terrorism: serious problem

[TheBlackSnow]

the post has been removed

[Siskabush]

The terrorists have defeated alot of people by inspiring a daily fear in them that these things are going to happen soon.

[Ne007]

The terrorists have defeated alot of people by inspiring a daily fear in them that these things are going to happen soon.

I wonder who tries to make us afraid the most....terrorists...or the government (U.S.)?

[TheBlackSnow]

the post has been removed

[wonderboy2005]

actually my post above, is the narration... about which I will talk in the university tomorrow :))))
how do you think, its good narration?
I hope you're sticking to your native language :)

Otherwise, its not bad, but I'm not particularly fond of the use of scare tactics. Also, it could use some more facts to back up your views.

[TheBlackSnow]

the post has been removed

[Siskabush]

You have a few mistakes in your english.

Terrorism has always been a serious issue, and a serious problem. Today , the word 'terrorism' involves only small bombings and assasinations. but in the future terrorism should look much more dangerous.
today people are frightened, that there is a possibility that terrorists will use a nuclear weapon, but in fact that technology is very difficult to access. people are also afraid that our water supplies can be infected with toxins and/or poisons in the future. the advancement of technology perfectly suits the purposes of terrorism: For example why bother trying to create your own nuclear weapon, when you can blow up a nuclear power station instead? one major factor, that has made terrorism so much more effective, has been the alarming rise in 'sucide terrorism' cases, such as Hamas bombings in Israel. quite big problem is hijacking. and the mostly known case, which revealed, how dangerous hijackings can be... of course in the case of the september 11th terror attacks, when two planes crashed into the two towers, and these planes killed approximatley 3,000 innocent people.
biological war is another frightening prospect, especailly, that biological weapons are cheap to make... and the effects of that weapon are potentially devastating.
chemical weapons is also cheap to make.
so, you see, there are a lot of ways for the terrorists to kill the innocent people.

I probably didnt catch them all though. :)

Good luck with your speech!

[WackoTacko]

You have a few mistakes in your english.

Terrorism has always been a serious issue, and a serious problem. Today , the word 'terrorism' involves only small bombings and assasinations. but in the future terrorism should look much more dangerous.
today people are frightened, that there is a possibility that terrorists will use a nuclear weapon, but in fact that technology is very difficult to access. people are also afraid that our water supplies can be infected with toxins and/or poisons in the future. the advancement of technology perfectly suits the purposes of terrorism: For example why bother trying to create your own nuclear weapon, when you can blow up a nuclear power station instead? one major factor, that has made terrorism so much more effective, has been the alarming rise in 'sucide terrorism' cases, such as Hamas bombings in Israel. quite big problem is hijacking. and the mostly known case, which revealed, how dangerous hijackings can be... of course in the case of the september 11th terror attacks, when two planes crashed into the two towers, and these planes killed approximatley 3,000 innocent people.
biological war is another frightening prospect, especailly, that biological weapons are cheap to make... and the effects of that weapon are potentially devastating.
chemical weapons is also cheap to make.
so, you see, there are a lot of ways for the terrorists to kill the innocent people.

I probably didnt catch them all though. :)

Good luck with your speech!

that biological weapons are cheap to make... and the effects of these weapons are...
chemical weapons are also cheap to make

i think thats all :)

[TheBlackSnow]

the post has been removed

[IshareManyFilez]

The US government is a big part in being scared but you also have to look at the conservative media stations. They pump out more phony terrorism threats than reality shows and boy do they make a lot of reality television.

[Ne007]

Man...good thing you posted that...not one sentence was free of gramatical errors :O

[Muffin_Man]

Terrorism isn't really as big a problem as people seem to believe it is. Even in 2001, the total number of people killed worldwide as a result of terrorism was between six and seven thousand, and average yearly numbers are considerably less.

Comparatively, about 16-17 thousand people are murdered yearly in the United States alone, and over forty thousand are killed in car accidents. Worldwide, about 10 million die as a result of smoking. And in Iraq, anywhere from 10 to 100 thousand people have died as a result of US military action, depending on who you ask.

[Undying Wizard NHD]

who cares, if you worry about this crap everyday then you may as well stop living life, there is always goin to be somone to fuck shit up but why worry about it ? live life get paid, get laid



if you die in a plain crash oh well atleast you got on the damn thing, my heart goes out to the 9/11 people that died but we cant act affraid thts what those diepper heads want us to do.



just forget it happend forget about those basterds forget about the war,, I did and I dont make these threads-- who cares not I-- I know alot of people care about tis crap I say SO FUCKIN WHAT


if I die I die

[ssj4conejo]

LOL. dont forget to mention the Terrorism that is caused by Israel soldiers in Palestine. Such as shooting young girls several times, and demolishing homes within 15 minutes when you are the terrorists family, even if the person who blew himself up ran away from home. And dont forget the Naval ship USS that Israel sank which killed 34 u.s soldiers. = ). Yes hamas are terrorist too, but in the end, you will see that more palestinians have been killed than israelis.

and the biggest of all terror attacks by mossad, on September 11th.

I wonder how the college would react if u would say what i stated above. I bet thei'd kick you out for being "anti-semitic" lol. makes me laugh how these ppl always use the same excuse. Its getting old to cry wolf.

[Whistler]

Modestat isnt in America and only there would that get anti-sematic remarks... or perhaps in Isreal.
@UndyingWizard: Be careful about refering to terrorists as "diepper heads" that is, refering to islam, as they are not responsible in any shape or form for the september 11th attacks.

[Mels_Smileys45]

You get a 10 out of 10 on the bum out scale.

[Undying Wizard NHD]

Modestat isnt in America and only there would that get anti-sematic remarks... or perhaps in Isreal.
@UndyingWizard: Be careful about refering to terrorists as "diepper heads" that is, refering to islam, as they are not responsible in any shape or form for the september 11th attacks.



I dont like those people either, becarful about what ? are they goin to come to my home and rape my pig ? well maybe they will I dont know

[YWD67]

I wonder who tries to make us afraid the most....terrorists...or the government (U.S.)?

By keeping you in fear the government can control you better. Ask the Germans who were around when Hitler was running the show.

[Undying Wizard NHD]

I fear none of those basterds if I had the chance I would slap bush, bin laden ,and sadam

Id slap bush first , but would nuke the other 2 before tht

[Lord_of_the_Dense]

I dont like those people either, becarful about what ? are they goin to come to my home and rape my pig ? well maybe they will I dont know

What Whistler is trying to say is you need to tone down your terminology of the race of people you speak of. No one is denying you your opinion. Just be wary of how you classify people that you don't care for or agree with. Your statement is borderline racist and could be a violation of forum rules.

[Siskabush]

I fear none of those basterds if I had the chance I would slap bush, bin laden ,and sadam

No need to worry about Saddam. He is in prison, probably getting it up the ass lol.

[mikedoug]

I'm sorry to be so picky, but one little factual thing bugs me:

"why bother trying to create your own nuclear weapon, for example, when you can blow up a nuclear power station instead?"

Nuclear power stations do not turn into nuclear bombs when you blow them up. Doing this would most likely just shut the station down since the material is not correct for bombs, etc...

Keep this sentence if you just want to make an impact, but you should be aware it's unrealistic.

[ratbag]

ever hear of Chernobyl who needs to make a nuclear weapon when they are just waiting to be hit

[wonderboy2005]

I'm sorry to be so picky, but one little factual thing bugs me:

"why bother trying to create your own nuclear weapon, for example, when you can blow up a nuclear power station instead?"

Nuclear power stations do not turn into nuclear bombs when you blow them up. Doing this would most likely just shut the station down since the material is not correct for bombs, etc...

Keep this sentence if you just want to make an impact, but you should be aware it's unrealistic.
Just because something doesn't make a big boom doesn't mean its not dangerous. Ever heard of Cherenobyl (yeah, I butchered the name... sue me)? The explosion itself didn't kill all that many people - the radiation did. The area won't be 'livable' for almost another 1000 years.

[WE_DELIVER]

I lived pretty close to that city back in Ukraine(check out Kiev).
Nuclear reactors are hard to use to make a successful attack since the fuel needs to be spread out over a large area, and it is encased inside a super thick(and if its on, very hot) steel reactor housing, which is inturn encased in a shitload of concrete, which inturn is probably guarded very heavily by now....so its highly unlikely.
The reason Chernobyl was so "successful" in killing people is that an explosion happened INSIDE the reactor housing when hot fuel touched water. There was a steam explosion so powerful that it forced, with steam, a 2000 ton reactor lid into the air. This steam mixed with fuel(uranium/plutonium/whatever) excaped into the outside. Strong winds then helped spread the a lot of the radiation all over eastern europe and more.
So somebody would have to get a crapload of explosives into the reactor housing and still be alive to blow them up. If anything is more possible, it would be to "operate" the reactor into catastrophic failure....but that is highly unlikely......

just my 2cents..

[Undying Wizard NHD]

What Whistler is trying to say is you need to tone down your terminology of the race of people you speak of. No one is denying you your opinion. Just be wary of how you classify people that you don't care for or agree with. Your statement is borderline racist and could be a violation of forum rules.



ohh ops sorry , wasent thinkin about that