View Full Version : Be warned, stay away from "unofficial" XP Service Pack 3
View Full Version : Be warned, stay away from "unofficial" XP Service Pack 3
Auggie2k
October 9th, 2005, 10:46 AM
This is not the first time that Windows fanatics create their own "Service Pack" by collecting all available hot fixes in to one installable pack. News has been addressed about these packs over the years but be aware that they are obviously not supported by Microsoft and should not be used in "production environments". The latest Windows XP SP3 pack caught some attention in the online press and now Microsoft have posted a statement in their newsgroups:
NOTE: This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
From: "Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <mikeb...@online.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Windows XP SP3 Preview download
You would be well advised to stay clear of this FAKE SP3 package.
It is NOT suitable for testing as it is NOT SP3.
If is just a collection of hot fixes and other updates we have released. It will not update your Windows XP system to SP3
It also contains a number of private " hot fixes that are usually only issued to users with a specific identifiable problem. The hot fixes are not as rigorously tested at public released ones this is why we ask you to call PSS to get them so we can track you and provide further assistance such as new versions of the fixes etc as they become available. Just installing all the "privates" on your PC may make you machine LESS stable and will also put you out of support from Microsoft or an OEM as you are installing incorrectly issued private hot fixes.
Frankly this "package" should be avoid and you should continue to use
Windows Update and the download site to get the most up-to-date and correctly issued Microsoft fixes and patches.
Anyone who installs this thinking they are getting SP3 (even as a preview)
is being grossly mislead and is posing a significant potentially non
recoverable risk to their PC and data.
Regards,
Mike
Mike Brannon [Microsoft]
Potato
October 9th, 2005, 10:54 AM
Good to know.
notbob
October 9th, 2005, 10:56 AM
i still haven't even done sp1
i applied a few worm patches, that's it
i don't trust the "official" service packs, much less untested cobble jobs
Pathtek24
October 9th, 2005, 10:58 AM
Thats right good old microsoft, wash their hands of anything as quckly as possible..lol...They really crack me up sometimes because i understand why they did this but at the same time it is THEIR hotfixes?!? Oh well, well just see what happens...It wouldn't suprise me if they use SP4 now for their next release instead of SP3 because of this.
ferrarimodena360
October 9th, 2005, 11:07 AM
very very very happy sp2 user
will wait for official sp3 to come
no virus no worm attacks ina long long time
2 thumbs up to sp2
mfgbypooter
October 9th, 2005, 11:09 AM
When I do a fresh install I am going back to SP1.
Windows SP2 "security" sucks.
*
.:sp00ky:.
October 9th, 2005, 11:10 AM
good of old microsoft to warn you that their hotfixs/patches are dangerous lol
Malakai1911
October 9th, 2005, 11:11 AM
If they are talking about RyanVM's pack, disregard this message because it works perfectly fine for hundreds of nLite users, and they turn the OS into swiss cheese and it still works.
http://ryanvm.msfn.org/
Excrement_Cranium
October 9th, 2005, 11:15 AM
When I do a fresh install I am going back to SP1.
Windows SP2 "security" sucks.
*
I can't even do that. OEM copy of XP with integrated SP2.
.:sp00ky:.
October 9th, 2005, 11:24 AM
I can't even do that. OEM copy of XP with integrated SP2.
you could always do a naughty and p2p windows :P
moneoa
October 9th, 2005, 11:27 AM
Why does anyone fall for this shit
RACKnRAIL
October 9th, 2005, 11:34 AM
Why does anyone fall for this shit
lack of experience or IQ
cpugeniusmv
October 9th, 2005, 11:37 AM
I think anyone who uses the internet should be required to pass a test prior to use.
But that's not going to happen.
Auggie2k
October 9th, 2005, 11:39 AM
I think anyone who uses the internet should be required to pass a test prior to use.
But that's not going to happen.
A noob filter - genuis idea!
Good to see you back about here cpu, what you been getting up to?
cpugeniusmv
October 9th, 2005, 11:46 AM
A noob filter - genuis idea!
Good to see you back about here cpu, what you been getting up to?
Just staying busy with classes and homework at college :-)
Not enough time to post regularly anymore.
Auggie2k
October 9th, 2005, 11:49 AM
Ah the college scenario... I left my course because I didn't want it in the first place. It was my last choice so I'm going to apply to a different one.
Like the changes around here? I'm sure you've noticed the vbulletin upgrade. It was a real pain in the ass.
cpugeniusmv
October 9th, 2005, 11:52 AM
Ah the college scenario... I left my course because I didn't want it in the first place. It was my last choice so I'm going to apply to a different one.
Like the changes around here? I'm sure you've noticed the vbulletin upgrade. It was a real pain in the ass.
Looks like the folks at VBulletin have been busy...they finally implemented a sane page number algorithm.
I like the xmlhttp requests for quick replies too.
Auggie2k
October 9th, 2005, 11:57 AM
Looks like the folks at VBulletin have been busy...they finally implemented a sane page number algorithm.
I like the xmlhttp requests for quick replies too.
Yeah that new system is being mighty useful around here, and for me too since they asked me to be a mod.
We even had the usernames next to the reputation comments but grab made a thread and there was a bit of expected friction.
moneoa
October 9th, 2005, 01:11 PM
Yeah that new system is being mighty useful around here, and for me too since they asked me to be a mod.
We even had the usernames next to the reputation comments but grab made a thread and there was a bit of expected friction.
I still find it hillarious to note that even when this supposed feature was on I still could not see who left me what. (yes I know the user name was next to the date, next to the date in my CP though it was and always has been comments. Not one username.)
Oh well :P
Its as funny as the fact I cannot delete my own threads as for some silly reason for the last year I have been unable to delete my first posts in threads I have created.
Potato
October 9th, 2005, 01:13 PM
Isn't that because you have status beyond that of us lowly pissants?
moneoa
October 9th, 2005, 01:49 PM
Isn't that because you have status beyond that of us lowly pissants?
lol...check your rep... :D
Potato
October 9th, 2005, 02:25 PM
ooo you're a funny one monea
ROMANTICGUY50
October 9th, 2005, 02:54 PM
When I do a fresh install I am going back to SP1.
Windows SP2 "security" sucks.
*
Yes SP2 sucks For sure I wont use SP3 Ucky IDEA
FriedSpam
October 9th, 2005, 09:13 PM
i don't trust the "official" service packs, much less untested cobble jobs
I'm going to wait until an official sp3.
-I do rather enjoy Cobble Jobs, though, I must say :icon_rend
Mels_Smileys45
October 9th, 2005, 09:22 PM
I think anyone who uses the internet should be required to pass a test prior to use.
But that's not going to happen.
If the government ever gets their way, it will happen. Youll have to buy a permit with a user code so they will know if you do anything illegal online. These are the golden days people.
Old Man 2045: "why I remeber days when we could look at porn and download all the music we wanted and we loved it!"
Young 10 yr old Lad 2045: "Your fucking lying grandpa! Thats fucking bullshit!"
Mels_Smileys45
October 9th, 2005, 09:26 PM
We even had the usernames next to the reputation comments but grab made a thread and there was a bit of expected friction.
The user names are still displayed in my user cp. Did they go away for some people?
Potato
October 9th, 2005, 09:51 PM
They were never there for monea.
Mels_Smileys45
October 9th, 2005, 09:56 PM
God must really have it out for that boy.