CSSDUDE'S Girlie Pics

[Sephiroth]

CSSDUDE has stated numerous times that he thinks that since the majority of people here arent complaining that everything thinks that it is ok to post pictures of jailbait-age young girls here.

So this poll is created to come up with the definative answer if you think that its ok for him to post girlie pics of young and little girls then vote yes. If not then no.

[MoonMan]

So basically what you are doing is creating a thread to flame him ?

[phalkon30]

Seph, I really disagree with this thread, and am surprised that a Mod would stoop this low to flame somebody.

CCS has in the past put some questionable content in his avatar or sig, but upon complaint has pretty much taken down the questionable content, or changed to something else. There is no need to publicly adress this, as you will only get flame responses, make CCS look bad, and will most likely ignore the poll results anyway. I'm really stunned that you felt the need to do this.

[Sephiroth]

Originally posted by MoonMan
So basically what you are doing is creating a thread to flame him ?

No not at all. Its a valid question since he has stated numerous times that he believes that the majority of people doesnt have a problem with them and this is just created to test his theory.

[cheapprick]

I don't think so, the poll has recieved 10 votes with mine being only the third comment. I think it's closer to looking for the definitive answer Seph mentioned. We wouldn't want to tell him to stop it point blank, only to find that the rest of the members really didn't care.

Personally, I don't like the pics or words so I voted No.


edit To be clear, wholesale flaming is not allowed by forum rules so if people use this poll as a way to bash CSS, their posts will be removed and their membership may be as well.

[MoonMan]

Of course a moderator would never edit the results to his liking.. no never.

[horsemen]

i VOTE NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. I do'nt like slamming people.Even if he's got it coming.I'll leave that for someone else.

[Sephiroth]

Originally posted by MoonMan
Of course a moderator would never edit the results to his liking.. no never.

Pretty quick to accuse that and the flaming...

Then again im not surprized that you or what i like to collectively refer to as the "Chat Mob" would stoop to accusations and probably soon name calling because once again you couldn't force things your way.

[overdo]

i personally don't find them offensive, doesn't mean i agree with him but i don't really think its a huge issue. the internet is about freedom of speech after all.....

[ddandelion]

i think this thread is innapropriate for a moderator or anyone to make. If the mods have a problem with this they should discuss it with cssdude personally and not make this some kind of popularity contest.

[Sephiroth]

Originally posted by ddandelion
i think this thread is innapropriate for a moderator or anyone to make. If the mods have a problem with this they should discuss it with cssdude personally and not make this some kind of popularity contest.

that has been tried numerous times and again according to him the majority of people think that its ok.

Hence this poll to test that arguement. Again this is NOT A FLAME THREAD!!!

So if anyone who wants to continue to try to flame in this thread and get it off topic or get try to start crap with me their posts are getting kicked out.

[MoonMan]

Originally posted by Sephiroth
that has been tried numerous times and again according to him the majority of people think that its ok.

Hence this poll to test that arguement. Again this is NOT A FLAME THREAD!!!

So if anyone who wants to continue to try to flame in this thread and get it off topic or get try to start crap with me their posts are getting kicked out.

That is such crap. I didn't flame once. Maybe if you actually read them.

[Sephiroth]

Originally posted by MoonMan
That is such crap. I didn't flame once. Maybe if you actually read them.

Yeah you did and anyways this isnt the threads for it and so if you want to take shots at me or talk about this further then you can either do it in PM or somewheres else.

[Greylin]

I could care less what pictures people post here. I understand there are some basic guidelines governing what can and can't be posted. To me it does seem like an excuse to call out a specific member of the forums. Why else would you include the users' nickname in any of the posts to begin with other than to stir the pot. Now if the poll had simply been a yes/no/I don't care about "whatever subject" then i believe there would have been no problems. Why not try to solve things through PM's after doing a real poll.

[phalkon30]

Seph, ignoring whatever motives you had for this thread, I'll give you my oppinion.

CCS did have some very questionable pictures, a few that I didn't think should be up, but that was MONTHS AGO. Seriously, you're digging up the past here, I haven't seen anything remotely offensive from him lately. Ok, maybe a few comments, but if you're going to go after every single little thing said, you're going to have to single out more than just CCS.

Right now? I don't find CCS offensive at all.

[ddandelion]

seph, why do you care if cssdude thinks people are ok with his pics? You are a moderator and you people make those decisions. This isn't a democracy.

[MoonMan]

If you call my posts flames, then you are pretty confused as to what constitutes as a "flame".

I left my opinion on this whole thing just like everyone else and I am being singled out for "flaming". Only you would ever do something so ignorant.

[Krell]

Originally posted by ddandelion
i think this thread is innapropriate for a moderator or anyone to make. If the mods have a problem with this they should discuss it with cssdude personally and not make this some kind of popularity contest.

Far be it for me to take slack here, but, this HAS been discussed personally over and over and over . . and ccsdude doesnt have a problem with popularity contests, I remember one quite clearly.

Today he made the statement, that he wasnt removing any pics just because someone (myself) thinks they are offensive. In other words, screw what everyone else thinks, such as Potato or janet or vipp, were not the boss of him now.

[MoonMan]

I deleted my last post after I saw your edit. Doesn't mean the damage isn't done, but in the interest of keeping this thread as civil as it will ever be I will stop posting in it.

Sad day when views which are well in bounds with the rules and regulations are deleted because they are not shared by the moderators.

[Stellar]

ok, i am too new here to get caught up in the politics, in fact i considered skipping this one over entirely but i feel too strongly.

i dont agree with there being a thread about this because it should be beyond that. child porn, no matter how "soft", is absolutley unacceptable. keep that shit out of public places. period. no warnings.

[chipperrox]

Thats RIGHT! keep it OUT of public places! send it all TO ME!

..whoa
just kiddin

[BlueLieu]

Since I turned off Avatars and inline IMG's I don't know and don't care what CCS posts (as far as pics). Something as universally offensive as a few of the pics he posted warrents discussion but if this was truely resolved already, wassup??

Anyway....I dunno why I posted. I was bored.

[Rickio]

I am fairly certain CCSDUDE gets a kick out of the attention and simply loves to poke people once in awhile.

He is a cool guy in general but he is stubborn and needs to cool it with the right to the edge of decency shit. He is just playing and getting a laugh out of anyone he manages to bug.
Oh and it does bug me a lot sometimes.

But anything that hints of child porn should be banned.

peace

[TipYourBartender]

Personally, I think that this thread should not have been made, and that sentiment will bear itself out very soon. Something about this whole thing stinks. And furthermore, the poll question is negatively biased.

Does that mean I could be wrong? Sure. In fact, I hope so.

For the record, the "softcore pics of jailbait" don't bother me, mostly because I don't pay any attention to them.

[shawners]

would i get in trouble if i did the poll vote? even though i didnt see anything offensive, if you got the url, copy or link it to me, so i can determined whats offensive, heaven forbid you should actually find things like that on a p2p community network like kazaa. =)

[Feather]

get rid of the child pron already. that is just sick

[Serps]

There is no place for those sort of pictures on any sites, regardless who has posted them.

[Feather]

^
l
l
Agrees with

[CCSDUDE]

Er...so how about GOING to www.facesoffilesharing.com and SEEING what the images are.

Seph has been known to bend truths to get his own way.....

[Psilaxs]

Originally posted by Sephiroth
Yeah you did and anyways this isnt the threads for it and so if you want to take shots at me or talk about this further then you can either do it in PM or somewheres else.

PM, yes, exaclty:devil

[Feather]

been there and seen the crap

[notbob]

why don't you both leave, make your own sites, and stink them up instead?

ccs can post his stupid pictures and be a cussing moron, and seph can make his non porn, non political, bearshare haven

then we won't have to see any more of this bullshit

[Rickio]

Originally posted by notbob
why don't you both leave, make your own sites, and stink them up instead?

ccs can post his stupid pictures and be a cussing moron, and seph can make his non porn, non political, bearshare haven

then we won't have to see any more of this bullshit

wowie now their is a classic notbob statement! lol


peace

[CCSDUDE]

Originally posted by notbob
why don't you both leave, make your own sites, and stink them up instead?

ccs can post his stupid pictures and be a cussing moron, and seph can make his non porn, non political, bearshare haven

then we won't have to see any more of this bullshit

Classic....bit me u fuk u! : )

In my defense I didn't start this BS other then my involvement with saying I wouldn't REMOVE my images on facesoffilesharing. I moved them as to aid Krell in his 'fight' to keep guys/girls sections clean of random 'skank' images. Other then that Seph went on a lame ass crusade to prove people dislike me and what I post.

But whatever it's all good considering things are neck an neck.

Ah and I do know how to check for 'aided' polls...so don't bother trying to add votes in your favor...

[FreakinWeasel]

From what I have seen we have some people over the age of 18 (jailbait = jail time) and some people under the age of 18 (jailbait= good time). So I have to wonder what the age ranges of those that DON'T have an issue with them. I personally have kids old enough to be in those pictures, so I'm not to keen on them, and if you thought of taking their picture:shoot(keep in mind my past comments about .50 cal weapons for a clue) ... but if your young enough, who am I to tell you not to look.

And for the record I can't seem to pull up the www.faces....website. It appears that we crashed it looking at CCS's picts or something else is awry. So again I have not viewed shite. I am speaking in general terms not just about one person!

[wingnut2600]

I am sure that this will be construed as "backseat moderation," but I think that this thread is a flame:

Originally posted by Sephiroth Hence this poll to test that arguement [sic]. Again this is NOT A FLAME THREAD!!!

Then again im not surprized [sic] that you or what i like to collectively refer to as the "Chat Mob" would stoop to accusations and probably soon name calling because once again you couldn't force things your way.

You say that this is not a flame, but the title of your poll is "Is it ok to have softcore pictures of jailbait?" This has quite a bit of voice in it and is most assuredly an attack/flame since it has a negative connotation that you have decidedly perpetuated through the phrasing of the title.

Again, you refer to people that use the chat as a "mob," which is also intended as a slam. Who are these people in the chat mob? I am there maybe once a week for an hour... am I part of this mob? I have my own voice and do not require attending the council of elders (which is plotting your downfall I am sure as we speak). There is a link to it on the front page... you are invited to come anytime that you like. I miss having conversations with you; it reminds me that you are a human being. You should really stop slamming the chat, it is a nice place for ZP users to come together.

Oh, by the way... I think that the manner in which "CCS" (for Card Captor Sakura, please get it right people) puts out the pictures is the offensive part, not the pictures in and of themselves. It is just a joke that he thinks is funny and no one else does. Should he be stopped? As long as he is not breaking the rules I am cool with it... I voice my disapproval and it is marked in the record.

:fire
(the frog is into all sorts of twisted sick shit)

[MxRob]

Originally posted by BlueLieu
Since I turned off Avatars and inline IMG's I don't know and don't care what CCS posts (as far as pics).
I think that as long as they are not directly sexual or show action etc, they are not offensive nor should be considered child porn.
If anyone can't deal with it just turn off the avatars and IMG's like Blueliue said. It's like putting parental controls on the internet so Johnny cant look at porn sites.
Solution solved nobody gets hurt:tilted

[Sephiroth]

Originally posted by CCSDUDE
Other then that Seph went on a lame ass crusade to prove people dislike me and what I post.


No to prove your lame and incorrect assumption that since no one complains directly to you that everyone thinks that everything you posted its ok.

Also if you finally understand that which ive tried numerous times to get it into your skull then i will remove this thread.

The poll was not modified and the results are true. Dont blame me if you dont like the results.

[Ardor]

Look Sephiroth, what you are basically having is called a *Witchhunt*, it is offensive to a member of your forum, it is pathetic, and you should get a life.
If CCS's stuff was really that bad, the owners (obviously not you) of this forum would have banned him long ago, and that would have been that. Instead you are trying to get some kind off public support for your narrow-minded opinion.
And while I know that CCS had some stuff which was *on the edge* before, it is clear that he toned it down a notch.
So stfu, and once again, get a life. Oh, and it shocks me that a moderator created this lame poll...:fire

[wapazoid]

What exactly is the extent of CCSDUDE's "inapropriate" images? Is his current avatar and signature image the worst of it? If he has truly posted images of children in any way associated with the definition of pornography (partial/full nudity and engaged in any sexual act), then law enforcement NEEDS to be involved here. If his current signature image (the youngster from the Harry Potter series) insuniates pornography in your eyes...then you may have a personal problem. Don't get me wrong...I do find it a bit odd (if CCS is an adult male without children of his own), but I wouldn't go so far as to call it outright offensive. Just my opinion.

[Malakai1911]

I do believe the server is down. And ping reply gets nothing. Anyone have any idea as to whats going on?

So, its hard to judge CCSDUDE based on accusations with no evidence.

Are the pics in question considered "legal" in a strict word-of-the-law sense? (And I don't mean an interpretation).

[method77]

the site is down for repair

[Lucian]

If they arent naked, theres no problem with it.

Nude pics however are a totally different story,

[CCSDUDE]

Originally posted by wapazoid
What exactly is the extent of CCSDUDE's "inapropriate" images? Is his current avatar and signature image the worst of it? If he has truly posted images of children in any way associated with the definition of pornography (partial/full nudity and engaged in any sexual act), then law enforcement NEEDS to be involved here. If his current signature image (the youngster from the Harry Potter series) insuniates pornography...then you may have a personal problem. Don't get me wrong...I do find it a bit odd (if CCS is an adult male without children of his own), but I wouldn't go so far as to call it outright offensive. Just my opinion.

Nope when FOFS comes back up you can check 'em out for yourself. Basically Asian chicks in their 20's one of Shiri of Roswell looking cute and one of some 'chick' of which I have no clue as to name in a bikini next to a tree.

I've never posted anything that was even close to being sexual. The worst you could accuse me of is having a sick taste in humor. Something along the lines of a signature with "I swear I didn't know she was 9!". Or my current signature text compliments of TipYourBardtender....Madlibs is one FUNNY ass game...lol

Seph I don't want you to remove this thread. Leave it for ALL to see. It's a good thread in one sense... :wings

Ah and to whoever asked about age...I'm 19 : P

[The Hunter]

Jorge has stated that the site is down for repair, and that he will be posting rules, and also removing any pictures that he deems improper. That is how it should be, as it is his, and Dubs site after all.

[crackerjacker]

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by wapazoid
What exactly is the extent of CCSDUDE's "inapropriate" images? Is his current avatar and signature image the worst of it? If he has truly posted images of children in any way associated with the definition of pornography (partial/full nudity and engaged in any sexual act), then law enforcement NEEDS to be involved here. If his current signature image (the youngster from the Harry Potter series) insuniates pornography...then you may have a personal problem. Don't get me wrong...I do find it a bit odd (if CCS is an adult male without children of his own), but I wouldn't go so far as to call it outright offensive. Just my opinion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




the present avatar and the jpg in his signature are not defamatory or neither against the law. I mean if the pictures depicted a sexual nature where it was deemed inapproriate then something should be done about it.
Anyhows as far as anything else goes the truth of the matter is people will misconstrue or judge others based on what they do.
*cough* i have misjudge someone before and many a times.

anyhows csc has been a mod here before and he was posting images like this before but yet he was a mod here before so what is the point in having this brought up? and the fact is if jorge or the other adminstrators had something against csc being a mod before even when he posted these type of pictures then why did they make him a mod or something. so if it was ok with them and they are the adminstrators and owners of zeropaid the web site then like i said what changeD?

matter of fact it seems that the jpgs and animations are even being curved down. but here is how it goes when u make something out to be something more then it is then retaliation is usually the issue so yeah he might post something else then that is considered by certain people more offensive.

so what has changed?
i want to know.


and besides these were mere gifs and animations. Even me at a time felt that I didnt like the animation but there just animations. come on get real.
This should of not been brought up and although its brought up now I dont see the point in having this thread carried out any longer.


Anyways i sometimes hang on irc and that is rare these days cuz i am moody and I surely aint part of the mob. there aint no mob or whatever this is a mis representation to even bring up the zeropaid chat room with something else that is or has occured and its on a personal level.
you should of left this for pms etc but the point is, there is something called freedom of speech.

anyway everyone is entitled to their own opinion. The way I see it their is no right or wrong way to express it except judging someone without not even knowing them is wrong.

anyway who ever been here for a long time no the real deal to what be going on and what not. and this is kind of interesting to bring this up for what purpose?
hmm
any way i usually dont comment on stuff and i dont know why i did now but o well.
just let people be left the hell alone.
the way i see it he can post what he wants and there is nothing wrong with those images.
there is no sexual scenes etc. and remember for all you know csc can be young or old. you never know the truth on the net.
for all you know i can be 15 or whatever as well.
so enough of this let it go.

[TipYourBartender]

Originally posted by CCSDUDE
Or my current signature text compliments of TipYourBardtender....Madlibs is one FUNNY ass game...lol


For the record, that came out of a game of Mad Libs with me and my friends. If anyone does not see that phrase for the absolute absurdity that it is, I feel sorry for them.

And CJ has a point: If they weren't a problem when he was a mod, what's the problem now??? What happened between then and now that makes it such a big deal???

EDIT: And since when are you a moderator on FacesOfFileSharing??? As far as I can see, those are two different sites, and if I want to publish pictures of my genitalia (I won't), that should affect my standing on FOFS, NOT Zeropaid.

[collideous]

Originally posted by Lucian
If they arent naked, theres no problem with it.

Nude pics however are a totally different story,

Exactly! And there were no naked pics - so there's no problem. Always amazes me how quickly people scream "child porn (http://www.landsend.com/cd/fp/prod/0,,1_2_474_35179_13989_11926_5:view=6,00.html?sid= 2670094230590171060)".

[Krell]

Ardor, you stfu ! You havent been here long enough to even count, let alone get in the middle of this.

Now for the rest of you clueless individuals, dont bother going to FOFS, theres nothing there to see. There never was.

See, if you knew 1/2 of what you think you do, you would know that the issue isnt about what was posted there today. The issue is his attitude and long history of questionable pic posts.


Now in CCSDUDES defense. He has never posted child pornography, if anyone says he did, you tell them to talk to me. I have busted the balls of members on other sites for saying this same shit about him, and I am saying for a fact, there is NO KP.

This issue started this morning when I saw non ZP pics there at FOFS. I didnt single him out, I named him with a few others, and said that the unknown random pics of these girls skanked up the GIRLS area of FOFS. The pics by CCSDUDE werent questionable in any way, in fact, they were the first ones over 12 I have seen him post in a long time. Thats it. It never was a big deal.

The next notch up was, that CCSDUDE said as always, he doesnt give a shit what people think, and started in on sephi, so he made this poll.

Now, hours later, all you passer-bys that love to stop and gawk at traffic accidents, decide to gather around like vultures and know something that someone else doesnt, and have to get in the mix.

Enough has been said about this. GO HOME. Disperse.

[CCSDUDE]

Originally posted by Krell
Ardor, you stfu ! You havent been here long enough to even count, let alone get in the middle of this.

Now for the rest of you clueless individuals, dont bother going to FOFS, theres nothing there to see. There never was.

See, if you knew 1/2 of what you think you do, you would know that the issue isnt about what was posted there today. The issue is his attitude and long history of questionable pic posts.


Now in CCSDUDES defense. He has never posted child pornography, if anyone says he did, you tell them to talk to me. I have busted the balls of members on other sites for saying this same shit about him, and I am saying for a fact, there is NO KP.

This issue started this morning when I saw non ZP pics there at FOFS. I didnt single him out, I named him with a few others, and said that the unknown random pics of these girls skanked up the GIRLS area of FOFS. The pics by CCSDUDE werent questionable in any way, in fact, they were the first ones over 12 I have seen him post in a long time. Thats it. It never was a big deal.

The next notch up was, that CCSDUDE said as always, he doesnt give a shit what people think, and started in on sephi, so he made this poll.

Now, hours later, all you passer-bys that love to stop and gawk at traffic accidents, decide to gather around like vultures and know something that someone else doesnt, and have to get in the mix.

Enough has been said about this. GO HOME. Disperse.

I must admit...well said... :gj

I've posted some pretty wild stuff but never child porn...lol kinda funny how everyone jumps to that right off the bat.

[method77]

Originally posted by collideous
Exactly! And there were no naked pics - so there's no problem. Always amazes me how quickly people scream "child porn (http://www.landsend.com/cd/fp/prod/0,,1_2_474_35179_13989_11926_5:view=6,00.html?sid= 2670094230590171060)". LMFAO!!!
Watch it dude! They might kick you out for sharing porn!

[TipYourBartender]

Krell: You can't expect someone to open a thread like this and NOT have these questions asked.
I had questions. You answered them. That's pretty much it.

[The Hunter]

I have been sitting here watching this, and waiting to see what was said. All i was wondering is the site just for pics of members, and their families, or other pics, such as CCS posted? Again I have sat here biting my tongue, as I have tried to see a single bloody thing that was pornographic about any of his pics. For now lets leave this shit alone, and let Jorge make some rules for a site that he admits is in development.

[Krell]

Actually CCSDUDE I had a better one for ya, but my system locked up and my dinner was about to catch on fire, so I had to start all over.

If anything this is just another example of how the busy bodies here like to stir the pot themselves.

One part of the previous post I DO remember saying is, that if you were to back up a dozens posts, and instead have said, "OH, no biggy, I will move the asians to another FOFS area, as they are such examples of fine art" . . . then this whole thing wouldnt be an issue.

That would have been preferable to telling us that you dont give a shit what others think, and mouthing off at sephi. Alas, like any other politics, if you bury the real issue in a cloud of BS and specullation, turn up the heat, once the riot starts, you just slip out the back.

[CCSDUDE]

Originally posted by Krell
Actually CCSDUDE I had a better one for ya, but my system locked up and my dinner was about to catch on fire, so I had to start all over.

If anything this is just another example of how the busy bodies here like to stir the pot themselves.

One part of the previous post I DO remember saying is, that if you were to back up a dozens posts, and instead have said, "OH, no biggy, I will move the asians to another FOFS area, as they are such examples of fine art" . . . then this whole thing wouldnt be an issue.

That would have been preferable to telling us that you dont give a shit what others think, and mouthing off at sephi. Alas, like any other politics, if you bury the real issue in a cloud of BS and specullation, turn up the heat, once the riot starts, you just slip out the back.

Whatcha cooking? My ass is packed with Pizza and those ever so loveable cheese sticks I can never say no too...lol

Well I did say I moved them to the art section. So it could have ended there had Seph just relaxed and moved on. Oh well whats done is done and for the most part everyone isn't clueless now. So no it wasn't and has never been child porn...lol ZP would be DEAD or a load of people would be banned if people were posting shit like that.

As for slipping out the backdoor...I could make a sick ANAL retentive joke about that...but all I will say is...

"I've got my rubber chicken suit on and the KY is flowing..."

[crackerjacker]

Along with the scream from the death throes
Sharp claws are shining brighter
Dually obscene breaths continues
And rips apart the silence of the night
Crossing the uplifty night
Get down limitless night

Beast of blood

[wapazoid]

Posted by Krell
Now, hours later, all you passer-bys that love to stop and gawk at traffic accidents, decide to gather around like vultures and know something that someone else doesnt, and have to get in the mix.
Why don't you just close the thread?

[crackerjacker]

Originally posted by wapazoid
Posted by Krell

Why don't you just close the thread?


hmm because its not going to be closed yet cuz well hmm
lets just say this thread is not needing to be closed.

people are conducting themselves to a level where it can stay open.
besides let the person who made the thread close it :)

[cheapprick]

Regardless of what sparked this thread, and most people's viewpoints in this thread, I have doubts that the majority of those who voted yes gave a rat shite about the other site. Most probably voted on what they have or have not seen here.

I saw no problem with the pictures you posted at the other site, they were more tasteful that some that were posted. However, if that site is about "faces of filesharing", what purpose do random pictures of women serve?

edit : Vulgus ex veritate pauca, ex opinione multa aestimat

"the rabble estimate few things according to their real value, most things according to their prejudices"

[The Hunter]

The answer is quite simple, It was started by another mod, and it would not be proper to close it without just cause.
Edit, to answer CPs post they have nothing to do with the site in my opinion.

[crackerjacker]

yeah i can infer with that. judging someone merely with out just cause or what they stand for without even knowing them is not a good thing. hence the word.

once again no one really knows the mindset of another and sometimes its best to leave things alone or whatever.
blah i suk :)

[Power Penguin]

I think CCS has an unheathy obsession. He gives the site a bad name.

[wapazoid]

hmm because its not going to be closed yet cuz well hmm
lets just say this thread is not needing to be closed.

people are conducting themselves to a level where it can stay open.
besides let the person who made the thread close it :)
My thoughts exactly...

[FrozenShadow23]

Hmmm...
I personally don't care cause I have the innate ability to ignore pictures and annoying text. I find CSSDUDE's pictures MUCH less annoying than other sig pictures (*cough* tatu *caugh*). Uh, well, yea... hard to determine a flame from a genuine poll isn't it? I believe that this issue is one of the past and there is no need to dig. CSSDUDE has been nothing but gracious (most of the time) and any who do not share my L337 ability (lol) of ignoring stuff, there is a special little tool in IE and other browsers that disables pictures, try it....

/me ownz u with his L337 ignoring abilities... heh... I rule.

[Criminal_Sniper]

if ur into that kind of thing sure i dont care but keep it off here its against the law almost i think too :p though im no lawyer
and why should all people turn off their pictures from diplaying if 1 person wont take down some pictures cause the whole trouble? they shouldnt have to exactly