PDA

View Full Version : Responce From HOward Coble to H.R. 5211



Aaron73153
August 11th, 2002, 05:46 PM
Dear Mr. Kaufman-Moore:

I am writing in response to your comments regarding H.R. 5211, a bill to limit the liability of copyright owners for protecting their works on peer-to-peer networks. I appreciate the opportunity to address your concerns.

I cosponsored H.R. 5211 because I support efforts to reduce the rampant piracy of copyrighted works on peer-to-peer networks. Piracy is hurting songwriters, authors, graphic artists, photographers, and software developers in North Carolina and across the country. Contrary to media reports, H.R. 5211 does not allow copyright owners to “hack” into the computers of private network users. H.R. 5211 is intended to clarify that copyright owners may utilize new technologies to protect their property as it is distributed on peer-to-peer networks. In other words, copyright owners could use decoys, spoofs, redirection, or file-blocking to protect their works from piracy. The legislation is narrowly crafted and provides network users with legal recourse against a copyright owner that acts beyond the scope of what is permitted by the legislation.

While H.R. 5211 in its current form may not be the perfect answer to a serious problem, it will stimulate dialogue on finding effective ways to curb piracy. That is why my Subcommittee will conduct a hearing on the issue of piracy on peer-to-peer networks in September. This does not mean that H.R. 5211 will be voted on prior to adjournment this fall. It does mean that my Subcommittee is interested in exploring ways to combat digital theft of copyrighted works, including music and movies.

Thank you again for your comments. If you have futther questions about this matter please contact Debbie Rose of my Subcommittee at (202)225-5741.

Smcerely,

(he actually signed it here, not autopen)

HOWARD COBLE
Chairman
Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and
Intellectual Property

cheapprick
August 11th, 2002, 06:58 PM
"Piracy is hurting songwriters, authors, graphic artists, photographers"

Yeah, these are the people whom he is worried about. After all, everyone knows that these people get the lion's share of the profits from the making of most copyrighted products, right?

Do you believe him when he says that people aren't being given the right to hack into your system?
Read it : http://www.house.gov/berman/p2p.pdf

Hacking is certainly not ruled out, it was written broadly in Government style. So far reaching that you can't even see how dangerous it is until it's too late.

Aaron73153
August 12th, 2002, 09:15 AM
No I don't believe it one bit. I wouldn't put actual hacking past the same people tha used their highest awards show to unfairly attack peer-to-peer. If they did hack into your machine and you lost everything, sure you could sue for a new hard drive and maybe some punative damages, but the value of the information lost can't be calculated. There is the potential that a college profesor could have his home machine hacked and lose some potentially breakthrough research.

P.S. Canadians are cool, but the HURRICANES RULE!

cheapprick
August 12th, 2002, 04:22 PM
Hurricanes?

They sound familiar. Is that the Leaf's farm team? Heh Heh.