PDA

View Full Version : Triple-Barreled Trojan Attack Builds Botnets



Krell
June 5th, 2005, 12:37 AM
By Ryan Naraine
June 4, 2005

Updated: Anti-virus experts have detected signs of a massive, well-coordinated Trojan attack capable of creating botnets-for-hire. Is it the work of organized crime?

Anti-virus researchers are sounding the alert for a massive, well-coordinated hacker attack using three different Trojans to hijack PCs and create botnets-for-hire.

The three-pronged attack is being described as "unprecedented" because of the way the Trojans communicate with each other to infect a machine, disable anti-virus software and leave a back door open for future malicious use.

"This is so slick, it's scary," said Roger Thompson, director of malicious content research at Computer Associates International Inc. "It clearly points to a very well-organized group either replenishing existing botnets or creating new ones."

According to Thompson, the wave of attacks start with Win32.Glieder.AK, dubbed Glieder, a Trojan that downloads and executes arbitrary files from a long, hardcoded list of URLs.

Glieder's job is to sneak past anti-virus protection before definition signatures could be created and "seed" the infected machine for future use. At least eight variants of Glieder were unleashed on one day, wreaking havoc across the Internet.

On Windows 2000 and Windows XP machines, Glieder.AK attempts to stop and disable the Internet Connection Firewall and the Security Center service, which was introduced with Windows XP Service Pack 2.

The Trojan then quickly attempts to connect to a list of URLs to download Win32.Fantibag.A (Fantibag) to spawn the second wave of attacks.

With Fantibag on the compromised machine, Thompson said the attackers can ensure that anti-virus and other protection software is shut off. Fantibag exploits networking features to block the infected machine from communicating with anti-virus vendors. The Trojan even blocks access to Microsoft's Windows Update, meaning that victims cannot get help.

Once the shields are down, a third Trojan called Win32.Mitglieder.CT, or Mitglieder, puts the hijacked machine under the complete control of the attacker.

Once the three Trojans are installed, the infected computer becomes part of a botnet and can be used in spam runs, distributed denial-of-service attacks or to log keystrokes and steal sensitive personal information.

A botnet is a collection of compromised machines controlled remotely via IRC (Inter Relay Chat) channels.

According to CA's Thompson, the success of the three-pronged attack could signal the end of signature-based virus protection if Trojans immediately disable all means of protection.

"These guys have worked out that they bypass past signature scanners if they tweak their code and then release it quickly. The idea is to hit hard and spread fast, disarm victims and then exploit them," Thompson said in an interview with Ziff Davis Internet News.

He said he thinks the attack, which used virus code from the Bagle family, is the work of a very small group of organized criminals. "There's no doubt in my mind we are dealing with organized crime. The target is to build a botnet or to add to existing ones. Once the botnets reach a certain mass, they are rented out for malicious use."

"There's a black market for infected computers. The bigger your botnet, the more money you can make," Thompson said. He said researchers tracking underground hacker activity had seen a price tag of about 5 cents per infected machine.

Thor Larholm, senior security researcher at PivX Solutions LLC, said there's enough evidence that the sophisticated botnet activity is highly organized by small groups of skilled hackers.

"Over the last year or so, we've seen how easy these guys have created these armies of zombie machines. We believe there are less than 200 people controlling 95 percent of all the botnets out there."

Larholm said the botnet owners have shied away from using major network worms and have instead turned to very small attacks. "We're not seeing the Slammer and Sasser attacks anymore. We're now seeing these virus variants infecting just 20 or 30 machines. The attacks are smaller and the botnets are smaller, and that allows them to stay under the radar," he said.

Both Thompson and Larholm said they see a direct connection between the botnets-for-rent and the adware/spyware scourge. "Botnets are not just for spamming anymore. They are being rented to install spyware," Larholm said.

He said the complicated affiliate schemes that pay commissions based on spyware installs have created a lucrative market for botnet controllers.

Computer Associates' Thompson agreed. "I think that the adware component is becoming clearer, particularly on the bigger botnets. Whenever someone yells at the adware providers, they blame the affiliates. Well, that's the problem. The affiliates are using criminal means to install spyware, and these botnets are a key part of the puzzle."

Andrew Jaquith, security analyst at Yankee Group Research Inc., said the notion of purchasing the use of botnets, or zombie grids, is well-known in the industry. "There's a sharp uptake in the amount of spam being generated by these zombies. It's pretty well-organized," Jaquith said.

"I see this particular malware cocktail as being more evolutionary than revolutionary. The so-called 'blended threat' that it represents is just a combination of existing techniques, updated and tweaked," Jaquith added.

He said he had independent information that zombies are rented out for illegal use and said Computer Associates' assertion of a 5 cents-per-machine market price is quite eye-opening.

"What's interesting about the general trend in malware such as this is that the goal is not to do damage on the victim's system per se, but to enlist it in the attacker's zombie network," Jaquith said.

"It's more useful to the bad guys to leave their targets alive. All Granny's going to notice is that her computer is running slowly while, unbeknownst to her, it's blasting out spam or assisting in a denial-of-service attack."

Even worse, CA's Thompson said, "I think the bad guys are in danger of winning."

"Here we have people who understand how anti-virus works and are smart enough to release multiple approaches to get the 'seeds' through. This wasn't your usual mass-mailer," Thompson said.

Shane Coursen, senior technology consultant at Kaspersky Lab, said CA's theory of a small band of organized criminals is very credible. "We're seeing all kinds of coordination and communication between Trojans, botnets and virus writers."

In an interview, Coursen said there's a massive race among malicious hackers to build and control massive botnets. "It's a very lucrative business, so this is not a surprise at all."

With the rapid proliferation of new types of virus, Trojan and worm attacks, PC users are urged to be strict about following security guidance.

This includes never opening and executing file attachments from unknown sources. Even if the source of the attachment is known, a good rule of thumb is to double check with the sender to make sure it is a legitimate file.

Microsoft Corp. offers detailed information on how to protect against viruses. These include applying security patches in a timely manner and using an Internet firewall. For computers running Windows XP SP2 (Service Pack 2), Microsoft suggests turning on automatic updates and using the Windows Firewall that is enabled by default.

It is also important to subscribe to industry standard anti-virus software and to keep updates current.

Microsoft also offers free clean-up tools, including a malicious software removal tool and an anti-spyware application.

Symantec Corp. also provides a free removal tool for the Bagel virus and its variants.

Story (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1823633,00.asp)

.

ferrarimodena360
June 5th, 2005, 01:14 AM
yest infected by prorat virus (nod32 what the fuck were u doing)
it disabled system restore
removed firewall
nod32 stopped working (dunno wt it was fdoing earlier)

finally removed it manually using well prorat the program

back on norton2003

be advised dont download latest bearshare (version 5) off p2p

Krell
June 5th, 2005, 01:17 AM
yest infected by prorat virus (nod32 what the fuck were u doing)

Its only as good as the extent to which you use it





be advised dont download latest bearshare (version 5) off p2p

Youre kidding right? You mean, we cant trust distributed software? What if we scan each file for virus before we run it?


.

ferrarimodena360
June 5th, 2005, 01:23 AM
Youre kidding right? You mean, we cant trust distributed software? What if we scan each file for virus before we run it?


.

lol

man it came in a zip, and i unpacked it, then its was plain simplle bearshareinstall.exe, i double clicked and then nod32 wokeup, i said delete (checked quartine), but it still infected my comp, nod32 checked it but still let it slip

nod32 is weak (IMHO so no flame wars)

Krell
June 5th, 2005, 01:28 AM
So nod32 saw it, warned you, but failed to completely isolate you and quarentine, is that correct?

.

ferrarimodena360
June 5th, 2005, 01:29 AM
So nod32 saw it, warned you, but failed to completely isolate you and quarentine, is that correct?

.

yep

please dont be rude :icon_boun

Krell
June 5th, 2005, 01:36 AM
meeee?

If nod32 isnt effective, we need to know! I cant say from your experience that it is NOT, but it could be that most antivirus software presently can not fully quarentine this multiphasic attack.

What I want to know is the series of events and how this played out in order to get a better idea of how this could happen. Questions arise such as "was this due to some memory resident feature"? or "Was this virus not fully contained because some part of nod32 was not enabled"? etc etc


.

ferrarimodena360
June 5th, 2005, 01:53 AM
meeee?

If nod32 isnt effective, we need to know! I cant say from your experience that it is NOT, but it could be that most antivirus software presently can not fully quarentine this multiphasic attack.

What I want to know is the series of events and how this played out in order to get a better idea of how this could happen. Questions arise such as "was this due to some memory resident feature"? or "Was this virus not fully contained because some part of nod32 was not enabled"? etc etc


.

kewl here we go
i was using NOD32.2.12.4 (updated definations)
and kerio v2.1.5

i downloaded bearshare v5 of emule
its a zip file
extract file here...

double click on install file

still nuthing happened

after the first welcome screen nod32 popped up
it showed it me its backdoor.prorat

i chose the delete option, checked the qurantine, and exited setup, then i rightclicked the install file and chose for csan with nod32 option, but nuthing happened

opened console of nod32, and chose deep scan. nuthing happened, people familiar with nod32 at this time a new window pops up showing the scan progress but nuthing happened, i went to the option of activity in nod32, and it showed files being scanned and 7 viruses .dll being found.

But i knew things werent allrite coz the scan progress seperate window wasnt opening, i opened task manager under Admin account a "services.exe" was hogging cpu was eating 7megs ram.

i rebooted tried to scan thru nod32, nuthing happened again scan window dint open, kerio dint startup, checked startup (msconfig), couldnt locate anything by name of services.exe

thought i would restore my system , but system restore had been disabled by virus.

umm then went to safe mode, and services.exe was still in the taskmanager, tried opening nod32 in safe mode, it doint open (this is gay NAV does open)

then went to the net read thru this ( http://www.bullguard.com/forum/10/Backdoorprorat_1904.html ), and removed prorat, removed nod32, installed nav2003, and rescanned and it deleted another infected dll

So IMO nod32 failed me

Krell
June 5th, 2005, 02:07 AM
The antivirus services you had running could be specifically targeted by the virus. When you installed the NAV after the reboot, it was a different scanrio, and maybe the NAV was not targeted, or not the same version. This is a lot of speculation at any rate.

It occurs to me, that if a virus disabled my windows envirnment, or critical system files or software, and I HAD TO REBOOT, that I might then just boot up to the Winternals 2005 bootable XP cd, go online, and use the TrendMicro online scanner or the McAfee to scan my whole system.

Do you still have the zipped file?

.

DigitalJunkie
June 5th, 2005, 02:14 AM
Sorry, but you're the weak link. A lot of them, would zipped it to bypass your antivirus protection while downloading. Then, you got to scan every EXE file before you execute it to be sure. I'm also using PrevX Home for intrusion detection protection on my registry & system files, as a prevention protection before they can install anything on my system! Sure protecting your system, is getting harder these days. But, why would you download from a unknown person on the Internet, then run it without taking steps for protection first?

BTW, PrevX Home is a freeware for personal use!

http://www.prevx.com/prevxhome.asp

ferrarimodena360
June 5th, 2005, 02:16 AM
The antivirus services you had running could be specifically targeted by the virus. When you installed the NAV after the reboot, it was a different scanrio, and maybe the NAV was not targeted, or not the same version. This is a lot of speculation at any rate.

It occurs to me, that if a virus disabled my windows envirnment, or critical system files or software, and I HAD TO REBOOT, that I might then just boot up to the Winternals 2005 bootable XP cd, go online, and use the TrendMicro online scanner or the McAfee to scan my whole system.

Do you still have the zipped file?

.

krell. i installed nav only after prorat was removed, just go thru this


Go to this link and download the newwest version ProRat_v1.9 http://prorat.net/downloads.php
after you have downloaded it just extract it and install it will ask you for a password the password is "pro" with no quotes

after installing it just open your prorat and on the right there are several icons
Click on the icon that has a brush over the disk (the second one on the left) and choose from remove prorat server or remove prorat downloader, it will display a message of either"success fully removed" or "You are not infected" and by click on that icon it will take the prorat server or downloader out of your pc

once it is out your Antivirus and your firewall should be back up if they are not then just reboot your PC and enable them
http://www.bullguard.com/forum/10/Backdoorprorat_1904.html
this is how prorat can be removed easily


nav did not in any way help me remove prorat, (only a dangling dll, but at this time i was not infected by virus, as kerio which got disabled earlier started functioning normally, and there was no sign of services.exe)

my complain here is that even after nod32 found there was a virus and even after i chose to delete it, it let it slip. anyways the virus is not a major threat, as u can see how easily it can be removed manually, u can try it on ur system

Check up pm: for eD2k link

Krell
June 5th, 2005, 02:20 AM
I didnt miss your point to begin with

I agree with DJ, I was just being tactful to not say it

I havent seen an antivirus yet that when you click an exe says "Hell no! crackhead" and wont let you.

Anyways, this is all a bit off topic for this thread, and threat

cheers


.

mcovey
June 5th, 2005, 08:00 AM
I think if most cable/DSL internet users (those who are useful in a botnet) would get a friggin NAT Router between them and the web a lot of this would be avoided. Most people couldn't even bother setting up port forwarding, and those who would would hopefully be smart enough (or read a good enough tutorial) to do it right, for something like bittorrent, etc.

and the .exe thing... as krell said a simple virus scanner ought to protect you from that so get one. if you don't you've got nobody but your stupid self to blame when your ISP shuts you down or you get sued or something. That or run a good OS like Linux or OSX. Then your virus worries pretty much disappear, but with Linux, watch those running services and still stick to behind your NAT, it's just, if not more hackable than windows (at least for n00bz like me who can only do linux).

cpugeniusmv
June 5th, 2005, 08:36 AM
I think if most cable/DSL internet users (those who are useful in a botnet) would get a friggin NAT Router between them and the web a lot of this would be avoided. Most people couldn't even bother setting up port forwarding, and those who would would hopefully be smart enough (or read a good enough tutorial) to do it right, for something like bittorrent, etc.
Even from behind a NAT is not nearly 100% safe. There are clever ways around it.

But better than directly online, yes.

ratbag
June 5th, 2005, 08:42 AM
ingenuis..

Unsueable Davey Brown
June 5th, 2005, 10:05 AM
This reminds me of the Sober worm. The one that was big a few weeks ago (and still is apparently), that spammed Nazi propoganda. It did all the stuff mentioned in the article.

With that one if your Windows updates were up to date you were immune, as I recall. Is that the same with these new ones?

cpugeniusmv
June 5th, 2005, 10:14 AM
This reminds me of the Sober worm. The one that was big a few weeks ago, that spammed Nazi propoganda. It did all the stuff mentoned in the article.

With that one if your Windows updates were up to date you were immune, as I recall. Is that the same with these new ones?
I doubt it.

The Glieder trojan was (I've read) spread primarily via e-mail. Once that's been run, I'd say it doesn't matter what level of patching you've done. (Don't open attachments :-) )