PDA

View Full Version : Raid 0 and partitions


View Full Version : Raid 0 and partitions


Pirate_RRRRRR_IIIIII
March 22nd, 2005, 07:46 PM
I recently ordered a new computer with 2 250 gb hard drives, I plan on runnign them in raid 0 but I wanted to know something. I want to make at least 2 partitions, 1 for the os only and another or more for everything else. The question is, will there be any problems in doing this or any impact in the performance of raid 0? Thanks in advanced!

notbob
March 22nd, 2005, 08:05 PM
I recently ordered a new computer with 2 250 gb hard drives, I plan on runnign them in raid 0 but I wanted to know something. I want to make at least 2 partitions, 1 for the os only and another or more for everything else. The question is, will there be any problems in doing this or any impact in the performance of raid 0? Thanks in advanced!


why even bother with raid 0?

you lose 1 drive, you lose all of your data

that's crap

CompuGeek
March 22nd, 2005, 08:07 PM
I recently ordered a new computer with 2 250 gb hard drives, I plan on runnign them in raid 0 but I wanted to know something. I want to make at least 2 partitions, 1 for the os only and another or more for everything else. The question is, will there be any problems in doing this or any impact in the performance of raid 0? Thanks in advanced!

Performance should be the same however you partition it.

Do you realize that when one of your drives dies you'll lose all your data?

:fire

cpugeniusmv
March 22nd, 2005, 09:19 PM
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet, if you lose one drive...you're going to lose all your data. Is that a risk you're willing to take?

Pirate_RRRRRR_IIIIII
March 23rd, 2005, 06:44 AM
Why yes, yes it IS a risk I'm willing to take, I backup data on a regular basis, If I lose one drive I'll just get another one and reinstall everything. Thanks for the replies!

p.s. besides, hard drives last a pretty long time, the 60 gig I have in my 4 year old pc is still in perfect working order, so the huge "risk" I am taking isnt that huge. and like I said, backup often!

notbob
March 23rd, 2005, 09:01 AM
Why yes, yes it IS a risk I'm willing to take, I backup data on a regular basis, If I lose one drive I'll just get another one and reinstall everything. Thanks for the replies!

p.s. besides, hard drives last a pretty long time, the 60 gig I have in my 4 year old pc is still in perfect working order, so the huge "risk" I am taking isnt that huge. and like I said, backup often!


why reload 2 drives when 1 fails when you can reload just 1?

it is just a waste of effort for an extremely marginal (if any) performance boost

CompuGeek
March 26th, 2005, 12:19 AM
why reload 2 drives when 1 fails when you can reload just 1?

it is just a waste of effort for an extremely marginal (if any) performance boost

Ibid.

:hole

NDGAARONDI
March 26th, 2005, 11:12 AM
What about a 500GB HDD?

black_magiic
March 26th, 2005, 11:26 AM
I wish I had a 500GB hard drive

Krell
March 26th, 2005, 11:46 AM
I wouldnt bother with it

I run 2 scsi 10,000 rpm in raid 0, youd be better to use your drive for linear space, or use a different raid

to answer your question, two parts shouldnt be a problem, but theres no performance benefit either.



What about a 500GB HDD?

its even funnier when you lose all your data

.

DwarfBaby
March 26th, 2005, 12:16 PM
I wouldnt bother with it

I run 2 scsi 10,000 rpm in raid 0, youd be better to use your drive for linear space, or use a different raid

to answer your question, two parts shouldnt be a problem, but theres no performance benefit either.





its even funnier when you lose all your data

.

Plus, I don't think the Windows OS can be installed on a Raid 0(If I'm wrong let me know). Therefore the only speed increase would be if you placed your swap file on the RAID drive or you happen run some rare program that requires massive amounts data from your hard drive all at once.

Krell
March 26th, 2005, 12:22 PM
Plus, I don't think the Windows OS can be installed on a Raid 0(If I'm wrong let me know). Therefore the only speed increase would be if you placed your swap file on the RAID drive or you happen run some rare program that requires massive amounts data from your hard drive all at once.

Maybe this can help

http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=830&page=5

read the whole article, then check out the recomended readings at the bottem





.

DwarfBaby
March 26th, 2005, 12:51 PM
Cool, Thanks

NDGAARONDI
March 26th, 2005, 12:55 PM
I wish I had a 500GB hard drive

I have a 300GB one and a 1TB one. :)

NDGAARONDI
March 26th, 2005, 12:57 PM
its even funnier when you lose all your data

There are solutions to situations such as this. The best thing is to copy important data to blank CD or DVD. One way to organise your HD in terms of files are folders that fit a DVD disc etc.