died in automobile related accidents. Safer in Afghanistan than on Canadian highways.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/16/world/asia/16afghan.html?ex=1162357200&en=05c3d1313275b5d8&ei=5070
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:CoZ0g_a9ktQJ:archives.cbc.ca/IDD-1-69-1754/life_society/road_safety/+canadian+deaths+automobiles&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3&client=firefox-a


If we can take Shawners as the typical American ally we went there to support, let's bring our troops the fuck home.

We've lost too many lately for that.

Its in support of NATO, its a unified NATO mission under complete NATO command and control.

However, I do think we should all leave that hellhole however and let it digress back into the 12th century that the people there seem so determined to do. If you cant explain to a guy why women should get a frickin education, or that flying a kite for heavens sake is not blasphemous at some point you have to just realize that these people are literally insane and leave them be.

Its like the French, the proverbial heart of intellectualism, have said, that some people havent advanced as society to be able to handle the advanced concepts like free speech, equality, and tolerance. No amount of ammunition can pierce the thick walls of ignorance and indifference.

If we really want to do something far more effective then we oughta quit propping up these stupid countries with billions of petro dollars each year and seek out either alternative fuels or new domestic sources like the Canadian oil sands http://www.cos-trust.com/. Guess we want to use everybody's oil up first and save our own for last.

mountain_rage
October 30th, 2006, 08:35 PM
Its kind of ironic when you think about it, the americain economy depends on oil, but that same oil feeds their enemies. It makes me think of the image of a snake eating its own tail.

cheapprick
October 30th, 2006, 10:28 PM
Its in support of NATO, its a unified NATO mission under complete NATO command and control.


Under the NATO agreement an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. I don't see how that differs from saying Canada [and all of Nato] went there as a result of 9/11.

Canada was one of the handful of countries that took over patrolling the south of the country at the end of July. Most of our fatalities have been since then. To be perfectly clear, it wasn't always noticable we were engaged in a war until then.

While I won't expect more than 3-4 Americans to fellate me for my country's help, I'm not incredibly amused to see our forces mocked by those we went there with to show solidarity.

moneoa
October 30th, 2006, 10:28 PM
Its kind of ironic when you think about it, the americain economy depends on oil, but that same oil feeds their enemies. It makes me think of the image of a snake eating its own tail.
I like that Metaphor, it is very apt

RACKnRAIL
October 31st, 2006, 10:26 AM
Canada has troops there??? withdraw what?? 3 soldiers?

That's what the Americans said in 1812.

mfgbypooter
October 31st, 2006, 11:04 AM
I like that Metaphor, it is very apt

Yah, eating tail, I like it too.

*

Jared Moya
October 31st, 2006, 11:42 AM
Under the NATO agreement an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. I don't see how that differs from saying Canada [and all of Nato] went there as a result of 9/11.

Canada was one of the handful of countries that took over patrolling the south of the country at the end of July. Most of our fatalities have been since then. To be perfectly clear, it wasn't always noticable we were engaged in a war until then.

While I won't expect more than 3-4 Americans to fellate me for my country's help, I'm not incredibly amused to see our forces mocked by those we went there with to show solidarity.

Fellate a Canadian? Our women would never get drunk enough for that...:) But hey, theres always Vegas, as "what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas"......ha ha

As far as the whole NATO notion of an attack on one is an attack on all thing, is pretty much defined by when they all wish to observe it. Turkey's in NATO yet there aren't any Turkish troops in Afghanistan......