soulxtc
January 11th, 2006, 08:30 AM
<p>Q: So what does the rewritten law now say? </p><p> <br />The section as amended reads like this: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." </p><p> </p><p>(The law)...covers any types of "communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet"--not just VoIP conversations. Also, it covers any person "who receives the communications" rather than a narrower definition that could have been written as "an individual intentionally targeted as the recipient of the communications." </p><p> </p><p>The law criminalizes certain acts intended to "annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person." Deleting the word "annoy" from that lineup would probably have eliminated the free speech problems. But Congress chose not to do so.</p>
Read the complete article (http://www.zeropaid.com/news/6072/FAQ%3A+The+new+ANNOY+law+explained+%28TROLLING%29/)
Read the complete article (http://www.zeropaid.com/news/6072/FAQ%3A+The+new+ANNOY+law+explained+%28TROLLING%29/)