View Full Version : Go to the filesharing section and vote
PuNiShErKiLl666
May 7th, 2004, 08:19 AM
I just added a shit load of programs to the Program section and I will keep adding it. We are looking bad on there right now because you people arent voting!!
Connect is #1 and I believe Foldershare is #2. Some good programs are way in the back. Go and support your favorite program! and if I'm missing your favorite tell me.
I also added alot of tools and me and Jorge decided we would expand our library to pretty much anything now. So I have some work to catch up on.
So just telling you if you thought the program section was dead. Check her out now! and if you find any problems tell me!
Malicious Intent
May 7th, 2004, 08:52 AM
To help a few people out, copy and paste the below:
"This program is awful! I couldn't find any files I want! Use Shareaza! I get speeds of 5000Kb/s!"
Malicious Intent
May 7th, 2004, 08:53 AM
On a less cynical note, well done Yoda. You are putting in a crap load of work, and it shows :gj
smokingbevel
May 7th, 2004, 10:10 AM
WARNING: Obvious whitespace imbalance demands attention.
http://www.zeropaid.com/php/filesharing.php
ferrarimodena360
May 7th, 2004, 10:21 AM
put cdex as a ripper
Miniver
May 7th, 2004, 10:23 AM
Where do we vote?
g-smooth2k
May 7th, 2004, 11:34 AM
Where do we vote?
Yeah miniver I wanna know where to.
ferrarimodena360
May 7th, 2004, 12:02 PM
cick on read more about an application , then u willl see an option to rate
Induna
May 7th, 2004, 01:50 PM
put cdex as a ripper
And put DVD Decrypter in the DVD tool section. It's a useful free app.
http://www.dvddecrypter.com/
PuNiShErKiLl666
May 7th, 2004, 02:30 PM
WARNING: Obvious whitespace imbalance demands attention.
http://www.zeropaid.com/php/filesharing.php
I swear i don't see that. Could you possibly take a screenshot?
also to others I will add and edit your programs right away. Thanks.
Also I noticed some HTML code errors in some program's pages. Im trying to filter out which ones they are so i can see what the hell is wrong. So please bare with me.
If you find any please give me the link :)
Thanks
smokingbevel
May 8th, 2004, 10:54 AM
...as displayed by Internet Explorer 6 (Red "whitespace" text added for effect.)
Malicious Intent
May 8th, 2004, 11:00 AM
Looks alright on mine. I'm guessing Yoda has a higher screen resolution.
PuNiShErKiLl666
May 9th, 2004, 10:20 AM
Well here is the thing. I saw that on my school's computer now that I think about it. That is not my area to fix. I have no access to fix that. Thats a Jorge thing. I will let him know though.
smokingbevel
May 9th, 2004, 05:20 PM
The reoccurence of threads pertaining to, but not limited to, analysis of the pros/cons of services, which particular services are ideal in locating specific content, which services are better suited to certain connection or bandwidth circumstances, and which services are effective similar alternates to already known services, is a situation potentially propagated by a failure in the ZeroPaid Filesharing Programs Section to inform or provide answers to the user effectively. Evidently, there may be flaws in the structuring and organization of information which limit user accessibility.
Perhaps networks/categories should be displayed alphabetically in a branch layout with access programs as nodes.
The interface for the commenting system for each service should be consistent and emphasize easy access to encourage user feedback.
Currently, the main descriptor for each service is composed mostly of the hype designed to sell the user on the service. Presently, to examine "real", accurate opinions and examinations of a service by another user, a user must first sift through several pages, where each page contains only a measley 5 comments. The user might be better served by consolidation of comments, with separation into negative, positive, other components and an inclusion of a greater number per page.
Each service might also contain, in addition to the hyped descriptor, a true, relatively unbiased summary of the pros and cons of the service, and details concerning, but not limited to, specific content availability and reliability, initial share requirements (xGB), typical connection/bandwidth suitability, user accessibility, user interface friendliness, and anonymity/privacy implementations. Such tasks aimed at optimally informing the user should not be considered by any means easy or insignificant as they require combined input from many sources with special expertise acquired under various circumstances.
PuNiShErKiLl666
May 10th, 2004, 05:37 AM
ya know smokingbevel your right and I thank you for those suggestions. I will talk to Jorge about the coding of this (I cant do that cause I have no access) but I will work on that pros and cons idea which will really be cool.
Its gonna take time though.