Partial Filesharing on Multi-Net-Clients

[hybridclient]

Hi
now it is standard (Bearshare/Limewire will also be hybrid as Gnucdna for Morpheus) to be a hybrid multinetworkclient.

Emule is connecting to Donkey and MLDonkey.
Donkey is connecting to emule and Overnet.
MLdonkey is connecting to Gnutella1/2
Gnutella2 is connecting to emule and Bittrorrent.
MLdonkey Beta supports gnutella and Kazaa/Fasttrack with a plugin.

If you release a Partial on any network, it must be a golden rule, that the file is found on any network with each client.

Because of hybridity this is fullfilled now (though some clients do not give a queryhitback for partials by keywordsearcha nd some do not allow brwosing partials or sahring partials - so this should be a must).

The intersting question is now:

- On which client do I release a file best ? IMHO it is emule.
- Because of this Multiswarming the PARTIAL FILESAHRING is ESSENTIAL.

And this means, not the protocol is the essential, but the clients gui to the user and the technical possibilities to swarm and release on the most networks.


We are just testing to release a file
25 % on overnet
25 % on emule
25 % on gntuella 1
25 % on gnutella 2

on each entwork we search and dwonload the file.

Which client will get this file complete first ?

Make a poll !?

[nasrules]

Most people use the same Shared Folders, so most files can be found on most networks anyway!

[hybridclient]

I spoke of partial not of files
And each client has its own partial directory and handling of queryhits

[nasrules]

Still don't quite see the point of it............

If you want to know which network will complete it first, I'd say G2.

1400!

[Sephiroth]

Which NOT ONE of the programs you claim that support your ideals actually do. You got banned from the GDF for spamming this shit and off numeroud other forums as well. So please stop misleading people.

"hybrid" networks just dont work..

Look at The Qube it did pretty much exactly what shareaza is doing now except shareaza allready had a userbase..

Not to mention the strain that "multi-network" programs place on computers allready and the fact there is no real need to run multiple programs all at the same time anymore..

Instead of one program trying to merge all the networks together into some frankstien network personally i think its better to keep them seperate so there is no one huge network to attack like there was back in the days of napster.