PDA

View Full Version : Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century


View Full Version : Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century


Krell
April 4th, 2006, 10:58 PM
With a brilliant idea and equations based on Einstein’s relativity theories, Ronald Mallett from the University of Connecticut has devised an experiment to observe a time traveling neutron in a circulating light beam. While his team still needs funding for the project, Mallett calculates that the possibility of time travel using this method could be verified within a decade.

Black holes, wormholes, and cosmic strings – each of these phenomena has been proposed as a method for time travel, but none seem feasible, for (at least) one major reason. Although theoretically they could distort space-time, they all require an unthinkably gigantic amount of mass.

Mallett, a U Conn Physics Professor for 30 years, considered an alternative to these time travel methods based on Einstein’s famous relativity equation: E=mc2.

“Einstein showed that mass and energy are the same thing,” said Mallett, who published his first research on time travel in 2000 in Physics Letters. “The time machine we’ve designed uses light in the form of circulating lasers to warp or loop time instead of using massive objects.”

To determine if time loops exist, Mallett is designing a desktop-sized device that will test his time-warping theory. By arranging mirrors, Mallett can make a circulating light beam which should warp surrounding space. Because some subatomic particles have extremely short lifetimes, Mallett hopes that he will observe these particles to exist for a longer time than expected when placed in the vicinity of the circulating light beam. A longer lifetime means that the particles must have flowed through a time loop into the future.

“Say you have a cup of coffee and a spoon,” Mallett explained to PhysOrg.com. “The coffee is empty space, and the spoon is the circulating light beam. When you stir the coffee with the spoon, the coffee – or the empty space – gets twisted. Suppose you drop a sugar cube in the coffee. If empty space were twisting, you’d be able to detect it by observing a subatomic particle moving around in the space.”

And according to Einstein, whenever you do something to space, you also affect time. Twisting space causes time to be twisted, meaning you could theoretically walk through time as you walk through space.

“As physicists, our experiments deal with subatomic particles,” said Mallett. “How soon humans will be able to time travel depends largely on the success of these experiments, which will take the better part of a decade. And depending on breakthroughs, technology, and funding, I believe that human time travel could happen this century.”

Step back a minute (sorry, only figuratively). How do we know that time is not merely a human invention, and that manipulating it just doesn’t make sense?

“What is time? That is a very, very difficult question,” said Mallett. “Time is a way of separating events from each other. Even without thinking about time, we can see that things change, seasons change, people change. The fact that the world changes is an intrinsic feature of the physical world, and time is independent of whether or not we have a name for it.

“To physicists, time is what’s measured by clocks. Using this definition, we can manipulate time by changing the rate of clocks, which changes the rate at which events occur. Einstein showed that time is affected by motion, and his theories have been demonstrated experimentally by comparing time on an atomic clock that has traveled around the earth on a jet. It’s slower than a clock on earth.”

Although the jet-flying clock regained its normal pace when it landed, it never caught up with earth clocks – which means that we have a time traveler from the past among us already, even though it thinks it’s in the future.

Some people show concern over time traveling, although Mallett – an advocate of the Parallel Universes theory – assures us that time machines will not present any danger.

“The Grandfather Paradox [where you go back in time and kill your grandfather] is not an issue,” said Mallett. “In a sense, time travel means that you’re traveling both in time and into other universes. If you go back into the past, you’ll go into another universe. As soon as you arrive at the past, you’re making a choice and there’ll be a split. Our universe will not be affected by what you do in your visit to the past.”

In light of this causal “safety,” it’s kind of ironic that what prompted Mallett as a child to investigate time travel was a desire to change the past in hopes of a different future. When he was 10 years old, his father died of a heart attack at age 33. After reading The Time Machine by H.G. Wells, Mallett was determined to find a way to go back and warn his father about the dangers of smoking.

This personal element fueled Mallett’s perseverance to study science, master Einstein’s equations, and build a professional career with many high notes. Since the ‘70s, his research has included quantum gravity, relativistic cosmology and gauge theories, and he plans to publish a popular science/memoir book this November 2006. With help from Bruce Henderson, the New York Times best-selling author, the book will be called Time Traveler: A Physicist’s Quest For The Ultimate Breakthrough.


http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html




.

RACKnRAIL
April 5th, 2006, 07:23 AM
Beam me up Scotty!

I think the first place I would travel is back to 1969 Woodstock. I hate missing a good party and I was just too young for that one.:icon_rr:

Burd
April 5th, 2006, 08:23 AM
So, he's saying that if you go back in time and change something, it won't affect the here and now, because you will be in a parallel universe and only affect that universe and not the one you came from. Well, what's the fun in that? UNLESS, when you "came back," you could be in that alternate universe still at a later time. That woudl be good. Then, you COULD go back and change something by jumping into a parallel existence. Of course, this will need to be regulated. You could really fuck things up badly and then be stuck there. (My head is hurting thinking about this!)

serrebi101
April 5th, 2006, 08:24 AM
I'd go back in time and give myself some prereleased albums. How cool would that be!
lol

Burd
April 5th, 2006, 08:27 AM
And, if you DID jump into a parallel existence, would there then be two of you there? Would there be a void in this universe where you once existed? (I need a bottle of aspirin.)

cheapprick
April 5th, 2006, 10:24 AM
What would prevent the parallel version of you coming to your dimension of existence and fucking up something in your past? Some of my parallels could be real pricks.

mfgbypooter
April 5th, 2006, 11:14 AM
If I could go back in time the first thing I'd do is not post this post.

*

Signa
April 5th, 2006, 12:54 PM
by the sound of the article, time travle may be only possible going forwards. unless they figure out how to reverse the process. i think that if time travle is ever going to be possible we would have had some travlers here already. they have done a damn good job hiding or pretending they are crazy. also one thing that worries me is earth isnt the only existance of space in the universe. and the earth is always moving. wouldnt it make sence that if you jump forward in time but not space that you would land in the same place earth was when you jumped? you could end up floating in outerspace!

Excrement_Cranium
April 5th, 2006, 01:37 PM
I've already done this once before (http://timetraveler.ytmnd.com/).

shawners
April 5th, 2006, 01:58 PM
All they need is a Dalorean, and a flux capacitor.

shawners
April 5th, 2006, 04:09 PM
No body would let time travel succeed. Or anyone use it. Wars would be had over it. think about going into the beginning and destroying a race of people or wipeing out a culture.. Claiming the land before people settle on it. Putting scientific instruments and tools on to a field waiting for discovery, which will shoot up the process of inventing stuff.. Which will launch us further into technology. So the automobile may be made in 1700's.

axlman
April 5th, 2006, 04:24 PM
Maybe the Bermuda Triangle is a time portal. I mean, with everyone and everything that ever went in but never came out!!! Hmmmmm......

black_magiic
April 5th, 2006, 04:27 PM
I think time travel will probably spark the rapid destruction of everything. Time travel is made possible. A week later everything is gone.

mfgbypooter
April 5th, 2006, 04:40 PM
I just got done traveling one hour ahead in time last sunday.

Gonna go back in the fall.

*

Dingo Xavier
April 5th, 2006, 05:07 PM
ok Al step into the machine

I don't think so Tim

black_magiic
April 5th, 2006, 05:26 PM
ok Al step into the machine

I don't think so Tim

LAWL I'm sorry it made me laugh out loud

Ne007
April 5th, 2006, 05:29 PM
If only we had the shit that was supposed to come out this year...that was predicted decades ago.

Nogoodpunk42
April 5th, 2006, 05:33 PM
I've read a lot about time travel and all that stuff and, one of the more popular theories of time travel is you can't go back before the time machine was invented. I don't really know the reason for this but, its something I read. If this isn't the case then a "time machine" will never be invented or used otherwise where are all the time travellers from the future? and if this guy Mallet is right about the parellel universe thing well wtf? someone sometime somewhere must have come here and did something to change things in our universe right? and if someone did change things how would we ever know? Time travel can't ever exist otherwise we'd know. right? I agree with Burd I need some aspirin.

Auggie2k
April 5th, 2006, 05:35 PM
ok Al step into the machine

I don't think so TimHaha I love Home Improvement.

kokanezub
April 5th, 2006, 05:42 PM
id go bk to last week and win the mega million how simple is that

black_magiic
April 5th, 2006, 05:43 PM
I watched on a discovery channel thing about that whole needing a time travel thing to be able to go back in time as to come from the future you need an exit point so in theory as soon as we open up a time machine shit should theoretically start coming back or something like that.

YWD67
April 5th, 2006, 05:44 PM
Come on people say what you realy want to do deep down inside if you were to go and meet yourself in another time.
Many of you would just want to go and make love to yourself.:icon_sunn
I am not taling about a solo one night hander either.:icon_thum

kokanezub
April 5th, 2006, 07:10 PM
i wonder would i fuck my self...would that be gay> i mean its me its like jacking off....

shawners
April 5th, 2006, 07:11 PM
In theory, everything exist. Two shows i loved to watch. Quantum Leap and Sliders. It was intresting in two different view points. Sliding into a parallel dimension where things happened otherwise or it was the slightest change. And the other, jumping within your time line to a different person. Think it was written that if two universes came together, it be an explosion. Negative and positve.

CRLocky
April 5th, 2006, 07:28 PM
I'm highly interested in quantum physics.

Like:

Regarding time, why is it that the past can be remembered, yet nothing can be reciprocally said for the future?

stuff like that.

I'm a fan of What the Bleep Do We Know?!, even though some of the people in it are strange.

Signa
April 6th, 2006, 01:01 AM
i would go back to last tuesday night so i could pay my phone bill on time.

bobhss
April 6th, 2006, 01:15 AM
by the sound of the article, time travle may be only possible going forwards. unless they figure out how to reverse the process. i think that if time travle is ever going to be possible we would have had some travlers here already.

We haven't advanced far enough at this point to time travel, so if it's only possible to go fowards then no one from the past would ever get to our time, only some time in the future would people figure out how to to into their future.

Burd
April 6th, 2006, 08:53 AM
O.K., clearer head now. Look at the evidence: everything is a circle: the earth around the sun, night and day, the seasons. Everything runs in a circle, a cycle. We see only a small part of it, our lives--short or long--however long they may last. But, time is a flowing thing, and it seems only logical to say that it flows in a big circle. So, whatever will happen has already happened and whatever has happened will happen again. So, it doesn't matter if you go forwards or backwards: it's like going to China; go east or west, you'll eventually get there. Wow. Is that Quantum Physics or Philosophy?

Nogoodpunk42
April 6th, 2006, 09:09 AM
Burd that's a pretty good take on the time thing. I think the big draw to time travel though is people want to do it now. Personally, I don't want time travel to ever become possible, imagine a world where at any second you could cease to exist. or one minute your the king the next your the pauper. With time travel too many things could go wrong. Suppose I went back to the begining of man and accidently killed the "missing link" by landing my time machine on him? If I went back to any "parellel universe" where there was man wouldn't that erase man in the universe? Shawners do you have either Sliders or Quantum leap eps.?

multi
April 6th, 2006, 09:28 AM
i like the idea that time is only relevant to the observer and outside of that, all time is instantaneous
if science could truly grasp the nature of probable earths/universes
the reaction would be swift and hostile..many books and theories would be ripped up by the discovery and much would be done to discredit it

i keep wondering if this article isn't an april fools joke ;)

nightshadow
April 6th, 2006, 10:20 AM
There is a big difference between slowing time on an airplane and actually sending something back in time.
Think about it...

cjules13
April 6th, 2006, 11:23 AM
Remember the time travel in this experiment is nothing new, just done a different way. You can already time travel to the future by getting on a fast airplane for awhile. Or by sitting on the top floor of the Sears tower all your life.

This is just using a different method to propel a particle to the future. The particle thinks it's only 3:45, but it's really 4pm.

Already proved by atomic clock experiment.

Time travel to the past is impossible - and this experiment is not attempting that.


Fun to think about though... but time is a one way arrow only... although fast forward button is provided - no stop or rewind.

Dingo Xavier
April 6th, 2006, 12:43 PM
Al, step into the machine...

I don't think so Tim....

Krell
April 6th, 2006, 01:15 PM
Al, step into the machine...

I don't think so Tim....

LAWL I'm sorry it made me laugh out loud




.

CrashPeer44
April 6th, 2006, 01:32 PM
I would go back and try to change the chances I missed out on

multi
April 6th, 2006, 01:40 PM
If only we had the shit that was supposed to come out this year...that was predicted decades ago.

shallowhall
April 6th, 2006, 06:00 PM
The only thing I would change from my past would be going to live with my girlfriend, the wife, and now soon to be exwife, that was a mistake.

shawners
April 6th, 2006, 08:39 PM
You can go faster then speed of light, who says you cant go faster then time itself?

black_magiic
April 6th, 2006, 09:09 PM
LAWL I'm sorry it made me laugh out loud




.


Krell you crafty bastard :)

cixx
April 7th, 2006, 04:18 AM
I my opinion i dont think time travel would be possible, because for one if you go back in time like he said and end up in a parallel universe(not the same universe as the one you left!) then u are not in the past! rather you are in another dimension!. Secondly wen you go back in time he or whoever does it wont be an adult because you would be reversing time everything goes backwards you wont exsist! hence the alternate or rather "Parallel Universe" not time travel. And again i think time is a thing made by the ration of the earth (Doh as in varying time zones and shit not a uniform time setting for everyone) Hence some days when u are in shit time seems to crawl and when u are having fun it seems to fly, time I think or rather the past is not just some written sequence or block of code of thread in a massive wheel of the galaxy but rather relative to the individual! your past happened because you were there...but hey that just my own opinion.

cjules13
April 7th, 2006, 05:51 AM
You can go faster then speed of light, who says you cant go faster then time itself?

That's the thing, you can't go faster than light... At least according to all known physics today. It's fanciful thinking, but this is one "cosmological constant" I don't think we'll ever be allowed to break.

Shortcuts are one thing, actually travelling faster than c is another.

shallowhall
April 7th, 2006, 06:18 PM
I need to go back to new york and no go to the school when I met that woman that I married years later.
I need to go back and tell her that she was ugly to get out of my life

Excrement_Cranium
April 7th, 2006, 09:38 PM
I would shoot forward twenty years so I could see what music I would be calling junk, what kids I would have to chase off my lawn, and what technology would be a total mystery to me. Then, since backwards travel is purely fiction by all the currently known laws of physics, I'd stay there and chase those punk kids with their junk music of my lawn so I could figure out my thingie box.

Lord_of_the_Dense
April 7th, 2006, 10:58 PM
I think I would keep going back in time just before the Sun consumed the Earth. Maybe become a prophet or something.